Author Topic: Fielder  (Read 282094 times)

0 Members and 11 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline PANatsFan

  • Posts: 37398
  • dogs in uncensored, nudes in gameday
Re: Fielder.
« Reply #3375 on: January 19, 2012, 06:54:14 am »
Kilgore unscores what signing Fielder could mean for the Nationals' chances of upgrading their take from the MASN deal:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/sports/wizards/nationals-negotiations-with-masn-will-have-huge-impact-on-franchise/2012/01/18/gIQA26VD9P_story.html?wprss=rss_sports

One potential development, though, could add to the Nationals’ argument. The Nationals have been in talks with free agent first baseman Prince Fielder, a power hitter who would make the Nationals a contender. If the Nationals added Fielder, it could boost their desirability as a television entity.  “I think it would,” Zimbalist said. “Somebody like Fielder offers the possibility of not only the team being more competitive, but generating excitement in his own right.”




Well now it's got to happen!

Offline Evolution33

  • Posts: 5093
    • Blown Save, Win
Re: Fielder.
« Reply #3376 on: January 19, 2012, 07:19:29 am »
At this point if Fielder chooses the Rangers or another team jumps in and blows him away then the entire season we will be wondering what could have been.

Offline Baseball is Life

  • Posts: 20393
  • Proud member of the Sunshine Squad.
Re: Fielder.
« Reply #3377 on: January 19, 2012, 07:51:47 am »
At this point if Fielder chooses the Rangers or another team jumps in and blows him away then the entire season we will be wondering what could have been.

Nah. I never assumed signing Fielder was a given. I'm happy to compete with the team we have. If we get him with a sane deal, great. If not, that's great too. We move on.

Either way, ST starts in less than one month and OD is less than 3 months away. I won't let the machinations of FA ruin that excitement for me.


Offline natsfan4evr

  • Posts: 6171
Re: Fielder.
« Reply #3378 on: January 19, 2012, 08:01:19 am »
I want him to make up his mind already, even if that means going to the Marlins. I want to get excited about this season, and this constant will he/won't he battle is seriously eating into my life. I'm obsessed with tracking every new tidbit and latching onto any rumor that is released. I know it isn't healthy, but it is like an uncontrollable urge that I have.


Offline CALSGR8

  • Posts: 11627
  • BE LOUD. BE PROUD. BE POSITIVE!
Re: Fielder.
« Reply #3379 on: January 19, 2012, 08:03:34 am »
I want him to make up his mind already, even if that means going to the Marlins. I want to get excited about this season, and this constant will he/won't he battle is seriously eating into my life. I'm obsessed with tracking every new tidbit and latching onto any rumor that is released. I know it isn't healthy, but it is like an uncontrollable urge that I have.




+1

Offline Baseball is Life

  • Posts: 20393
  • Proud member of the Sunshine Squad.
Re: Fielder.
« Reply #3380 on: January 19, 2012, 08:10:21 am »
I want him to make up his mind already, even if that means going to the Marlins. I want to get excited about this season, and this constant will he/won't he battle is seriously eating into my life. I'm obsessed with tracking every new tidbit and latching onto any rumor that is released. I know it isn't healthy, but it is like an uncontrollable urge that I have.



I'm sick of it too. Such is the risk of following anything too closely, I guess.

But I try to put it into perspective. He won't put food on my table. In fact, if I invited him over, he would take plenty of food OFF of it.

Offline tomterp

  • Global Moderator
  • ****
  • Posts: 33885
  • Hell yes!
Re: Fielder.
« Reply #3381 on: January 19, 2012, 08:15:48 am »
At this point if Fielder chooses the Rangers or another team jumps in and blows him away then the entire season we will be wondering what could have been.

Not all of us.  Some will be wondering what could of been.

 8)

Offline InsaneBoost

  • Posts: 1479
  • Censored
Re: Fielder.
« Reply #3382 on: January 19, 2012, 08:25:15 am »
Get the pitchforks and torches ready!!!!


Offline wpa2629

  • Posts: 17048
  • No Trade Clause
Re: Fielder.
« Reply #3383 on: January 19, 2012, 08:27:17 am »
:panic: :panic: :panic: :panic:

Offline wpa2629

  • Posts: 17048
  • No Trade Clause
Re: Fielder.
« Reply #3384 on: January 19, 2012, 08:59:08 am »
Adam Kilgore @AdamKilgoreWP 5m

After Rangers GM Jon Daniels said it's "very unlikely" Texas signs Prince Fielder, the Nats look like the favorite. wapo.st/xeO4rp

Offline Rasta

  • Posts: 1515
Re: Fielder.
« Reply #3385 on: January 19, 2012, 09:00:02 am »
Adam Kilgore @AdamKilgoreWP 5m

After Rangers GM Jon Daniels said it's "very unlikely" Texas signs Prince Fielder, the Nats look like the favorite. wapo.st/xeO4rp

Awesome.  The quote from Daniels...

Quote
and then Rangers General Manager Jon Daniels said of signing him, “I’m intimately aware of our budget, and it’s very unlikely.”

I'll believe it when I see it though.  Come on Lerners, get it done!

Offline Baseball is Life

  • Posts: 20393
  • Proud member of the Sunshine Squad.
Re: Fielder.
« Reply #3386 on: January 19, 2012, 09:05:00 am »
Awesome.  The quote from Daniels...

I'll believe it when I see it though.  Come on Lerners, get it done!


This could be just posturing by the GM. You know, "we have a tight budget so take less, PF."

I have come to the conclusion that if Prince doesn't sign with the Nats, it will be because he didn't want to be here. It won't be over money. And if that's the case, who wants him anyway.

