Economic Structure
✅ Luxury tax with steeper penalties and additional thresholds
✅ A salary floor tied to revenue sharing spending rules
✅ No hard salary cap, but cap-like payroll management mechanisms (e.g., tax apron restrictions)
✅ Enhanced revenue sharing with accountability requirements

Player Compensation and Mobility
✅ Incremental increases in minimum salaries and pre-arbitration bonus pools
✅ Pilot or expanded draft lottery and modified international draft/bonus pools
✅ Potential tweaks to service time and arbitration eligibility (but not radical change)

Benefits & Protections
✅ Improved health, safety, and long-term player welfare benefits
✅ Enhanced pension/retirement structures
✅ Expanded rules around player development and agent access

Growth Initiatives
✅ Expanded playoffs revenue sharing (player bonuses tied to TV revenue)
✅ Tech innovations and fan experience considerations

Like mentioned above, it seems likely they may start showing a game a week OTA.   But that's not really the future either.   Only about 20% of the population actually use an antenna, so purely OTA is not a huge market.   The main network affiliates do have cable/sat/YTTV coverage, but have network obligations in prime time when most games are played.   The smaller OTA stations could pick up games, but if they did so, they'd try to leverage carriage fees to get on cable/sat etc, which makes them no different than the failing RSNs.

If they want to show the games free and ad supported, they can do that via streaming.   Once they give it away for free though, then it is hard to sell them to anyone.   The current $100/year is not a signicant revenue generator, and has other motivations.