Author Topic: PB69 presents "Fire Dave Martinez" (2018)  (Read 56804 times)

0 Members and 13 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Natsinpwc

  • Posts: 28045
Re: Fire Dave Martinez (2018)
« Reply #1800 on: July 29, 2018, 07:47:17 am »
So then why did Weiters bat from the left side against Richards?  Davey and analytics are F'ing the season.
Habit.

Offline mitlen

  • Posts: 66171
  • We had 'em all the way.
Re: Fire Dave Martinez (2018)
« Reply #1801 on: July 29, 2018, 09:08:47 am »

Offline PowerBoater69

  • Posts: 14327
    • Twitter
Re: Fire Dave Martinez (2018)
« Reply #1802 on: July 29, 2018, 09:32:17 am »
Blamed the umps for the bad obstruction call, if you're complaining about the umps you're a loser, sets the tone for the team, it's not our fault.

Offline UMDNats

  • Posts: 18070
Re: Fire Dave Martinez (2018)
« Reply #1803 on: July 29, 2018, 09:33:21 am »
Blamed the umps for the bad obstruction call, if you're complaining about the umps you're a loser, sets the tone for the team, it's not our fault.

first manager ever to be pissed off about the umps!

Offline UMDNats

  • Posts: 18070
Re: Fire Dave Martinez (2018)
« Reply #1804 on: July 29, 2018, 09:34:55 am »
Blamed the umps for the bad obstruction call, if you're complaining about the umps you're a loser, sets the tone for the team, it's not our fault.

https://abcnews.go.com/Sports/reviewable-gaffe-umpire-results-aj-hinch-ejection-indians/story?id=41952645

LOSER - AJ Hinch

https://wgntv.com/2017/08/17/a-furious-joe-maddon-lets-loose-on-umpires-during-and-after-the-cubs-win-over-the-reds/

LOSER - Joe Maddon


WINNER - PB69


Offline PowerBoater69

  • Posts: 14327
    • Twitter
Re: Fire Dave Martinez (2018)
« Reply #1806 on: July 29, 2018, 09:39:56 am »
https://abcnews.go.com/Sports/reviewable-gaffe-umpire-results-aj-hinch-ejection-indians/story?id=41952645

LOSER - AJ Hinch

https://wgntv.com/2017/08/17/a-furious-joe-maddon-lets-loose-on-umpires-during-and-after-the-cubs-win-over-the-reds/

LOSER - Joe Maddon


WINNER - PB69

Great examples, perfect examples, both of those guys got ejected. Martinez went back to the dugout and cried to the media after the game. That's why the ump didn't bother conferring with his crew, no respect for Martinez. The Cubs won the game you cited where Maddon got tossed, maybe the Nats would have been more inspired by a manager who didn't give up.

Offline Ray D

  • Posts: 10073
Re: Fire Dave Martinez (2018)
« Reply #1807 on: July 29, 2018, 09:40:08 am »
Blamed the umps for the bad obstruction call, if you're complaining about the umps you're a loser, sets the tone for the team, it's not our fault.
If you blame the ump for a loss you're a loser.  Complaining about the umpiring itself doesn't make you a loser.  It was a bad call.

Offline UMDNats

  • Posts: 18070
Re: Fire Dave Martinez (2018)
« Reply #1808 on: July 29, 2018, 09:41:23 am »
Great examples, perfect examples, both of those guys got ejected. Martinez went back to the dugout and cried to the media after the game. That's why the ump didn't bother conferring with his crew, no respect for Martinez.

In the link I provided Maddon went off after the game to the media. Try again.

Quote
“To influence a game like that is wrong. Listen, the guy is a good guy, I think he’s a good umpire, but I’m not going to concede consistently to these guys. You can’t make that mistake like that.”

Online varoadking

  • Posts: 30963
  • King of Goodness
Re: Fire Dave Martinez (2018)
« Reply #1809 on: July 29, 2018, 09:43:44 am »
If you blame the ump for a loss you're a loser.  Complaining about the umpiring itself doesn't make you a loser.  It was a bad call.

The call followed the letter of the rules as I understood them...good call...

Offline PowerBoater69

  • Posts: 14327
    • Twitter
Re: Fire Dave Martinez (2018)
« Reply #1810 on: July 29, 2018, 09:45:02 am »
In the link I provided Maddon went off after the game to the media. Try again.


After he got ejected "he was thrown out in 15 seconds".

Offline Ray D

  • Posts: 10073
Re: Fire Dave Martinez (2018)
« Reply #1811 on: July 29, 2018, 09:45:17 am »

Then in the 10th, I was yelling at the TV, don't bring in the 5th infielder with no outs. 
This is a strategy that has gained favor in recent years which I think it's sound and the right thing to do last night.  It's based on the assumption that in that situation there is a 95% or better chance that if the hitter is able to hit a ball to the outfield the run is going to score.  You could ever bring in a sixth infielder except it would overcrowd the infield.

Offline Ray D

  • Posts: 10073
Re: Fire Dave Martinez (2018)
« Reply #1812 on: July 29, 2018, 09:46:32 am »
The call followed the letter of the rules as I understood them...good call...
What I saw was the catcher making a legitimate attempt to field the ball. In that case he has "right of way".  Did I see it wrong?

Offline PowerBoater69

  • Posts: 14327
    • Twitter
Re: Fire Dave Martinez (2018)
« Reply #1813 on: July 29, 2018, 09:48:12 am »
If you blame the ump for a loss you're a loser.  Complaining about the umpiring itself doesn't make you a loser.  It was a bad call.