Offline Rasta

  • Posts: 1515
Re: Fielder.
« Reply #3387 on: January 19, 2012, 09:08:58 am »
This could be just posturing by the GM. You know, "we have a tight budget so take less, PF."

I have come to the conclusion that if Prince doesn't sign with the Nats, it will be because he didn't want to be here. It won't be over money. And if that's the case, who wants him anyway.

My opinion has always been that he ends up in Texas.  And I don't want him here if he doesn't want to be here but the reality is that there may just be too much money on the table for him to turn down.  If that Nats are at 6 or 7 years at 24/year and the Rangers can only do a 3 year with an opt out at less money then that's the scenario where I see him ending up here. 

I don't mind if he prefers Texas and we are a close second.  I would prefer Texas too because they are closer to winning.  But if he desperately wants to be there and really has no interest in being here then screw him. 

Offline mach1ne

  • Posts: 1206
Re: Fielder.
« Reply #3388 on: January 19, 2012, 09:10:22 am »
This could be just posturing by the GM. You know, "we have a tight budget so take less, PF."

I have come to the conclusion that if Prince doesn't sign with the Nats, it will be because he didn't want to be here. It won't be over money. And if that's the case, who wants him anyway.

Spot on.  If he signs with the Rangers for less money it's because he wants to win now.

Offline Baseball is Life

  • Posts: 20393
  • Proud member of the Sunshine Squad.
Re: Fielder.
« Reply #3389 on: January 19, 2012, 09:10:54 am »
But if he desperately wants to be there and really has no interest in being here then screw him. 

+100

Offline Minty Fresh

  • Posts: 20386
  • BOOM!
Re: Fielder.
« Reply #3390 on: January 19, 2012, 09:11:27 am »
Adam Kilgore @AdamKilgoreWP 5m

After Rangers GM Jon Daniels said it's "very unlikely" Texas signs Prince Fielder, the Nats look like the favorite. wapo.st/xeO4rp




                                                  I've got a bad feeling about this...

Offline cmdterps44

  • Posts: 15551
  • Future
Re: Fielder.
« Reply #3391 on: January 19, 2012, 09:11:59 am »
I don't mind if he prefers Texas and we are a close second.  I would prefer Texas too because they are closer to winning.  But if he desperately wants to be there and really has no interest in being here then screw him. 

While I normally agree with the "closer to winning" idea and yes, they were in the World Series two years in a row, I think we have a better chance long term. I mean, if he goes there on a 3-4 yr deal for some reason then thats the obvious choice. If he come here on a 6-7 year deal, then I see us being more competitive following this year.

It would be insane to see Kinsler, Hamilton, Fielder, Cruz, Napoli, and Beltre all in the same lineup. It would be even cooler to see him batting fourth between Zimmerman and Morse though!

Offline Ray D

  • Posts: 10073
Re: Fielder.
« Reply #3392 on: January 19, 2012, 09:12:18 am »
Anyone listen to XM MLB around 8-8:30 this morning. They listed all the teams that they think are now back in it for Fielder, given the Darvish signing and the current theory that his market value is, at the moment, 5 years/150M.  They listed about 12 teams, with the Nationals about in the middle of the pack.

Offline wpa2629

  • Posts: 17048
  • No Trade Clause
Re: Fielder.
« Reply #3393 on: January 19, 2012, 09:12:29 am »
That's no moon

That's a space station!!


:panic: :panic: :panic:

Offline Baseball is Life

  • Posts: 20393
  • Proud member of the Sunshine Squad.
Re: Fielder.
« Reply #3394 on: January 19, 2012, 09:12:34 am »
Spot on.  If he signs with the Rangers for less money it's because he wants to win now.

It's not like we lost 100 game last year. C'Mon. We are a team that's on the verge of playoff contention, according to most. The days of us having to beg for FA are over. If he doesn't get that, then eff him and the buffet table he's attached to.

Offline cmdterps44

  • Posts: 15551
  • Future
Re: Fielder.
« Reply #3395 on: January 19, 2012, 09:13:25 am »
The days of us having to beg for FA are over.

I agree with your post except this. This remains to be seen.

Offline Minty Fresh

  • Posts: 20386
  • BOOM!
Re: Fielder.
« Reply #3396 on: January 19, 2012, 09:14:53 am »
I just hate being the frontrunner.  Nothing to gain except disappointment.

Offline Baseball is Life

  • Posts: 20393
  • Proud member of the Sunshine Squad.
Re: Fielder.
« Reply #3397 on: January 19, 2012, 09:15:57 am »
I agree with your post except this. This remains to be seen.

I understand but I don't think we need to grossly overpay anymore like we did with Werth. Yes, there are some doubters out there but real smart baseball people know that this franchise is headed in the right direction.

Offline cmdterps44

  • Posts: 15551
  • Future
Re: Fielder.
« Reply #3398 on: January 19, 2012, 09:16:51 am »
I understand but I don't think we need to grossly overpay anymore like we did with Werth. Yes, there are some doubters out there but real smart baseball people know that this franchise is headed in the right direction.

True. It only takes Fielder to go to Texas for less money to prove us wrong though. I mean, it is a good sign that Gio wanted to be here and immediately wanted an extension.

Offline sportsfan882

  • Posts: 93631
Re: Fielder.
« Reply #3399 on: January 19, 2012, 09:17:39 am »
Quote
Jon Morosi @jonmorosi 18m

One rival executive believes the #Rangers will end up with Prince Fielder. “They are experts at playing possum,” he said. #Nationals

I agree. The Rangers are going to swoop in and get him despite what their GM says. It makes the most sense.