Author Topic: Skenes / Langford Watch (and other 2023 draftees)  (Read 16163 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline imref

  • Posts: 50184
  • NG Nattitude?
Re: Skenes / Langford Watch (and other 2023 draftees)
« Reply #175 on: May 13, 2025, 09:42:52 am »
Dollander allowed just one hit in 6 IP last night - a 2R HR to Langford in a battle of the 2023 draftees. Rockies lose 2-1.

Paul Skenes had another solid start last night against the Mets: 6IP, 6H, 1ER, 3BB, 6Ks. ERA down to 2.63.  Pirates lose 4-3.

Offline JCA-CrystalCity

  • Global Moderator
  • ****
  • Posts: 48631
  • Platoon - not just a movie, a baseball obsession
Re: Skenes / Langford Watch (and other 2023 draftees)
« Reply #176 on: May 13, 2025, 10:01:15 am »
I'm beginning to think that the incentives for full-season call-ups for highly-rated prospects are having a perverse effect on development. I mention Merrill and Chourio having problems for 2 months at the start of last year. I guess it worked out well for them. For others like Jackson Holliday it really was rushed. Rutschman and Henderson had better paths. Being held back didn't hurt Skenes. Dollander looks like he could have used more time in the minors.

Paging RD!

Offline imref

  • Posts: 50184
  • NG Nattitude?
Re: Skenes / Langford Watch (and other 2023 draftees)
« Reply #177 on: May 13, 2025, 11:38:14 am »
I'm beginning to think that the incentives for full-season call-ups for highly-rated prospects are having a perverse effect on development. I mention Merrill and Chourio having problems for 2 months at the start of last year. I guess it worked out well for them. For others like Jackson Holliday it really was rushed. Rutschman and Henderson had better paths. Being held back didn't hurt Skenes. Dollander looks like he could have used more time in the minors.

Paging RD!
Holliday is finding his groove as of late. .304 /  .842 OPS in his last 15, season OPS is up to .745

Offline JCA-CrystalCity

  • Global Moderator
  • ****
  • Posts: 48631
  • Platoon - not just a movie, a baseball obsession
Re: Skenes / Langford Watch (and other 2023 draftees)
« Reply #178 on: May 13, 2025, 01:54:16 pm »
Holliday is finding his groove as of late. .304 /  .842 OPS in his last 15, season OPS is up to .745
which gets to my point about his initial call up being premature. 

Offline imref

  • Posts: 50184
  • NG Nattitude?
Re: Skenes / Langford Watch (and other 2023 draftees)
« Reply #179 on: May 13, 2025, 02:05:49 pm »
which gets to my point about his initial call up being premature. 
or, it just takes top prospects some time to get comfortable in the majors.

Offline varoadking

  • Posts: 31751
  • King of Goodness
Re: Skenes / Langford Watch (and other 2023 draftees)
« Reply #180 on: May 13, 2025, 03:52:35 pm »
Skenes has opted-in to the 2026 WBC...

Offline Slateman

  • Posts: 68735
  • THE SUMMONER OF THE REVERSE JINX
Re: Skenes / Langford Watch (and other 2023 draftees)
« Reply #181 on: May 13, 2025, 05:50:45 pm »
Skenes has opted-in to the 2026 WBC...
Probably the only meaningful baseball he will play for the next 6 years

Offline imref

  • Posts: 50184
  • NG Nattitude?
Re: Skenes / Langford Watch (and other 2023 draftees)
« Reply #182 on: May 13, 2025, 07:18:50 pm »
Probably the only meaningful baseball he will play for the next 6 years
harsh but true.

Offline imref

  • Posts: 50184
  • NG Nattitude?
Re: Skenes / Langford Watch (and other 2023 draftees)
« Reply #183 on: May 22, 2025, 11:08:15 pm »
Langford's last 15: .182 BA / .679 OPS

Offline SkinsNatFan21RIP

  • Posts: 1567
Re: Skenes / Langford Watch (and other 2023 draftees)
« Reply #184 on: May 24, 2025, 11:43:04 am »
Are the pirates seriously talking about trading Skenes? Thank you Manfred for screwing us with your stupid draft lottery and rewarding one of the worst owners in baseball.

Offline JCA-CrystalCity

  • Global Moderator
  • ****
  • Posts: 48631
  • Platoon - not just a movie, a baseball obsession
Re: Skenes / Langford Watch (and other 2023 draftees)
« Reply #185 on: May 24, 2025, 12:32:14 pm »
do we need to start talking about Jacob Wilson in this "draft picks who might have been better than Crews" discussion?

I'm still good with Crews, the thought process, and the results I anticipate, especially if Skenes is removed from the discussion. I'm just really disappointed with Crews's oblique. Still top rookie in steals, second to Simpson in steals. Baldwin may walk away with RotY, but other than that, Crews I think had 4 months of just hitting his x stats to be the top guy in the NL. 20/20 and .240 would be enough.

Offline IanRubbish

  • Posts: 4192
Re: Skenes / Langford Watch (and other 2023 draftees)
« Reply #186 on: May 24, 2025, 01:11:57 pm »
do we need to start talking about Jacob Wilson in this "draft picks who might have been better than Crews" discussion?

Rizzo would never get a man crush on him, not especially tall and limited power.  Wilson did have absurdly low K rates in college which have continued into his pro and MLB careers, and will likely continue to support a high OBP.  Somewhat of a creative pick, so no chance he would have ended up a Nat even if we were picking lower down in the 1st round.

