Author Topic: Trade Thread  (Read 89678 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Online Slateman

  • Posts: 66796
  • THE SUMMONER OF THE REVERSE JINX
Re: Trade Thread
« Reply #225 on: June 16, 2016, 09:13:35 pm »
If paplebom would take setup job could be a pretty good pen
He won't and we still have the same problem we have if he's the closer. 8th inning is just as important at as the 9th.

Offline GburgNatsFan

  • Posts: 22349
  • Let's drink a few for Mathguy.
Re: Trade Thread
« Reply #226 on: June 16, 2016, 09:20:09 pm »
It can't actually be in his contract that he closes or he sits. Can it?

He won't and we still have the same problem we have if he's the closer. 8th inning is just as important at as the 9th.

Offline Mr Clean

  • Posts: 4109
Re: Trade Thread
« Reply #227 on: June 16, 2016, 09:23:08 pm »
He won't and we still have the same problem we have if he's the closer. 8th inning is just as important at as the 9th.
He has no choice now.

Offline Optics

  • Posts: 9233
Re: Trade Thread
« Reply #228 on: June 16, 2016, 09:23:47 pm »
Paps is in the same boat Rafael Soriano was in. If he's not gonna close he's basically a wasted roster spot.

Online Slateman

  • Posts: 66796
  • THE SUMMONER OF THE REVERSE JINX
Re: Trade Thread
« Reply #229 on: June 16, 2016, 09:46:15 pm »
It can't actually be in his contract that he closes or he sits. Can it?

He has no choice now.

He'll be even more malcontent. Did we forget what happened to Storen?

And honestly, what good is having him for the 8th? That's going to be  just as high pressure as the 9th in close games and the post season.  He'll have the same issues in the 8th as in the 9th. If he can't close, DFA him, get someone who can.

Offline dcpatti

  • Posts: 3051
Re: Trade Thread
« Reply #230 on: June 16, 2016, 10:05:45 pm »
They're gonna McLouth him, I bet. He won't be back. He'll go on the 60-day soon enough and then he'll just slip away.

Offline BrandonK

  • Posts: 8183
  • #LOLNats
Re: Trade Thread
« Reply #231 on: June 17, 2016, 12:54:26 am »
It can't actually be in his contract that he closes or he sits. Can it?


You guys remember that's why he declined the trade originally, right? That he had to be promised the closer role.

Offline whytev

  • Posts: 8768
Re: Trade Thread
« Reply #232 on: June 17, 2016, 01:31:44 am »
You guys remember that's why he declined the trade originally, right? That he had to be promised the closer role.

It wasn't contractual. More of a gentlemen's agreement.

Offline Ray D

  • Posts: 10073
Re: Trade Thread
« Reply #233 on: June 17, 2016, 08:14:14 am »
It wasn't contractual. More of a gentlemen's agreement.
Right, and more importantly, it applied to 2015.  The "gentlemens' agreement" no longer applies.

Offline 3bside

  • Posts: 500
Re: Trade Thread
« Reply #234 on: June 17, 2016, 08:46:14 am »
Papelbon is a better pitcher than Soriano was.  His splitter and slider are still pretty good and he can locate the fast ball.  Soriano basically lived at the top of the strike zone.  So Papelbon can still be effective out of the closer role.  His contract is up and nobody is going to sign him next year as a closer, so it's actually in his interest to show that he can be effective as a set up man.  This may also be his last chance to play with a contender.

Online Slateman

  • Posts: 66796
  • THE SUMMONER OF THE REVERSE JINX
Re: Trade Thread
« Reply #235 on: June 17, 2016, 02:22:01 pm »
Papelbon is a better pitcher than Soriano was. 
I do not believe this

6.89   K/9 2.30 BB/9 0.95 HR/9 1.23 WHIP  3.11 ERA  3.65 FIP
8.56   K/9 2.76 BB/9 0.58 HR/9  1.13 WHIP 3.19 ERA  3.08 FIP
6.93   K/9 2.92 BB/9 0.73 HR/9   1.34   WHIP 3.28 ERA  3.62 FIP

Which is better?

Offline BrandonK

  • Posts: 8183
  • #LOLNats
Re: Trade Thread
« Reply #236 on: June 17, 2016, 04:36:45 pm »

Offline BrandonK

  • Posts: 8183
  • #LOLNats
Re: Trade Thread
« Reply #237 on: June 17, 2016, 04:38:03 pm »
I do not believe this

6.89   K/9 2.30 BB/9 0.95 HR/9 1.23 WHIP  3.11 ERA  3.65 FIP
8.56   K/9 2.76 BB/9 0.58 HR/9  1.13 WHIP 3.19 ERA  3.08 FIP
6.93   K/9 2.92 BB/9 0.73 HR/9   1.34   WHIP 3.28 ERA  3.62 FIP

Which is better?

