Author Topic: The "Former Nat Watch" Thread (2011)  (Read 55001 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Tyler Durden

  • Posts: 7970
  • Leprechaun
Re: The "Former Nat Watch" Thread (2011)
« Reply #150 on: April 06, 2011, 01:34:35 pm »
Greinke didn't want to come to the Nats, so the Nats came to him  :lol::


ha.

Who could possibly think it'd be a good idea to acquire guys that the Nats have deemed not good enough to play in DC?

Wil Nieves might be a better hitter now than Pudge, though.  :(

Offline soxfan59

  • Posts: 1208
  • Gough, Gough White Sox!!!
    • John R. Russell, Ltd.
Re: The "Former Nat Watch" Thread (2011)
« Reply #151 on: April 06, 2011, 03:10:23 pm »
Lastings Milledge--  still screwing up fly balls and allowing runs to score. 

Offline Galah

  • Posts: 2859
  • 2016 - the year that everything changed, again.
Re: The "Former Nat Watch" Thread (2011)
« Reply #152 on: April 06, 2011, 03:12:32 pm »
Morgan went 3 for 4 with a triple last night

Offline DPMOmaha

  • Posts: 22885
Re: The "Former Nat Watch" Thread (2011)
« Reply #153 on: April 06, 2011, 03:25:40 pm »
Peralta was cruising until his D committed an error behind him to let Wells on.  Kendrick and Trumbow followed him up with a couple of base hits.  Looks a lot like the 10th for Storen yesterday.

Offline houston-nat

  • Posts: 19056
Re: The "Former Nat Watch" Thread (2011)
« Reply #154 on: April 06, 2011, 03:28:14 pm »
> Joel Peralta pitching for the Rays
Torii Hunter strikes out
Vernon Wells reaches on error by Felipe Lopez
Alberto Callaspo singles, Wells to third base
Mark Trumbo singles, Wells scores
Jeff Mathis strikes out
Jake McGee pitching for Joel Peralta (21 pitches; 9 balls)

Offline Lintyfresh85

  • Posts: 35152
  • World Champions!!!
Re: The "Former Nat Watch" Thread (2011)
« Reply #155 on: April 06, 2011, 04:36:30 pm »
Hanrahan 4/4 in saves.

Offline NatsDad14

  • Posts: 5241
Re: The "Former Nat Watch" Thread (2011)
« Reply #156 on: April 06, 2011, 04:37:42 pm »
Joel Fireman Hanrahan.

Offline PowerBoater69

  • Posts: 14327
    • Twitter
Re: The "Former Nat Watch" Thread (2011)
« Reply #157 on: April 06, 2011, 10:14:27 pm »
Dunn had an appendectomy.

supposedly out only 5 days.

Dunn's Anatomy:


Offline soxfan59

  • Posts: 1208
  • Gough, Gough White Sox!!!
    • John R. Russell, Ltd.
Re: The "Former Nat Watch" Thread (2011)
« Reply #158 on: April 07, 2011, 10:47:13 am »

Offline Lintyfresh85

  • Posts: 35152
  • World Champions!!!
Re: The "Former Nat Watch" Thread (2011)
« Reply #159 on: April 07, 2011, 11:14:17 am »
Milledge DFA'd.

Offline Coladar

  • Posts: 2826
Re: The "Former Nat Watch" Thread (2011)
« Reply #160 on: April 07, 2011, 11:15:25 am »
Milledge DFA'd.

Lol, really? Wow. His MLB career is dead in the water now, obviously GMs not graced with knowing him now will realize what those who have had the Milledge experience already know: He's poison.

Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 76956
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: The "Former Nat Watch" Thread (2011)
« Reply #161 on: April 07, 2011, 11:30:12 am »
AZ weeps.   :'(

Offline Lintyfresh85

  • Posts: 35152
  • World Champions!!!
Re: The "Former Nat Watch" Thread (2011)
« Reply #162 on: April 07, 2011, 02:58:17 pm »


Offline houston-nat

  • Posts: 19056
Re: The "Former Nat Watch" Thread (2011)
« Reply #164 on: April 07, 2011, 04:37:31 pm »
How did I spend all this time not knowing there was a Fangraphs Not!?

Offline imref

  • Posts: 47458
  • NG Nattitude?
Re: The "Former Nat Watch" Thread (2011)
« Reply #165 on: April 07, 2011, 10:33:08 pm »
Milledge DFA'd.

The Loudoun Hounds probably need an OF.

Offline Obed_Marsh

  • Posts: 7593
Re: The "Former Nat Watch" Thread (2011)
« Reply #166 on: April 08, 2011, 02:10:33 pm »
I agree that Lastings was lazy and boneheaded but I don't recall anything toxic that he did. Am I missing something?

Offline sportsfan882

  • Posts: 93631
Re: The "Former Nat Watch" Thread (2011)
« Reply #167 on: April 08, 2011, 02:11:06 pm »
I agree that Lastings was lazy and boneheaded but I don't recall anything toxic that he did. Am I missing something?
Showing up late, jerk in the clubhouse

Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 76956
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: The "Former Nat Watch" Thread (2011)
« Reply #168 on: April 08, 2011, 02:13:24 pm »
I agree that Lastings was lazy and boneheaded but I don't recall anything toxic that he did. Am I missing something?

He didn't fit neatly into the cookie cutter player that people wanted him to be.

Offline Lintyfresh85

  • Posts: 35152
  • World Champions!!!
Re: The "Former Nat Watch" Thread (2011)
« Reply #169 on: April 08, 2011, 02:17:37 pm »
I agree that Lastings was lazy and boneheaded but I don't recall anything toxic that he did. Am I missing something?

He skipped a mandatory team meeting the night before the start of the 2009 season.

Offline Obed_Marsh

  • Posts: 7593
Re: The "Former Nat Watch" Thread (2011)
« Reply #170 on: April 08, 2011, 02:18:30 pm »
I guess YMMV for what constitutes a toxic player. I don't think he goes much beyond putz. Granted he lacks the talent to dog it. I wonder if he will latch on someplace.

Offline Tyler Durden

  • Posts: 7970
  • Leprechaun
Re: The "Former Nat Watch" Thread (2011)
« Reply #171 on: April 08, 2011, 02:23:45 pm »
He didn't fit neatly into the cookie cutter player that people wanted him to be.

Who wanted this?  And what exactly is a cookie cutter player?  A good player?

Offline Lintyfresh85

  • Posts: 35152
  • World Champions!!!
Re: The "Former Nat Watch" Thread (2011)
« Reply #172 on: April 08, 2011, 02:28:09 pm »
Maybe some people care... but I don't care if the player is a complete dick just as long as he produces.

If you suck, and you're an ass, then we've got problems.

Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 76956
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: The "Former Nat Watch" Thread (2011)
« Reply #173 on: April 08, 2011, 02:57:44 pm »
Maybe some people care... but I don't care if the player is a complete dick just as long as he produces.

If you suck, and you're an ass, then we've got problems.


+1

Offline houston-nat

  • Posts: 19056
Re: The "Former Nat Watch" Thread (2011)
« Reply #174 on: April 08, 2011, 03:02:22 pm »
Maybe some people care... but I don't care if the player is a complete dick just as long as he produces.

If you suck, and you're an ass, then we've got problems.

Sounds like you just invoked the Greinke Law of Player Assholiness.