Offline imref

  • Posts: 50184
  • NG Nattitude?
Re: Skenes / Langford Watch (and other 2023 draftees)
« Reply #187 on: June 07, 2025, 12:35:09 am »
Langford’s last 30 games: .175 / .595 OPS

Offline Natsinpwc

  • Posts: 28599
Re: Skenes / Langford Watch (and other 2023 draftees)
« Reply #188 on: June 07, 2025, 08:34:17 am »
Langford’s last 30 games: .175 / .595 OPS
Coles would have fixed that.

Offline Kevrock

  • Posts: 13917
  • That’s gonna be a no from me, dog
Re: Skenes / Langford Watch (and other 2023 draftees)
« Reply #189 on: June 07, 2025, 12:16:56 pm »
do we need to start talking about Jacob Wilson in this "draft picks who might have been better than Crews" discussion?

I'm still good with Crews, the thought process, and the results I anticipate, especially if Skenes is removed from the discussion. I'm just really disappointed with Crews's oblique. Still top rookie in steals, second to Simpson in steals. Baldwin may walk away with RotY, but other than that, Crews I think had 4 months of just hitting his x stats to be the top guy in the NL. 20/20 and .240 would be enough.

Wilson was the best contact hitter in the draft but was never projected top 3 I don’t think. Langford was the only other realistic pick at this slot. Bringing up Wilson is like 20 teams blaming their GMs for not drafting Trout.

Offline Slateman

  • Posts: 68735
  • THE SUMMONER OF THE REVERSE JINX
Re: Skenes / Langford Watch (and other 2023 draftees)
« Reply #190 on: June 07, 2025, 12:21:55 pm »
Wilson was the best contact hitter in the draft but was never projected top 3 I don’t think. Langford was the only other realistic pick at this slot. Bringing up Wilson is like 20 teams blaming their GMs for not drafting Trout.
Agreed. If Rizzo had taken Wilson over Crews, we would have rioted. And then we would be begging for a Rizzo extension.

Langford over Crews was a legit conversation. Anyone else was not.

Offline JCA-CrystalCity

  • Global Moderator
  • ****
  • Posts: 48631
  • Platoon - not just a movie, a baseball obsession
Re: Skenes / Langford Watch (and other 2023 draftees)
« Reply #191 on: June 07, 2025, 12:42:21 pm »
Wilson was the best contact hitter in the draft but was never projected top 3 I don’t think. Langford was the only other realistic pick at this slot. Bringing up Wilson is like 20 teams blaming their GMs for not drafting Trout.
Agreed. If Rizzo had taken Wilson over Crews, we would have rioted. And then we would be begging for a Rizzo extension.

Langford over Crews was a legit conversation. Anyone else was not.
Agree in terms of the pick and the thought process. It really was Crews vs Langford once Skenes was off the board, and Langford really was the minority choice. Wilson is like "you could have had Trout." That said, he showing signs of maybe having the best immediate positional-career out of a great draft.

Offline imref

  • Posts: 50184
  • NG Nattitude?
Re: Skenes / Langford Watch (and other 2023 draftees)
« Reply #192 on: June 25, 2025, 03:33:46 pm »
Misiorowski vs Skenes today in Milwaukee. Skenes gave up 4 runs in the 2nd inning vs Milwaukee. BB, 3 singles, double, and a couple of FCs.

Since then, 2 IP, 2Ks, 0H, 0BBs. Done after 4 innings, 78 pitches. 

Misiorowski has gone 5 so far, 2H, 2BB, 8Ks, 0R

Offline JCA-CrystalCity

  • Global Moderator
  • ****
  • Posts: 48631
  • Platoon - not just a movie, a baseball obsession
Re: Skenes / Langford Watch (and other 2023 draftees)
« Reply #193 on: June 28, 2025, 03:59:27 pm »
Langford following Crews's lead: going on the IL with an oblique strain.

Offline imref

  • Posts: 50184
  • NG Nattitude?
Re: Skenes / Langford Watch (and other 2023 draftees)
« Reply #194 on: July 07, 2025, 09:46:36 pm »
Dollander optioned. 6.68 ERA. Langford returned this past Saturday.

Offline imref

  • Posts: 50184
  • NG Nattitude?
Re: Skenes / Langford Watch (and other 2023 draftees)
« Reply #195 on: August 06, 2025, 08:57:53 am »
The Pirates have reportedly begun extension talks with Skenes.

Offline JCA-CrystalCity

  • Global Moderator
  • ****
  • Posts: 48631
  • Platoon - not just a movie, a baseball obsession
Re: Skenes / Langford Watch (and other 2023 draftees)
« Reply #196 on: August 06, 2025, 09:56:49 am »
The Pirates have reportedly begun extension talks with Skenes.
they offered him US Steel but he's holding out for all of Nippon Steel

Offline nobleisthyname

  • Posts: 4491
Re: Skenes / Langford Watch (and other 2023 draftees)
« Reply #197 on: August 07, 2025, 07:51:45 am »
The Pirates have reportedly begun extension talks with Skenes.

Pirates seem to be as confusing an organization as the Rockies. Why try and extend Skenes if you have zero interest in putting a competitive team around him?

Unless they're hoping Skenes will take a Keller or Hayes style extension which seems unlikely.

Offline varoadking

  • Posts: 31751
  • King of Goodness
Re: Skenes / Langford Watch (and other 2023 draftees)
« Reply #198 on: August 07, 2025, 09:42:09 am »

Isn't Skenes a Boras client?

Offline imref

  • Posts: 50184
  • NG Nattitude?
Re: Skenes / Langford Watch (and other 2023 draftees)
« Reply #199 on: August 07, 2025, 09:49:31 am »
Isn't Skenes a Boras client?
According to https://www.spotrac.com/mlb/player/_/id/83150/paul-skenes he's represented by ISE Baseball