Total Members Voted: 52
0 Members and 30 Guests are viewing this topic.
Instead of losing Harper for nothing?? At the very least we could have flipped Puig for s decent player.We messed up big time by not trading him at the deadline.
If the Dodgers could have flipped Puig for a decent player, they would have
You understand how it works. Puig has some value. A draft pick between the 4th and 5th rounds doesn’t have much. Puig will cost 6 million each of the next two years. You aren’t going to get a free agent who can produce like him for that price.
I'm not sure Puig > Eaton. Again, if we keep Harper, Eaton goes.
We get a draft pickIf the Dodgers could have flipped Puig for a decent player, they would have
There's a reason why Puig was batting 7th
The smart move, like I've been saying for a year was to trade him last offseason for a haul,
Who was giving up a haul for few month rental?
.268/.365/.564 14 HR's (more than any other visiting stadium)
I would hate to see Bryce wind up in Philly of all places, but they have 2 things he desires........(1) money and (2) a ballpark that he mashes in. I haven't looked it up but I'm sure he has great career numbers at CBP.
if someone is going to sign him to an Albatros of a contact, I have no issue with it being Philly. 13 years / $400-500 million? Pass.
The Athletic is reporting that the Nats had a deal in place to trade Harper to Houston for three prospects, but that Nats ownership vetoed it. The haul would have included starter J.B. Bukauskas (#76 rated prospect in baseball by BA), catcher Garrett Stubbs and one more prospect.https://www.cbssports.com/mlb/news/bryce-harper-trade-to-astros-reportedly-vetoed-by-nationals-ownership-in-july/
Brilliant. So the Lerners need to meddle and now we will lose Harper and get nothing in return. And if that was the haul at the deadline imagine what we would have got for him last offseason. And some guys on here were saying we would get nothing.