Author Topic: Offseason moves?  (Read 176250 times)

0 Members and 7 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline zimm_da_kid

  • Posts: 8150
  • The one true ace
Re: Offseason moves?
« Reply #1525 on: December 01, 2013, 05:28:11 pm »
There is a poster here who had inside info which turned out to be correct. It was last year I think. Anyway, he'll tell us what to do. 

Where is InsaneBoost these days

Offline Mr Clean

  • Posts: 4109
Re: Offseason moves?
« Reply #1526 on: December 01, 2013, 06:18:15 pm »
Where is InsaneBoost these days
That's the one. I don't remember which transaction he knew about. Anyone?

Offline zimm_da_kid

  • Posts: 8150
  • The one true ace
Re: Offseason moves?
« Reply #1527 on: December 01, 2013, 06:19:35 pm »
That's the one. I don't remember which transaction he knew about. Anyone?

I know he claimed to have a reliable source that said the Nats were going hard after Pujols

Offline Vega

  • Posts: 5516
  • Party’s Over
Re: Offseason moves?
« Reply #1528 on: December 01, 2013, 07:06:37 pm »
Insane Boost was 2011. He spouted much bullcrap and then disappeared.

Offline Terpfan76

  • Posts: 3924
  • ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ
Re: Offseason moves?
« Reply #1529 on: December 01, 2013, 08:14:49 pm »
Insane Boost was 2011. He spouted much bullcrap and then disappeared.

And when they found out, they said "this is good"

Offline sportsfan882

  • Posts: 93631
Re: Offseason moves?
« Reply #1530 on: December 02, 2013, 09:59:52 am »
Ohlendorf better be non-tendered today.

Offline WhiteWhale

  • Posts: 1168
Re: Offseason moves?
« Reply #1531 on: December 02, 2013, 10:29:33 am »
who are they other non tender candidates?

post edit - I looked it up, Ohlie would be the only one

Offline NJ Ave

  • Posts: 3485
Re: Offseason moves?
« Reply #1532 on: December 02, 2013, 10:40:36 am »
Why not make Desmond available? We're not going to have the money to pay EVERYONE on this roster. So if Rizzo thinks that Strasburg, Zimmermann and Harper are the 7-10 year guys then everyone else should be available.

I can't say I'd be surprised if they reached out to Cleveland and said hey, what do you think about Lindor, Cody Allen and Masterson for Desmond?

It's also a sign to Desmond - hey, you're a great player but respectfully we gotta float your name if you're not going to sign a long-term deal.

Offline Kevrock

  • Posts: 13814
  • That’s gonna be a no from me, dog
Re: Offseason moves?
« Reply #1533 on: December 02, 2013, 11:24:11 am »
I thought inside boast got banned. He was full of it.

Offline sph274

  • Posts: 2136
Re: Offseason moves?
« Reply #1534 on: December 02, 2013, 11:56:13 am »
Why not make Desmond available? We're not going to have the money to pay EVERYONE on this roster. So if Rizzo thinks that Strasburg, Zimmermann and Harper are the 7-10 year guys then everyone else should be available.

I can't say I'd be surprised if they reached out to Cleveland and said hey, what do you think about Lindor, Cody Allen and Masterson for Desmond?

It's also a sign to Desmond - hey, you're a great player but respectfully we gotta float your name if you're not going to sign a long-term deal.

why would they give all that up when they have asdrubal cabrera entering his age 28 season? not gonna happen

Offline Vega

  • Posts: 5516
  • Party’s Over
Re: Offseason moves?
« Reply #1535 on: December 02, 2013, 12:02:32 pm »
I can't say I'd be surprised if they reached out to Cleveland and said hey, what do you think about Lindor, Cody Allen and Masterson for Desmond?
:lmao:

Offline PebbleBall

  • Posts: 3440
  • Now that right there is baseball.
Re: Offseason moves?
« Reply #1536 on: December 02, 2013, 01:03:35 pm »
:lmao:

Don't jump to conclusions, Rizzo could throw in Strasburg and/or Harper.

Offline NJ Ave

  • Posts: 3485
Re: Offseason moves?
« Reply #1537 on: December 02, 2013, 01:32:23 pm »
Home fans are hysterical. What do you think Rizzo would get for 2 years and probably $15 million in excess value of Ian Desmond?

Hell, why stop at a top-10 list SS prospect in double-A; a RP with 5 years of team control who had a 2.43 ERA and 88 Ks in 70 innings last season and a career 1.74 minior league ERA; and the last year of arbitration for a pitcher they'll be able to get a 1st draft pick for after the season is over, who was basically as good as Jordan Zimmerman, Strasburg, or Gio Gonzalez last year?


Offline WhiteWhale

  • Posts: 1168
Re: Offseason moves?
« Reply #1538 on: December 02, 2013, 01:37:27 pm »
I don't want it to happen, because I'd like for the Lerners to pay to keep this whole thing together, but to me NJ knows his baseball, and I think he has laid out a fair swap. With Desi's silver sluggers and golden glove nomination, the media slurp fest is about to start, so certainly the name recoginition is skewed, but there is a ton of value in what he laid out coming back in that potential trade.

Offline Lintyfresh85

  • Posts: 35152
  • World Champions!!!
Re: Offseason moves?
« Reply #1539 on: December 02, 2013, 01:39:33 pm »
Home fans are hysterical. What do you think Rizzo would get for 2 years and probably $15 million in excess value of Ian Desmond?

