Pages: 1 ... 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 [120] 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 ... 129   Go Down

Author Topic: Washington Redskins thread (2013)  (Read 101002 times)

0 Members and 4 Guests are viewing this topic.

Online blue911

  • Posts: 18594
Re: Washington Redskins thread (2013)
« Reply #2975 on: January 01, 2014, 06:22:52 pm »
Lane Kiffin
Logged

Offline mitlen

  • Posts: 66171
  • We had 'em all the way.
Re: Washington Redskins thread (2013)
« Reply #2976 on: January 01, 2014, 06:30:56 pm »
Quote from: blue911 on January 01, 2014, 06:22:52 pm
Lane Kiffin

I hope that's a blueism.    ;)
Logged

Offline mitlen

  • Posts: 66171
  • We had 'em all the way.
Re: Washington Redskins thread (2013)
« Reply #2977 on: January 01, 2014, 06:35:55 pm »
Quote from: HalfSmokes on January 01, 2014, 06:20:59 pm
Got four years? 

I'm afraid I may not have that much time left.   :)
Logged

Offline madj55

  • Posts: 7779
Re: Washington Redskins thread (2013)
« Reply #2978 on: January 01, 2014, 08:36:07 pm »
Quote from: mitlen on January 01, 2014, 05:32:19 pm
Perhaps he's the most qualified applicant so far.
He definitely isn't did you see his work with the Colts?
Logged

Offline Vega

  • Posts: 5516
  • Party’s Over
Re: Washington Redskins thread (2013)
« Reply #2979 on: January 01, 2014, 08:36:53 pm »
Quote from: madj55 on January 01, 2014, 08:36:07 pm
He definitely isn't did you see his work with the Colts?
I'm pretty sure that Peyton Manning was more or less the coach of the Colts when Caldwell was there.
Logged

Offline madj55

  • Posts: 7779
Re: Washington Redskins thread (2013)
« Reply #2980 on: January 01, 2014, 08:38:02 pm »
^Exactly my point, Caldwell sucks as a head coach.
Logged

Offline mitlen

  • Posts: 66171
  • We had 'em all the way.
Re: Washington Redskins thread (2013)
« Reply #2981 on: January 01, 2014, 08:40:09 pm »
Quote from: madj55 on January 01, 2014, 08:36:07 pm
He definitely isn't did you see his work with the Colts?

Just wanted to be contrary.   :)
Logged

Offline Vega

  • Posts: 5516
  • Party’s Over
Re: Washington Redskins thread (2013)
« Reply #2982 on: January 01, 2014, 08:42:28 pm »
Hell, if we're being honest about it, Peyton is probably more or less the offensive coordinator of the Broncos.
Logged

Online blue911

  • Posts: 18594
Re: Washington Redskins thread (2013)
« Reply #2983 on: January 01, 2014, 08:44:26 pm »
Rich Rodriguez
Logged

Online Slateman

  • Posts: 66694
  • THE SUMMONER OF THE REVERSE JINX
Re: Washington Redskins thread (2013)
« Reply #2984 on: January 02, 2014, 12:01:01 am »



Quote from: HalfSmokes on January 01, 2014, 06:11:11 pm
Yep Cleveland is much better - hire a staff, tell them it's long term, trade away starting running back, saddle them with crap at QB, then fire them for not winning
Getting a first round pick for the second worst RB in football is a brilliant move. I mean, even the blind squirrel finds a nut once in a while.

Quote from: Vega on January 01, 2014, 08:36:53 pm
I'm pretty sure that Peyton Manning was more or less the coach of the Colts when Caldwell was there.

Pretty sure Peyton is a the head coach and Fox is a glorified defensive play caller.
Logged

Offline Smithian

  • Posts: 12268
  • Sunshine Squad 2025
Re: Washington Redskins thread (2013)
« Reply #2985 on: January 02, 2014, 12:41:19 am »
The idea of Ken Whisenhunt is growing on me. Probably won't even get interviewed but hiring him and getting Horton as DC would be a solid move. More resources in DC and he would wear Alfred Morris out and give RGIII a solid, structured system.
Logged

Offline Vega

  • Posts: 5516
  • Party’s Over
Re: Washington Redskins thread (2013)
« Reply #2986 on: January 02, 2014, 12:44:53 am »
Quote from: Smithian on January 02, 2014, 12:41:19 am
The idea of Ken Whisenhunt is growing on me. Probably won't even get interviewed but hiring him and getting Horton as DC would be a solid move. More resources in DC and he would wear Alfred Morris out and give RGIII a solid, structured system.
Whisenhunt is a good coach. He got screwed at the end of his tenure in Arizona by being forced to try to work with Derek Anderson and John "I can't stick on a roster as a third stringer this year for more than a couple weeks at a time" Skelton as his QBs. Of course those teams sucked. Horton is a really good DC too. Both of them together would be a great deal for some team. Alas, Snyder will freak it up.
Logged

Online Slateman

  • Posts: 66694
  • THE SUMMONER OF THE REVERSE JINX
Re: Washington Redskins thread (2013)
« Reply #2987 on: January 02, 2014, 07:44:51 am »
Logged

Offline HalfSmokes

  • Posts: 21923
Re: Washington Redskins thread (2013)
« Reply #2988 on: January 02, 2014, 08:30:52 am »
Quote from: Slateman link=topic=28639.msg13394f31#msg1339431 date=1388638861

 Getting a first round pick for the second worst RB in football is a brilliant move. I mean, even the blind squirrel finds a nut once in a while.


