Author Topic: The Bryce Harper Compendium (2015)  (Read 158607 times)

0 Members and 97 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Ray D

  • Posts: 10073
Re: The Bryce Harper Compendium (2015)
« Reply #2325 on: October 13, 2015, 10:02:14 am »
:spit:

Watch Big Love (should be available on Netflix).  You'll see how expensive it is to support three wives.

Offline Slateman

  • Posts: 66803
  • THE SUMMONER OF THE REVERSE JINX
Re: The Bryce Harper Compendium (2015)
« Reply #2326 on: October 13, 2015, 10:18:03 am »
start with $390 million over 13 and go from there.  That's $30 million a year versus the $25 million that Stanton received.
Trout is getting 25 million a year to be a free agent at age 28. Going to need way more than 30 million.

At this point, try and get him to sign a similar deal, if not, trade him.

Offline sizzlin

  • Posts: 1212
Re: The Bryce Harper Compendium (2015)
« Reply #2327 on: October 13, 2015, 10:22:09 am »
Would you trade Harper for Stanton, considering Stanton is signed for the rest of his career already?

Offline Ray D

  • Posts: 10073
Re: The Bryce Harper Compendium (2015)
« Reply #2328 on: October 13, 2015, 10:22:22 am »
At this point, try and get him to sign a similar deal, if not, trade him.
Count me in the sign him or trade him camp.

Offline HalfSmokes

  • Posts: 21927
Re: The Bryce Harper Compendium (2015)
« Reply #2329 on: October 13, 2015, 10:24:39 am »
hang on for at least another year if not two- unless you really think this fan base is ready for another rebuild (an ownership is ready to tolerate one a season after shelling out $200 million for an ace)

Offline Ray D

  • Posts: 10073
Re: The Bryce Harper Compendium (2015)
« Reply #2330 on: October 13, 2015, 01:42:42 pm »
hang on for at least another year if not two- unless you really think this fan base is ready for another rebuild
When I suggest trading him I'm not suggesting trading him for prospects or trading him for less than his full value - which is pretty substantial.  Harper for Trout comes to mind.

Offline Slateman

  • Posts: 66803
  • THE SUMMONER OF THE REVERSE JINX
Re: The Bryce Harper Compendium (2015)
« Reply #2331 on: October 13, 2015, 01:46:04 pm »
When I suggest trading him I'm not suggesting trading him for prospects or trading him for less than his full value - which is pretty substantial.  Harper for Trout comes to mind.

 :roll:

You trade him for prospects/young cost controlled talent. Why would the Angels even consider that trading for Harper?

Offline Ray D

  • Posts: 10073
Re: The Bryce Harper Compendium (2015)
« Reply #2332 on: October 13, 2015, 01:51:36 pm »
:roll:

 Why would the Angels even consider that trading for Harper?

Only because the Angels do stupid things. (Josh Hamilton for example.)

Offline Slateman

  • Posts: 66803
  • THE SUMMONER OF THE REVERSE JINX
Re: The Bryce Harper Compendium (2015)
« Reply #2333 on: October 14, 2015, 07:41:35 am »
Only because the Angels do stupid things. (Josh Hamilton for example.)
They're not that stupid.

Offline zimm_da_kid

  • Posts: 8146
  • The one true ace
Re: The Bryce Harper Compendium (2015)
« Reply #2334 on: October 14, 2015, 03:30:01 pm »
They're not that stupid.

you have no way of knowing that.

Offline Mr Clean

  • Posts: 4109
Re: The Bryce Harper Compendium (2015)
« Reply #2335 on: October 16, 2015, 09:57:17 am »
Happy birthday Bryce!

Offline PC

  • Posts: 47236
Re: The Bryce Harper Compendium (2015)
« Reply #2336 on: October 18, 2015, 10:06:08 pm »

Offline chritter

  • Posts: 50
Re: The Bryce Harper Compendium (2015)
« Reply #2337 on: October 21, 2015, 01:04:15 am »
Bryce Harper is the best offensive player in the NL. You wanna trade him? Trade him for serious pitching. Pitching wins championships.

I wouldn't trade him, ever. I'd pay him whatever millions he wants. Players like that come along once in a lifetime, if you can keep them under contract, if they want to play where you are, you're doing your job, as a GM.

No one ever goes to buy peanuts when Harper is at bat.

Offline dshawg77

  • Posts: 711
Re: The Bryce Harper Compendium (2015)
« Reply #2338 on: October 21, 2015, 09:48:41 am »
I know Bryce wants to play for the Yankees and all but can someone tell him to change his walk up song. I LOVE Frank Sinatra being part-Italian and all, but come on. That's crazy. Who approved that?

