 
|
Recent Posts
depends on the quality of the sushi. Does grayling and char make for good sushi?
A role he’s never held before, never even started 10 games in a season as he enters his age 29 season with only 2 years of team control.Its interesting, Preller essentially did with Soto what I proposed with Lane Thomas. Gamble on a guy who could be great, but also has durability concerns.
Private jet chartered from LA to Torontodepends on the quality of the sushi. Does grayling and char make for good sushi?
Yusei Kikuchi reserves entire upscale sushi restaurant near Rogers Centre for tonight. Reservation made for 50+ people.
Ohtani going to the Jays
a bit. The folks who used to boost UZR used to say you need about 3 years of data before it starts to look like a reliable measure of a defender's skills. I mean, Michael Taylor is volatile too on some defensive measures, and there's little question he's substantially above average as a defender.
I'll be curious about how they calculate the Nats payment on their TV revenue. Were they getting money at all during the dispute over MASN? Even if they were getting the portion of the payments that MASN/Os don't dispute, were the Nats being deemed to have received the money in dispute and paying that? If the Nats were paying on the disputed money, were the Os as well (the deal provides that the Os get the same rights fee out of MASN as the Nats)? Are the Os payers as well?
Baseball defense year to year is like hockey goaltending. Voodoo.a bit. The folks who used to boost UZR used to say you need about 3 years of data before it starts to look like a reliable measure of a defender's skills. I mean, Michael Taylor is volatile too on some defensive measures, and there's little question he's substantially above average as a defender.
I asked this on the baseball subreddit and finally got an answer that sorta kinda makes sense:I'll be curious about how they calculate the Nats payment on their TV revenue. Were they getting money at all during the dispute over MASN? Even if they were getting the portion of the payments that MASN/Os don't dispute, were the Nats being deemed to have received the money in dispute and paying that? If the Nats were paying on the disputed money, were the Os as well (the deal provides that the Os get the same rights fee out of MASN as the Nats)? Are the Os payers as well?
Edit: This definition makes it sound like it's not a static determination but rather one that is recalculated every season. I wonder how that would work if a team was on the bubble between being a payor vs payee club and how that would affect the draft lottery. So, definitely still confusing.