Hell, why stop at a top-10 list SS prospect in double-A; a RP with 5 years of team control who had a 2.43 ERA and 88 Ks in 70 innings last season and a career 1.74 minior league ERA; and the last year of arbitration for a pitcher they'll be able to get a 1st draft pick for after the season is over, who was basically as good as Jordan Zimmerman, Strasburg, or Gio Gonzalez last year?



I think they're laughing because they know Cleveland would hang up before Rizzo even finished his pitch. And thus, that is the problem with "home fans"... they severely overvalue their own players and undervalue just how much value they're asking for in return in what they think are "fair" trades.

Online blue911

  • Posts: 18599
Re: Offseason moves?
« Reply #1540 on: December 02, 2013, 01:41:37 pm »
I think they're laughing because they know Cleveland would hang up before Rizzo even finished his pitch. And thus, that is the problem with "home fans"... they severely overvalue their own players and undervalue just how much value they're asking for in return in what they think are "fair" trades.

I think Lindor is untouchable.

Offline HalfSmokes

  • Posts: 21927
Re: Offseason moves?
« Reply #1541 on: December 02, 2013, 01:43:36 pm »
I think they're laughing because they know Cleveland would hang up before Rizzo even finished his pitch. And thus, that is the problem with "home fans"... they severely overvalue their own players and undervalue just how much value they're asking for in return in what they think are "fair" trades.

so two years of desmond isn't worth one of the top ss prospects in baseball plus pitchers?

Offline WhiteWhale

  • Posts: 1168
Re: Offseason moves?
« Reply #1542 on: December 02, 2013, 01:44:42 pm »
I think they're laughing because ...

This is why I dislike emoticon only responses. Linty and others have to guess at what someone thinks about another person's post. whether the laugh was at way too little value, or the opposite.

if we are going to discuss, then dicuss. - commence with eye rolling emoticons only.

Offline Lintyfresh85

  • Posts: 35152
  • World Champions!!!
Re: Offseason moves?
« Reply #1543 on: December 02, 2013, 01:45:37 pm »
so two years of desmond isn't worth one of the top ss prospects in baseball plus pitchers?

+ Masterson? Not a chance

Offline NJ Ave

  • Posts: 3485
Re: Offseason moves?
« Reply #1544 on: December 02, 2013, 01:47:19 pm »
I think they're laughing because they know Cleveland would hang up before Rizzo even finished his pitch. And thus, that is the problem with "home fans"... they severely overvalue their own players and undervalue just how much value they're asking for in return in what they think are "fair" trades.

That's interesting. The Strasburg/Harper comment leads me to believe you're wrong, that at least some people think the ridiculous side is Washington being willing to give up Desmond for that.

Offline Lintyfresh85

  • Posts: 35152
  • World Champions!!!
Re: Offseason moves?
« Reply #1545 on: December 02, 2013, 01:49:42 pm »
That's interesting. The Strasburg/Harper comment leads me to believe you're wrong, that at least some people think the ridiculous side is Washington being willing to give up Desmond for that.


Well, they probably should start to get used to the fact that no team is going to give up their ace + best prospect for Desmond.

Offline HalfSmokes

  • Posts: 21927
Re: Offseason moves?
« Reply #1546 on: December 02, 2013, 01:50:46 pm »
That's interesting. The Strasburg/Harper comment leads me to believe you're wrong, that at least some people think the ridiculous side is Washington being willing to give up Desmond for that.


I actually think it's ridiculous for both sides- the nationals should be in win now mode before Zimmerman and Werth get older, and Harper, Stras, Zimmermann and Desmond leave. You'd have to hope lindor could step in immediately and have zero learning curve. From the indians point of view, I don't think they necessarily have the same urgency to win now and it's doubtful that they could extend Desmond, so a top prospect for two years of a short stop when they aren't built to win now 

Offline sph274

  • Posts: 2136
Re: Offseason moves?
« Reply #1547 on: December 02, 2013, 01:52:32 pm »
they have asdrubal cabrera wy would they be looking to trade to fill a nonexistent hole? he had a down year last year but is still a good, potentially great, ss. the trade makes no sense for the indians

edit: cabrera hits FA the same time as desmond, is that good for us or bad? the yankees are gonna all out on one of them

Offline madj55

  • Posts: 7779
Re: Offseason moves?
« Reply #1548 on: December 02, 2013, 01:56:49 pm »
We'd have to give up more than Desmond to recieve that haul.

Offline NJ Ave

  • Posts: 3485
Re: Offseason moves?
« Reply #1549 on: December 02, 2013, 02:04:43 pm »
+ Masterson? Not a chance

Masterson is what he is - a good but expensive pitcher with a year left before Cleveland has to let him go. You could be right that they'd overvalue him with the extra draft pick that will be attached to him.

But portraying this as crazy is ridiculous.

David Price and Ian Desmond both have two years of team control remaining. David Price has been worth 9.2 WAR over the previous two seasons, while Desmond has been worth 10. Price has a Cy Young but also "possible arm trouble?" i.e. threw slower last year.

David Price's baseline has been "more than Jurickson Profar" all offseason. It's not at all crazy to think that Washington will ask for a similar package for Desmond.