Seemed like he was pinning the loss on the ump to me. Classic blame shift, worst thing a manager can do, the whole team learns that bad performance is acceptable if it's someone else's fault.

Offline PowerBoater69

  • Posts: 14327
    • Twitter
Re: Fire Dave Martinez (2018)
« Reply #1814 on: July 29, 2018, 09:50:09 am »
What I saw was the catcher making a legitimate attempt to field the ball. In that case he has "right of way".  Did I see it wrong?

I think that you have it correct, bad call. But if you score one run in ten innings all it takes is one blown call to lose the game.

Offline Ray D

  • Posts: 10073
Re: Fire Dave Martinez (2018)
« Reply #1815 on: July 29, 2018, 09:52:49 am »
Seemed like he was pinning the loss on the ump to me. Classic blame shift, worst thing a manager can do, the whole team learns that bad performance is acceptable if it's someone else's fault.
What did he actually say?

Offline PowerBoater69

  • Posts: 14327
    • Twitter
Re: Fire Dave Martinez (2018)
« Reply #1816 on: July 29, 2018, 10:05:17 am »
What did he actually say?

From Zuckerman
Quote
“He said it was obstruction. And clearly the rule states that it’s not obstruction,” Martinez said. “If he deemed he was able to be safe, yeah we have an argument. But there was no way he was going to be safe. No way. The fact of the matter that he said he knew the rules and was clear about knowing the rules after I asked him to reconvene with Angel (Hernandez) and those guys, and he said no. Then you know what? He screwed up. Plain and simple.

“I’m not going to sit here and argue about it, but that’s not what the rule states. If anything, the defensive team has the right of way to go field the ball. He just went on Rojas’ finger-pointing that he obstructed him to run. I don’t even think he really was going to run. That was just a bad call, period.”

http://www.masnsports.com/nationals-pastime/2018/07/nats-left-frustrated-by-10-inning-loss-on-multiple-levels.html

Offline Greg_SRT

  • Posts: 4030
  • Fun while it lasted
Re: Fire Dave Martinez (2018)
« Reply #1817 on: July 29, 2018, 10:06:05 am »
Disagree. Dave made the right moves during the game.

Also yes the Ump got it wrong. Kieboom was trying to field the ball. It was a sacrifice bunt. Miami team expected to take the out and get the winning run to second with 1 out. The catcher has the right to try and field the ball.

Also Harper needs to shut it with the Realmuto should be on our team crap. I bet the Nationals would be more free to trade away Robles if they knew Harper was staying.

Offline welch

  • Posts: 18118
  • The Sweetest Right Handed Swing in 1950s Baseball
Re: Fire Dave Martinez (2018)
« Reply #1818 on: July 29, 2018, 10:10:32 am »
Did Marytinez consider having MAT bunt with one out, 1B holding the runner, and the other IF's bunched on the left side?

Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 76956
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: Fire Dave Martinez (2018)
« Reply #1819 on: July 29, 2018, 10:21:38 am »
The call followed the letter of the rules as I understood them...good call...



I believe that at home plate the batter turned runner has the right of way so I also think it was the right call.

Offline Ray D

  • Posts: 10073
Re: Fire Dave Martinez (2018)
« Reply #1820 on: July 29, 2018, 10:39:13 am »


I believe that at home plate the batter turned runner has the right of way so I also think it was the right call.
And I think he has the right of way only if he's outside the baseline (in foul territory). I don't think that was the case.

Online varoadking

  • Posts: 30963
  • King of Goodness
Re: Fire Dave Martinez (2018)
« Reply #1821 on: July 29, 2018, 10:44:58 am »
And I think he has the right of way only if he's outside the baseline (in foul territory). I don't think that was the case.

Official Baseball Rule 2.00 defines obstruction as:

The act of a fielder who, while not in possession of the ball and not in the act of fielding the ball, impedes the progress of any runner.


Offline mitlen

  • Posts: 66171
  • We had 'em all the way.
Re: Fire Dave Martinez (2018)
« Reply #1822 on: July 29, 2018, 10:46:18 am »
Official Baseball Rule 2.00 defines obstruction as:

The act of a fielder who, while not in possession of the ball and not in the act of fielding the ball, impedes the progress of any runner.



Can someone post the rule with a video of the play?

Offline trangert418

  • Posts: 3609
  • Quit Clowning Around
Re: Fire Dave Martinez (2018)
« Reply #1823 on: July 29, 2018, 11:46:25 am »
Based on this rule I'd say it was the wrong call:

Rule 6.01(a)(10) to 6.01(a)(11)

Rule 6.01(a )(10) Comment: When a catcher and batter-runner
going to first base have contact when the catcher is fielding the
ball, there is generally no violation and nothing should be
called. “Obstruction” by a fielder attempting to field a ball
should be called only in very flagrant and violent cases
because the rules give him the right of way, but of course such
“right of way” is not a license to, for example, intentionally
trip a runner even though fielding the ball. If the catcher is
fielding the ball and any fielder, including the pitcher, obstructs
a runner going to first base, “obstruction” shall be called and
the base runner awarded first base.

Offline Ray D

  • Posts: 10073
Re: Fire Dave Martinez (2018)
« Reply #1824 on: July 29, 2018, 12:17:39 pm »
Official Baseball Rule 2.00 defines obstruction as:

The act of a fielder who, while not in possession of the ball and not in the act of fielding the ball, impedes the progress of any runner.



"Act of fielding the ball".  Seems to be the key phrase.