The one with the most wins. So Soriano

Online Ali the Baseball Cat

  • Posts: 17946
  • babble on
Re: Trade Thread
« Reply #238 on: June 17, 2016, 04:44:22 pm »

Offline BrandonK

  • Posts: 8183
  • #LOLNats
Re: Trade Thread
« Reply #239 on: June 17, 2016, 04:51:36 pm »
:glug:

Rusty ruined him. Should've traded him at peak value.

Offline OvechkinsWodka

  • Posts: 452
  • chicks dig curly W's
Re: Trade Thread
« Reply #240 on: June 17, 2016, 05:07:31 pm »
If the Yankees asking price is turner, they can trade chapman to the Cubs

Offline houston-nat

  • Posts: 19056
Re: Trade Thread
« Reply #241 on: June 17, 2016, 05:13:08 pm »
If we're trading Trea to the Yankees, it should be for Gary Sanchez.

Offline Mr Clean

  • Posts: 4109
Re: Trade Thread
« Reply #242 on: June 17, 2016, 05:24:15 pm »

Online Slateman

  • Posts: 66796
  • THE SUMMONER OF THE REVERSE JINX
Re: Trade Thread
« Reply #243 on: June 17, 2016, 05:38:20 pm »
If we're trading Trea to the Yankees, it should be for Gary Sanchez.

Theyre not trading one prospect for another.

Anyway, if Trea is in the deal, I expect more than Chapman or Miller.

Offline whytev

  • Posts: 8768
Re: Trade Thread
« Reply #244 on: June 17, 2016, 06:11:24 pm »
Right, and more importantly, it applied to 2015.  The "gentlemens' agreement" no longer applies.

More of an informal neckhandshake agreement, really.

Offline whytev

  • Posts: 8768
Re: Trade Thread
« Reply #245 on: June 17, 2016, 06:15:21 pm »
I do not believe this

6.89   K/9 2.30 BB/9 0.95 HR/9 1.23 WHIP  3.11 ERA  3.65 FIP
8.56   K/9 2.76 BB/9 0.58 HR/9  1.13 WHIP 3.19 ERA  3.08 FIP
6.93   K/9 2.92 BB/9 0.73 HR/9   1.34   WHIP 3.28 ERA  3.62 FIP

Which is better?

I did this in the other thread.

Offline whytev

  • Posts: 8768
Re: Trade Thread
« Reply #246 on: June 17, 2016, 06:16:01 pm »
Theyre not trading one prospect for another.

Anyway, if Trea is in the deal, I expect more than Chapman or Miller.

Dare I say...both?

Offline madj55

  • Posts: 7779
Re: Trade Thread
« Reply #247 on: June 17, 2016, 06:32:37 pm »
Turner isn't getting dealt.

What would it take to get Doolittle?

Offline Truconfidence

  • Posts: 3468
Re: Trade Thread
« Reply #248 on: June 17, 2016, 06:39:24 pm »
These rumor sites are silly. Where would Trea even play? Yankees are set at 2nd and SS. Castro and Gregorius arent FA until 2020

Offline Elvir Ovcina

  • Posts: 5830
Re: Trade Thread
« Reply #249 on: June 17, 2016, 06:40:19 pm »
Theyre not trading one prospect for another.

Anyway, if Trea is in the deal, I expect more than Chapman or Miller.

The problem with having a premium prospect at an up-the-middle position is that everyone asks for him in every trade.  There's absolutely no way he should be moved for a relief pitcher.  Any relief pitcher.  60 innings of relief in one or two seasons at a fairly high salary is not even close in value to 6 seasons of SS or 2B with offense and even passable defense at minimum or near minimum salary.  They'll want everything and a sandwich, just because they're the Yankees and they spend a lot of time sniffing their own jocks. 

Suppose also this: you trade Turner to the Yankees.  2 weeks later, any one of Espinosa, Rendon, or Murphy gets hurt for an extended period (hardly a stretch, especially in Rendon's case).  Suddenly you've got your closer...and Stephen Drew playing in your infield every day.  Then you're f'ed every day of the week and twice on Sunday.  So no.  Absolutely not.  Papelbon closing is better than even taking the risk of that happening.