Author Topic: 2025 Off-season - general thread  (Read 84345 times)

0 Members and 8 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline JCA-CrystalCity

  • Global Moderator
  • ****
  • Posts: 45641
  • Platoon - not just a movie, a baseball obsession
Re: 2025 Off-season - general thread
« Reply #200 on: November 01, 2024, 07:47:24 pm »
In this fantasy scenario, why not plug Soto into his natural position, DH?
and Yepez at 1st in this scenario
 Sign Walker too

Offline zimm_da_kid

  • Posts: 8135
  • The one true ace
Re: 2025 Off-season - general thread
« Reply #201 on: November 01, 2024, 10:21:17 pm »
In this fantasy scenario, why not plug Soto into his natural position, DH?


Frankly I wonder if he would be reticent to accept being a DH this early in his career. It’s kind of a diss.

Online IanRubbish

  • Posts: 2746
  • Heading to Spring Training "to mentor"
Re: 2025 Off-season - general thread
« Reply #202 on: November 02, 2024, 03:23:25 pm »
I mean, that's selling low on Abrams. He isn't even arbitration eligible until after next season and has to minor league options.

He's likely Super 2 which will make him arb eligible next season.

Offline JCA-CrystalCity

  • Global Moderator
  • ****
  • Posts: 45641
  • Platoon - not just a movie, a baseball obsession
Re: 2025 Off-season - general thread
« Reply #203 on: November 02, 2024, 03:26:25 pm »
He's likely Super 2 which will make him arb eligible next season.
we will know pretty soon now, right?

Offline UMDNats

  • Posts: 18070
Re: 2025 Off-season - general thread
« Reply #204 on: November 03, 2024, 01:07:20 am »
I don't think it's "selling low" on Abrams if we were to move him for like a real SP like Crotchet. He's had stretches of awesome play but also some poor play. You don't move him for nothing but you can easily shop him.

I don't blame CJ for being flippant about his terrible hitting coach who wants him to smack grounders but the end of the year casino stuff is bad. I think teams still see him as a high-ceiling player and the first half of the year he was legit electric. Easy to see a team thinking they can get him in a good environment, with real veteran leaders and a real coaching staff, and he will shine.

Offline Slateman

  • Posts: 66761
  • THE SUMMONER OF THE REVERSE JINX
Re: 2025 Off-season - general thread
« Reply #205 on: November 03, 2024, 07:07:35 am »
I don't think it's "selling low" on Abrams if we were to move him for like a real SP like Crotchet. He's had stretches of awesome play but also some poor play. You don't move him for nothing but you can easily shop him.

I don't blame CJ for being flippant about his terrible hitting coach who wants him to smack grounders but the end of the year casino stuff is bad. I think teams still see him as a high-ceiling player and the first half of the year he was legit electric. Easy to see a team thinking they can get him in a good environment, with real veteran leaders and a real coaching staff, and he will shine.
Where is right now, if he really is a player with "work ethic and commitment concerns," Abrams is the throw in piece for a Garrett Crochet.

And if he's not, he's way more valuable and we shouldn't trade him.

Online imref

  • Posts: 47470
  • NG Nattitude?
Re: 2025 Off-season - general thread
« Reply #206 on: November 03, 2024, 06:37:00 pm »
Nats declined Gallos’s option.

Offline Senatorswin

  • Posts: 2913
Re: 2025 Off-season - general thread
« Reply #207 on: November 03, 2024, 06:55:29 pm »
First, what evidence is there that Soto could play first?  People keep taking this as if it's a given.  He's not tall, not agile, and has never played infield at any level.  I see no reason to suppose that he'd be anything other than god-awful there, but people seem to just assume sticking his feet on the dirt makes him competent.

Second, that bench is le poop and you've left the entire pitching staff unspoken.

Soto is 6-2. I heard he's been working some at first. I've gotta believe he's a good enough athlete to play first.

Offline Senatorswin

  • Posts: 2913
Re: 2025 Off-season - general thread
« Reply #208 on: November 03, 2024, 06:56:52 pm »
I mean, that's selling low on Abrams. He isn't even arbitration eligible until after next season and has to minor league options.

This.

Offline Senatorswin

  • Posts: 2913
Re: 2025 Off-season - general thread
« Reply #209 on: November 03, 2024, 07:00:45 pm »
I know you have it in for Call, and maybe Vargas too, but don't say that to Garrett where he can hear you. As for Tena, just write that message on a ball and groundit to him. I'm sure it would get by.

Call seemed to make some adjustments later in the year that seemed to make a real difference. We'll see next year. I'm pretty sure Tena won a gold glove at second base at the AA level. If so he's got the leather, might just take him a while to get used to third.

Offline varoadking

  • Posts: 30896
  • King of Goodness
Re: 2025 Off-season - general thread
« Reply #210 on: November 03, 2024, 07:11:39 pm »
Nats declined Gallos’s option.

Shocker!  :shock:

Offline JCA-CrystalCity

  • Global Moderator
  • ****
  • Posts: 45641
  • Platoon - not just a movie, a baseball obsession
Re: 2025 Off-season - general thread
« Reply #211 on: November 03, 2024, 08:32:23 pm »

Online Smithian

  • Posts: 12286
  • Sunshine Squad 2025
Re: 2025 Off-season - general thread
« Reply #212 on: November 04, 2024, 10:49:26 am »
If some team takes a shine to CJ Abrams, I'm not opposed to moving him.

