Do you think the Red Sox should have bought players at the trade deadline or did they do the right thing? Miller and Morgan were kind of clubbing them for not bringing in a new wave of players when they had the injuries.
Also, I'm going to be in Boston this weekend. I was thinking about catching the Red Sox/Yankees. I'm wondering if it's worth it getting a pair of tickets or just heading to the Bleacher Bar, which I've never been to. Is the Bleacher Bar worth checking out instead? Can you see anything?
I have not been in the Bleacher Bar and really don't know what kind of view is from there. Really, my last Fenway game was in 2006, before it was built!
Demand for tickets is down this year, but this weekend is the NYY, the New York kids are in at BU and the other schools, so I can't tell you what the scalpers will want (in contrast, I'm told you could have had playoff tickets at face). In addition to Stub Hub, you can check out Ace Ticket, a local agency.
I did not buy what Morgan was saying last night. First, Youkilis's injury I think was right after the non-waiver deadline. They did put in claims on guys like Napoli, but were unable to cut a deal. They had Mike Lowell, who probably was as good as rolling the dice on Berkman. Pedroia was coming back, came back in early August, but reinjured himself. Ellsbury, too, I think played some in August, and Varitek eventually came back. Morgan's qualified his argument by saying, "If they knew these guys weren't coming back, they should have made a trade," so his statement can be taken to mean that they were wrong to think that guys who all played in August would have been able to finish the season. Morgan was preaching injury replacement, and the company line was I think correct - those guys were a heck of a lot better than anything you could have traded for before 7/31.
The one deal that perhaps should have been made was for bullpen help, Scott Downs in particular. That was an acknowledged need and there really were not great internal alternatives. They eventually found takers for two of their arms (Ramirez and DeCarmen), but they ended up being very hurt by not having a reliable 3d and 4th arm in the bullpen (and arguably, not a closer). Given what the Nats got for Capps, I could see them being reluctant to pay something similar for Downs within their division. That to me is a closer call than the injury replacements.