Author Topic: Plan "B"  (Read 135796 times)

0 Members and 7 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 76956
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: Plan "B"
« Reply #450 on: December 29, 2008, 06:05:49 pm »
Skipping 'Plan C' and going to 'Plan D'....as in defectors.   

http://sports.espn.go.com/mlb/news/story?id=3798491


They would cost money to acquire.

Offline PatsNats28

  • Posts: 8522
Re: Plan "B"
« Reply #451 on: December 29, 2008, 06:46:41 pm »

They would cost money to acquire.

I'm too lazy to look up that pic of the Joker and the Nationals fan pic, otherwise I'd post it right now.

Offline hammondsnats

  • Posts: 37394
Re: Plan "B"
« Reply #452 on: December 29, 2008, 07:35:14 pm »
I'm too lazy to look up that pic of the Joker and the Nationals fan pic, otherwise I'd post it right now.



you're welcome 8)

haha i think i've turned most of the board against the Lerners!!!

Re: Plan "B"
« Reply #453 on: December 29, 2008, 07:42:08 pm »
haha i think i've turned most of the board against the Lerners!!!

Not this poster. I have yet to join your reign of paranoia.

Offline PatsNats28

  • Posts: 8522
Re: Plan "B"
« Reply #454 on: December 29, 2008, 07:54:31 pm »


you're welcome 8)

haha i think i've turned most of the board against the Lerners!!!

There we go! :)

Offline hammondsnats

  • Posts: 37394
Re: Plan "B"
« Reply #455 on: December 29, 2008, 07:56:48 pm »
Not this poster. I have yet to join your reign of paranoia.

come NOTLD, join us on the darkside!


Offline sportsfan882

  • Posts: 93631
Re: Plan "B"
« Reply #456 on: December 29, 2008, 07:59:17 pm »
Not this poster. I have yet to join your reign of paranoia.
Will you join if come Opening Day we have not signed or traded for any legit players?

Offline ronnynat

  • Posts: 23269
Re: Plan "B"
« Reply #457 on: December 29, 2008, 08:04:12 pm »
Will you join if come Opening Day we have not signed or traded for any legit players?

It's not the Lerners' fault if players don't want to come here right now. They offered the biggest contract to the best offensive player available, and he passed. I give them an A for effort. It's going to be up to the players that ARE here now to stay healthy and produce this season so better players will want to come here in the future.

Offline cmdterps44

  • Posts: 15551
  • Future
Re: Plan "B"
« Reply #458 on: December 29, 2008, 08:06:25 pm »
Nah The Lerners did a great job on the offer, I will give them that.

But if we just die after that offer and not look to trade/sign ANYONE... we'll then we may be doomed. DOOMED!

Offline Air Zimmerman

  • Posts: 7179
  • best 3b in the business
Re: Plan "B"
« Reply #459 on: December 29, 2008, 08:10:17 pm »
Here are the line-ups if we fail to add anyone this offseason:

SS Guzman
CF Milledge
1B Johnson (cough cough, i mean casto/orr/belliard)
RF Dukes
3B Zimmerman
LF Willingham
C Flores
2B Anderson

or

SS Guzman
CF Milledge
1B Willingham
LF Dukes
3B Zimmerman
RF Kearns
C Flores
2B Anderson

doesn't strike fear in anyone's eyes.

it will strike fear into teams eyes once Dukes emerges as the unstoppable beast he's destined to be and the rest of the team follows suit.

Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 76956
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: Plan "B"
« Reply #460 on: December 29, 2008, 08:10:30 pm »
Nah The Lerners did a great job on the offer, I will give them that.


Bullcrap! If I recall correctly their offer was 185 to the yankees 180. The article said they were perhaps "willing" to go to 200 if they were given the chance but why not offer it anyway and see if they would've turned it down. They were probably afraid he would've accepted the 200.

Offline sportsfan882

  • Posts: 93631
Re: Plan "B"
« Reply #461 on: December 29, 2008, 08:11:58 pm »
It's not the Lerners' fault if players don't want to come here right now. They offered the biggest contract to the best offensive player available, and he passed. I give them an A for effort. It's going to be up to the players that ARE here now to stay healthy and produce this season so better players will want to come here in the future.
I think I agree with you. We can't force players to come here.

Offline tomterp

  • Global Moderator
  • ****
  • Posts: 33885
  • Hell yes!
Re: Plan "B"
« Reply #462 on: December 29, 2008, 08:12:37 pm »
Bullcrap! If I recall correctly their offer was 185 to the yankees 180. The article said they were perhaps "willing" to go to 200 if they were given the chance but why not offer it anyway and see if they would've turned it down. They were probably afraid he would've accepted the 200.

The Nats also reportedly offered an opt-out after 4 years, an option with significant value to any player who might be able to command a higher contract at that point.  More than the $5m, this was a substantial enhancement to the Nats' offer over and above what we know about anybody else's offer.

Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 76956
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: Plan "B"
« Reply #463 on: December 29, 2008, 08:13:47 pm »
It looks like Kasten and the Lerners have had a successful offseason after all.



Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 76956
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: Plan "B"
« Reply #464 on: December 29, 2008, 08:14:36 pm »
The Nats also reportedly offered an opt-out after 4 years, an option with significant value to any player who might be able to command a higher contract at that point.  More than the $5m, this was a substantial enhancement to the Nats' offer over and above what we know about anybody else's offer.

Money talks. Why not just offer the 200 they were supposedly "willing" to offer.

