 
|
Recent Posts
No, thats not how that works. He's simply getting more chances because the pitching is giving up more contact.
Well if all these stats are so great his range is graded on these stats and his range is rated very high.No, thats not how that works. He's simply getting more chances because the pitching is giving up more contact.
Not since 2022 (retroactive to 2016).That explains their negative defensive rating. They used the -9 OAA in the calculations.
https://blogs.fangraphs.com/a-fangraphs-war-fielding-update/
Hes not getting a lot of batted balls because of his range, he's getting then because Nats pitching is awful
Eh, they're as valid as the more traditional stats you quoted in my opinion. They just require a larger sample size and generally best not to be used in isolation.Whats more interesting is OAA is more based on measurable range and time to get to the ball. Abrams should have a great OAA .... except his arm keeps him from making the play once he gets there.
Actually it's pretty rare for there to be this big a discrepancy between OAA and UZR/DRS. It will be interesting to see how they view him next season.
I would think Angelos will tie the award u litigation if he can.
FGs uses UZR for their calculationsNot since 2022 (retroactive to 2016).
DRS gives credit for things outside of the fielder's control, like double plays, and range ratings. Also, his 4 DRS puts him in the back half of shortstops. And he is probably that high up because of all the double plays, which is directly linked to Nats pitching having a .346 OBP against
Which is why a lot of these stats are not valid in my opinion. If you get to a lot of balls with range that counts for a lot in my book.
Hes not getting a lot of batted balls because of his range, he's getting then because Nats pitching is awful
Which is why a lot of these stats are not valid in my opinion. If you get to a lot of balls with range that counts for a lot in my book.