Not to a coaching staff expected to win
Logged

Offline Smithian

  • Posts: 12268
  • Sunshine Squad 2025
Re: Washington Redskins thread (2013)
« Reply #2989 on: January 02, 2014, 08:53:15 am »
Quote from: Slateman on January 02, 2014, 07:44:51 am
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/football-insider/wp/2013/12/30/six-shanahan-assistants-remain-employed-for-now/

We kept Haslett?!?!?!?

And I want the OC of Seattle or San Francisco
They kept a few of the assistants under contract. The new coach will then be expected to sort them out. Wouldn't be a surprise if any of them other than McVay or Morris was retained.
Logged

Online Slateman

  • Posts: 66694
  • THE SUMMONER OF THE REVERSE JINX
Re: Washington Redskins thread (2013)
« Reply #2990 on: January 02, 2014, 09:31:55 am »
Quote from: HalfSmokes on January 02, 2014, 08:30:52 am
Not to a coaching staff expected to win

Unless that coaching staff expected to have more than one season to build a winning team. Richardson was a bust and the fact that they got a first round pick for him is an incredible haul.
Logged

Offline HalfSmokes

  • Posts: 21923
Re: Washington Redskins thread (2013)
« Reply #2991 on: January 02, 2014, 09:38:03 am »
Quote from: Slateman on January 02, 2014, 09:31:55 am
Unless that coaching staff expected to have more than one season to build a winning team. Richardson was a bust and the fact that they got a first round pick for him is an incredible haul.

which is great for the team- the staff, on the other hand, won't be around for the pick- they were told to build for the future then fired after one year.
Logged

Offline Smithian

  • Posts: 12268
  • Sunshine Squad 2025
Re: Washington Redskins thread (2013)
« Reply #2992 on: January 02, 2014, 11:52:23 am »
Vegas odds have Whisenhunt as the favorite. Hopefully they have inside information because I would be very happy with that hire if he hired Ray Horton or another top DC.
Logged

Offline HalfSmokes

  • Posts: 21923
Re: Washington Redskins thread (2013)
« Reply #2993 on: January 02, 2014, 12:00:41 pm »
without a real GM, I could care less about the coach. Coaching takes a crap load of time and effort. Evaluating talent takes a crap load of time and effort. Ideally, a coach wants to win every year. Ideally a GM has a long view and cares about being good now and in the future. I think a team is best served by dividing the roles, and I don't think Allen has ever really been a true GM (he was a cap specialist under Gruden and the same under shanny)
Logged

Offline GburgNatsFan

  • Posts: 22349
  • Let's drink a few for Mathguy.
Re: Washington Redskins thread (2013)
« Reply #2994 on: January 02, 2014, 01:37:17 pm »
Yep.

There might be hybrids that are possible (a player/personnel guy and a head coach that both report to the GM), but I would not ever give the head coach personnel control. Not unless his name was Belichick.

I don't think Redskins One has left the tarmac during the search process. That's a good thing.

Quote from: HalfSmokes on January 02, 2014, 12:00:41 pm
without a real GM, I could care less about the coach. Coaching takes a crap load of time and effort. Evaluating talent takes a crap load of time and effort. Ideally, a coach wants to win every year. Ideally a GM has a long view and cares about being good now and in the future. I think a team is best served by dividing the roles, and I don't think Allen has ever really been a true GM (he was a cap specialist under Gruden and the same under shanny)
Logged

Offline HalfSmokes

  • Posts: 21923
Re: Washington Redskins thread (2013)
« Reply #2995 on: January 03, 2014, 02:30:27 pm »
Logged

Online Slateman

  • Posts: 66694
  • THE SUMMONER OF THE REVERSE JINX
Re: Washington Redskins thread (2013)
« Reply #2996 on: January 04, 2014, 08:00:33 am »
I think we knew that. Cousins is a backup. He might be a starter on a team with a lot of talent. But Griffin is the guy. Now he needs to commit to becoming a better passer
Logged

Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 76956
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: Washington Redskins thread (2013)
« Reply #2997 on: January 04, 2014, 12:41:10 pm »
Jim Caldwell interviewing tomorrow.  :?  Now that Smith was hired by Tampa hopefully this is just to satisfy the Rooney rule.
Logged

Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 76956
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: Washington Redskins thread (2013)
« Reply #2998 on: January 04, 2014, 04:16:22 pm »
Terpfan is going to :az: over this, James Franklin is said to interview for the Redskins head coach vacancy in the next couple days.

TerpFan76: 

Logged

Online blue911

  • Posts: 18594
Re: Washington Redskins thread (2013)
« Reply #2999 on: January 04, 2014, 04:25:37 pm »
Have they hired Ron Zook yet?
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 [120] 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 ... 129   Go Up