Pages: 1 ... 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 [119] 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 ... 129   Go Down

Author Topic: Washington Redskins thread (2013)  (Read 100943 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline madj55

  • Posts: 7779
Re: Washington Redskins thread (2013)
« Reply #2950 on: December 31, 2013, 02:02:58 pm »
Sean McDermott, the Carolina Panthers DC, is a candidate for the job. The Skins are scheduled to interview him.
Logged

Offline varoadking

  • Posts: 30867
  • King of Goodness
Re: Washington Redskins thread (2013)
« Reply #2951 on: December 31, 2013, 02:09:46 pm »
Quote from: Mathguy on December 31, 2013, 11:14:49 am
But these 4 years do not exist in isolation from prior years activities.  Shanahan walked into a bad situation

...and, arguably, made it worse...
Logged

Offline GburgNatsFan

  • Posts: 22349
  • Let's drink a few for Mathguy.
Re: Washington Redskins thread (2013)
« Reply #2952 on: December 31, 2013, 02:16:15 pm »
Mmmm.... hard to argue that. Washington is no longer the place for overpaid FAs to come and "get paid" while not playing well. :)

Quote from: varoadking on December 31, 2013, 02:09:46 pm
...and, arguably, made it worse...
Logged

Online Slateman

  • Posts: 66692
  • THE SUMMONER OF THE REVERSE JINX
Re: Washington Redskins thread (2013)
« Reply #2953 on: December 31, 2013, 07:20:03 pm »
It took 4 years, but the cap is fixed.

Washington has a franchise QB, a franchise LT, a quality RB, a true number 1 receiver

On the defense, the cupboard is a little bare. Kerrigan and Orakpo are bright spots. Cofield  was a nice pick up. Riley seems like a good linebacker. Amerson is a nice pickup who I could see blossoming in to a number 1 corner in a couple years.
Logged

Offline HalfSmokes

  • Posts: 21923
Re: Washington Redskins thread (2013)
« Reply #2954 on: December 31, 2013, 07:35:51 pm »
Orakpo may be gone,  Kerrigan is OK,  but isn't fulfilling his initial promise.  The rest of the defense isn't anything special -  mostly it's crap.
Logged

Online Slateman

  • Posts: 66692
  • THE SUMMONER OF THE REVERSE JINX
Re: Washington Redskins thread (2013)
« Reply #2955 on: December 31, 2013, 07:37:54 pm »
Quote from: HalfSmokes on December 31, 2013, 07:35:51 pm
Orakpo may be gone,  Kerrigan is OK,  but isn't fulfilling his initial promise.  The rest of the defense isn't anything special -  mostly it's crap.

They can franchise Orakpo

Kerrigan has played fine, especially considering he has been playing with a torn meniscus.

There's decent parts on the defense, whether they want to continue with the 3-4 or move to a 4-3
Logged

Offline HalfSmokes

  • Posts: 21923
Re: Washington Redskins thread (2013)
« Reply #2956 on: December 31, 2013, 07:56:15 pm »
Yep so 'decent' they were second worst in points per game allowed
Logged

Offline mitlen

  • Posts: 66171
  • We had 'em all the way.
Re: Washington Redskins thread (2013)
« Reply #2957 on: December 31, 2013, 07:59:18 pm »
Quote from: HalfSmokes on December 31, 2013, 07:56:15 pm
Yep so 'decent' they were second worst in points per game allowed

Weren't that good at scoring points either.     Man, 'skins need work on both sides of the ball and then there's the special team   ...   This is not gonna be a "quick" fix no matter who they bring in.    I guess I'll have to be nicer to my buddy (life long 'skins' fan).
Logged

Online Slateman

  • Posts: 66692
  • THE SUMMONER OF THE REVERSE JINX
Re: Washington Redskins thread (2013)
« Reply #2958 on: December 31, 2013, 09:19:35 pm »
Quote from: HalfSmokes on December 31, 2013, 07:56:15 pm
Yep so 'decent' they were second worst in points per game allowed

Parts =/= the whole
Logged

Offline HalfSmokes

  • Posts: 21923
Re: Washington Redskins thread (2013)
« Reply #2959 on: December 31, 2013, 10:17:07 pm »
Quote from: Slateman on December 31, 2013, 09:19:35 pm
Parts =/= the whole

Good parts make a better whole
Logged

Online Slateman

  • Posts: 66692
  • THE SUMMONER OF THE REVERSE JINX
Re: Washington Redskins thread (2013)
« Reply #2960 on: December 31, 2013, 10:24:40 pm »
Quote from: HalfSmokes on December 31, 2013, 10:17:07 pm
Good parts make a better whole

Need to add more good parts. If they're going to run the 3-4, they have to find a true NT. Cofield is good in a pinch, but you need that huge 340lb guy demanding double teams.
Logged

Offline Nathan

  • Posts: 10726
  • Wow. Such warnings. Very baseball. Moderator Doge.
Re: Washington Redskins thread (2013)
« Reply #2961 on: January 01, 2014, 02:26:00 am »
Wait, what's that about me?  Oh, athletes, never mind.
Logged