Offline cmdterps44

  • Posts: 15551
  • Future
Re: Plan "B"
« Reply #465 on: December 29, 2008, 08:14:39 pm »
Bullcrap! If I recall correctly their offer was 185 to the yankees 180. The article said they were perhaps "willing" to go to 200 if they were given the chance but why not offer it anyway and see if they would've turned it down. They were probably afraid he would've accepted the 200.

Ah yes, i forgot about there willing... And what i meant was i liked there effort, and not the final offer, they easily should've went higher but i still like there "attempt"... Lets just hope/pray they go and pay for better players :pray:

Re: Plan "B"
« Reply #466 on: December 29, 2008, 08:16:16 pm »
It's not the Lerners' fault if players don't want to come here right now. They offered the biggest contract to the best offensive player available, and he passed. I give them an A for effort. It's going to be up to the players that ARE here now to stay healthy and produce this season so better players will want to come here in the future.

Thank you, Ronny. Well said and I agree. I really think at this point all the anger from the Hammonds and Sportsfans of the world is really misplaced. The Lerners, Kasten, and even (dear god) JimBo are not perfect, but they have always been upfront with the fans about their plans, honest, and so far are doing everything in their power to bring some hope to DC. They haven't failed in the slightest on their end of the stick. However, who has failed us are the players, from Zimmerman to Bergmann.

Teix proved that when it comes to DC, money is a weak bargaining chip. The Nats don't have a whole lot to bargain with to begin with. Winning and commitment will bring players here and THEN when that is seen and known, then money will come into play but until then, it is up to the players on the field to produce and deliver us from this dark patch. They haven't been getting it done and I don't think any single one of them will deny that.

Offline sportsfan882

  • Posts: 93631
Re: Plan "B"
« Reply #467 on: December 29, 2008, 08:16:42 pm »
Ah yes, i forgot about there willing... And what i meant was i liked there effort, and not the final offer, they easily should've went higher but i still like there "attempt"... Lets just hope/pray they go and pay for better players :pray:
These "better players" that you speak of won't come play here for a losing team no matter how much money we throw at them.

Offline PatsNats28

  • Posts: 8522
Re: Plan "B"
« Reply #468 on: December 29, 2008, 08:17:39 pm »
These "better players" that you speak of won't come play here for a losing team no matter how much money we throw at them.

Not true... there are multiple cases of players taking the money and going to bad teams.

Re: Plan "B"
« Reply #469 on: December 29, 2008, 08:18:42 pm »
Bullcrap! If I recall correctly their offer was 185 to the yankees 180. The article said they were perhaps "willing" to go to 200 if they were given the chance but why not offer it anyway and see if they would've turned it down. They were probably afraid he would've accepted the 200.

I think you need to accept the fact that whether the Nats, O's, Kansas City, or whoever offered Teix $200 million, he still was going to the Yanks.

Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 76956
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: Plan "B"
« Reply #470 on: December 29, 2008, 08:23:19 pm »
I think you need to accept the fact that whether the Nats, O's, Kansas City, or whoever offered Teix $200 million, he still was going to the Yanks.

I guess we'll never really know because although the Lerners are said to have been "willing", they never actually made the offer. Why not just throw the offer out there if you're willing to spend it? It would either be turned down or accepted. No harm either way. If they felt they never had a shot then any offer they extended was token anyway. Had they actually offered 200 and been turned down then that's another story. But they didn't. Probably because they were worried Teixeira may have accepted the 200.

Offline Minty Fresh

  • Posts: 20386
  • BOOM!
Re: Plan "B"
« Reply #471 on: December 29, 2008, 08:25:32 pm »
Manny just doesn't fit here.

But Dunn does?

Manny's career OPS v. RHP is .980, Dunn's is .931.

How are we WORSE with Manny?  Just because he's a righty?  Makes NO sense....

Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 76956
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: Plan "B"
« Reply #472 on: December 29, 2008, 08:26:53 pm »
But Dunn does?

Manny's career OPS v. RHP is .980, Dunn's is .931.

How are we WORSE with Manny?  Just because he's a righty?  Makes NO sense....

I think people oppose Ramirez based on his age and his history of slacking off whenever he feels like it.

Offline cmdterps44

  • Posts: 15551
  • Future
Re: Plan "B"
« Reply #473 on: December 29, 2008, 08:28:18 pm »
These "better players" that you speak of won't come play here for a losing team no matter how much money we throw at them.

How would you know?

For one the Tex situation was kinda bs, i mean he wanted to win, we all knew that, the more i think of it, i wanted a larger offer to be out there and turned down. Don't know what good that would've done but still would've showed others promise.

and a "better player" i refer to is Dunn and Hudson, our "supposed" plan B made by Bill Ludsun. I know you don't want Dunn here but he is easily the best choice we can get in the FA market for first base. I'm sure if the price is right he'd come.

Orlando Hudson, I've heard he doesn't care where he plays, just wants to play.

Sure we may be the worst but I know money is at the top of peoples mind.. In Tex's situation, the offers were close enough were he could get both of his needs: Money and Wins.

Offline cmdterps44

  • Posts: 15551
  • Future
Re: Plan "B"
« Reply #474 on: December 29, 2008, 08:29:17 pm »
But Dunn does?

Manny's career OPS v. RHP is .980, Dunn's is .931.

How are we WORSE with Manny?  Just because he's a righty?  Makes NO sense....

I wouldn't mind Manny here only if he would play to his full extent and not pull any of that crap Ive heard he does because hes Manny. We just don't need that