But I really do not want to trade him for a 25 year old outfielder scuffling in AA. He has massive talent, I don't want to let that value walk out the door for nothing.

Offline SkinsNatFan21RIP

  • Posts: 1351
Re: 2025 Off-season - general thread
« Reply #213 on: November 04, 2024, 11:50:15 am »
I think trading CJ would be a massive mistake. There's almost no way it would end up being a positive.

Online Natsinpwc

  • Posts: 27995
Re: 2025 Off-season - general thread
« Reply #214 on: November 04, 2024, 12:17:53 pm »
I think trading CJ would be a massive mistake. There's almost no way it would end up being a positive.
SS are hard to find.  However given his defense it's not clear he can stick in that position anyway.  Depends on the return. 

Offline Slateman

  • Posts: 66761
  • THE SUMMONER OF THE REVERSE JINX
Re: 2025 Off-season - general thread
« Reply #215 on: November 04, 2024, 12:18:02 pm »
I think trading CJ would be a massive mistake. There's almost no way it would end up being a positive.
I mean, the only way it does is if CJ's gambling becomes a bigger problem. I don't really want to root for that.

But this issue makes it murky on what to do with him. If he had finished the season strong without his extra-curricular activities, we could have a real conversation about trading Garcia, putting Abrams at second, and finding a quality shortstop.

Online imref

  • Posts: 47470
  • NG Nattitude?
Re: 2025 Off-season - general thread
« Reply #216 on: November 04, 2024, 12:18:07 pm »
I think trading CJ would be a massive mistake. There's almost no way it would end up being a positive.
I agree. They will give CJ every opportunity to show next year that he has his priorities straightened out.  We gave Robles a ton of space, we'll give the same, if not more, to CJ.

Offline Senatorswin

  • Posts: 2913
Re: 2025 Off-season - general thread
« Reply #217 on: November 04, 2024, 12:28:28 pm »
CJ just turned 24. Hopefully this public embarrassment will straighten him out.

Online Natsinpwc

  • Posts: 27995
Re: 2025 Off-season - general thread
« Reply #218 on: November 04, 2024, 12:30:03 pm »
CJ just turned 24. Hopefully this public embarrassment will straighten him out.
Yes but can it help his fielding?

Offline Senatorswin

  • Posts: 2913
Re: 2025 Off-season - general thread
« Reply #219 on: November 04, 2024, 12:36:35 pm »
Yes but can it help his fielding?

Actually if he stops playing the knucklehead he may work harder on fielding. Seems like he's a good enough athlete.

Offline Slateman

  • Posts: 66761
  • THE SUMMONER OF THE REVERSE JINX
Re: 2025 Off-season - general thread
« Reply #220 on: November 04, 2024, 12:57:03 pm »
https://blogs.fangraphs.com/2025-top-50-mlb-free-agents/

Fangraphs Top 50 free agents with contract predictions

Interesting that the first base market is rather low. Alonso getting 5-7 years and 140ish million would be lower than expected. Christian Walker is estimated at 3 years and 51-54 million.

Gonna be honest, I'd be good with either at those price points. I'd even be willing to go to 4 years and 65 million on Christian Walker (or some sort of 4th year with a 5 million dollar buyout)

Offline Slateman

  • Posts: 66761
  • THE SUMMONER OF THE REVERSE JINX
Re: 2025 Off-season - general thread
« Reply #221 on: November 04, 2024, 02:18:50 pm »
https://x.com/jeffpassan/status/1853511221867114718?s=46&t=AUfBhjveo0TTan1gmB360g

Quote
Passan] The Atlanta Braves have declined their $8 million club option on catcher Travis d’Arnaud, sources tell ESPN. He is now a free agent

Bit of a surprise. Backup catcher option for the Nats?

Online imref

  • Posts: 47470
  • NG Nattitude?
Re: 2025 Off-season - general thread
« Reply #222 on: November 04, 2024, 02:37:14 pm »
https://x.com/jeffpassan/status/1853511221867114718?s=46&t=AUfBhjveo0TTan1gmB360g

Bit of a surprise. Backup catcher option for the Nats?

Atlanta can probably resign him for far less than $8 million.

Online imref

  • Posts: 47470
  • NG Nattitude?
Re: 2025 Off-season - general thread
« Reply #223 on: November 04, 2024, 02:39:43 pm »
Please don't let Anthony Rizzo be our opening day 1B :pray:

Offline Slateman

  • Posts: 66761
  • THE SUMMONER OF THE REVERSE JINX
Re: 2025 Off-season - general thread
« Reply #224 on: November 04, 2024, 03:15:55 pm »
https://x.com/thenatsreport/status/1853465301267919082?s=46&t=jLx_YDErVHMACYESrmKQBQ

Quote
Nationals Hot Stove Rumor:  Nationals might be interested in Marlins 1st/3rd baseman Jake Burger.

Something to be on the look out!

Stove is heating up!!!