Online Slateman

  • Posts: 66692
  • THE SUMMONER OF THE REVERSE JINX
Re: Washington Redskins thread (2013)
« Reply #2962 on: January 01, 2014, 08:50:08 am »
Can we trade Griffin and next year's first rounder to the Rams for the second overall pick and draft Manziel?
Logged

Offline Vega

  • Posts: 5516
  • Party’s Over
Re: Washington Redskins thread (2013)
« Reply #2963 on: January 01, 2014, 04:14:25 pm »
The Skins are interviewing Jim "Robocoach" Caldwell. That would be a horrible signing.
Logged

Offline madj55

  • Posts: 7779
Re: Washington Redskins thread (2013)
« Reply #2964 on: January 01, 2014, 05:01:49 pm »
Quote from: Vega on January 01, 2014, 04:14:25 pm
The Skins are interviewing Jim "Robocoach" Caldwell. That would be a horrible signing.
Rooney rule.
Logged

Offline GburgNatsFan

  • Posts: 22349
  • Let's drink a few for Mathguy.
Re: Washington Redskins thread (2013)
« Reply #2965 on: January 01, 2014, 05:22:50 pm »
Snyder hasn't flown to interview anyone in Redskins One. So far, so good.

Logged

Offline mitlen

  • Posts: 66171
  • We had 'em all the way.
Re: Washington Redskins thread (2013)
« Reply #2966 on: January 01, 2014, 05:32:19 pm »
Quote from: madj55 on January 01, 2014, 05:01:49 pm
Rooney rule.

Perhaps he's the most qualified applicant so far.
Logged

Offline varoadking

  • Posts: 30867
  • King of Goodness
Re: Washington Redskins thread (2013)
« Reply #2967 on: January 01, 2014, 05:36:11 pm »
Quote from: mitlen on January 01, 2014, 05:32:19 pm
Perhaps he's the most qualified applicant so far.

Do you actually apply for those jobs, or is it like the CIA...they recruit you?
Logged

Offline mitlen

  • Posts: 66171
  • We had 'em all the way.
Re: Washington Redskins thread (2013)
« Reply #2968 on: January 01, 2014, 05:39:16 pm »
Quote from: varoadking on January 01, 2014, 05:36:11 pm
Do you actually apply for those jobs, or is it like the CIA...they recruit you?

Good point  ...  maybe he's the only coach/wannabe who would interview with them.   Everybody else is in Cleveland or Minneapolis.   :stir:

"Hey, here comes Snyder and Allen."
"Quick, turn out the lights and pretend like we're not home."
Logged

Offline HalfSmokes

  • Posts: 21923
Re: Washington Redskins thread (2013)
« Reply #2969 on: January 01, 2014, 06:11:11 pm »
Yep Cleveland is much better -  hire a staff,  tell them it's long term,  trade away starting running back,  saddle them with crap at QB,  then fire them for not winning
Logged

Offline Vega

  • Posts: 5516
  • Party’s Over
Re: Washington Redskins thread (2013)
« Reply #2970 on: January 01, 2014, 06:14:16 pm »
Quote from: HalfSmokes on January 01, 2014, 06:11:11 pm
Yep Cleveland is much better -  hire a staff,  tell them it's long term,  trade away starting running back,  saddle them with crap at QB,  then fire them for not winning
Not defending the other moves, but trading Richardson was a good deal.
Logged

Offline mitlen

  • Posts: 66171
  • We had 'em all the way.
Re: Washington Redskins thread (2013)
« Reply #2971 on: January 01, 2014, 06:14:47 pm »
Quote from: HalfSmokes on January 01, 2014, 06:11:11 pm
Yep Cleveland is much better -  hire a staff,  tell them it's long term,  trade away starting running back,  saddle them with crap at QB,  then fire them for not winning

Cleveland was four and twelve.   ;)
Logged

Offline HalfSmokes

  • Posts: 21923
Re: Washington Redskins thread (2013)
« Reply #2972 on: January 01, 2014, 06:15:19 pm »
Not to a coaching staff expected to win now
Logged

Offline mitlen

  • Posts: 66171
  • We had 'em all the way.
Re: Washington Redskins thread (2013)
« Reply #2973 on: January 01, 2014, 06:20:00 pm »
Quote from: HalfSmokes on January 01, 2014, 06:15:19 pm
Not to a coaching staff expected to win now

...   and Washington is?      :hysterical:


Oh yeah, this  ---->   :poke:      too.
Logged

Offline HalfSmokes

  • Posts: 21923
Re: Washington Redskins thread (2013)
« Reply #2974 on: January 01, 2014, 06:20:59 pm »
Quote from: mitlen on January 01, 2014, 06:20:00 pm
...   and Washington is?      :hysterical:


Oh yeah, this  ---->   :poke:      too.

Got four years? 
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 [119] 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 ... 129   Go Up