Offline Mr Clean

  • Posts: 4109
Re: The Bryce Harper Compendium (2015)
« Reply #2339 on: October 31, 2015, 07:10:58 pm »

Offline PC

  • Posts: 47236
Re: The Bryce Harper Compendium (2015)
« Reply #2340 on: October 31, 2015, 07:19:00 pm »

Offline PC

  • Posts: 47236
Re: The Bryce Harper Compendium (2015)
« Reply #2341 on: October 31, 2015, 07:19:45 pm »

Offline PC

  • Posts: 47236
Re: The Bryce Harper Compendium (2015)
« Reply #2342 on: October 31, 2015, 07:24:41 pm »
Quote
Enrique Rojas
ESPNdeportes


Josh Donaldson, de Toronto Blue Jays, y Bryce Harper, de Washington Nationals, ganadores del Premio Hank Aaron del 2015 en Liga Americana y Liga Nacional, respectivamente, anunció MLB. Harper no pudo estar presente en presentación en Citi Field antes del juego 4 de la Serie Mundial, pero aceptó el reconocimiento con un video-mensaje.

In English

Josh Donaldson, Toronto Blue Jays, and Bryce Harper, Washington Nationals, winners of the Hank Aaron award in 2015 in the American League and National League, respectively, announced MLB. Harper could not be present at presentation at Citi Field before game 4 of the world series, but accepted the recognition with a video message.

Offline PC

  • Posts: 47236
Re: The Bryce Harper Compendium (2015)
« Reply #2343 on: October 31, 2015, 07:25:28 pm »
In English

Josh Donaldson, Toronto Blue Jays, and Bryce Harper, Washington Nationals, winners of the Hank Aaron award in 2015 in the American League and National League, respectively, announced MLB. Harper could not be present at presentation at Citi Field before game 4 of the world series, but accepted the recognition with a video message.

He COULD have been there...instead of being in a pumpkin patch cavorting with Kay Varner!!!

Offline JCA-CrystalCity

  • Global Moderator
  • ****
  • Posts: 45791
  • Platoon - not just a movie, a baseball obsession
Re: The Bryce Harper Compendium (2015)
« Reply #2344 on: October 31, 2015, 08:58:41 pm »
He COULD have been there..
You suppose if he showed, he would have gotten booed by the Mets fans?

Offline PC

  • Posts: 47236
Re: The Bryce Harper Compendium (2015)
« Reply #2345 on: October 31, 2015, 09:05:36 pm »
You suppose if he showed, he would have gotten booed by the Mets fans?

Absolutely.

Offline Slateman

  • Posts: 66803
  • THE SUMMONER OF THE REVERSE JINX
Re: The Bryce Harper Compendium (2015)
« Reply #2346 on: October 31, 2015, 11:45:26 pm »
Bryce Harper is the best offensive player in the NL. You wanna trade him? Trade him for serious pitching. Pitching wins championships.

I wouldn't trade him, ever. I'd pay him whatever millions he wants. Players like that come along once in a lifetime, if you can keep them under contract, if they want to play where you are, you're doing your job, as a GM.

No one ever goes to buy peanuts when Harper is at bat.

People to to games to watch winners.

Without major roster overhaul, the Nats are going nowhere next season.

Offline Ray D

  • Posts: 10073
Re: The Bryce Harper Compendium (2015)
« Reply #2347 on: November 01, 2015, 10:49:51 am »
People to to games to watch winners.

Without major roster overhaul, the Nats are going nowhere next season.

So you advocate trading him?

Offline Slateman

  • Posts: 66803
  • THE SUMMONER OF THE REVERSE JINX
Re: The Bryce Harper Compendium (2015)
« Reply #2348 on: November 01, 2015, 11:35:43 am »
So you advocate trading him?
Yes. He's done here after the 2018 season. It's obvious he hates it here. It's obvious that he's the kind of guy that is hard to like.

It's also becoming obvious that superstar position players can't win you a championship alone. Donaldson needed two other guys hitting 40 homers as well as Tulo and Price. Trout and the Angels have done nothing. Goldschmidt is wallowing in Arizona. Votta has had little to no success in Cincy. McCutchen and Cabrera are the only ones who have had success, and that has a lot to do with having very good/great teams built up around them.

Learners aren't willing to go over the luxury tax. They're already fretting about money and the result is we'll be paying Max Scherzer seven years after he leaves. I find it highly doubtful the Learners will allow Rizzo to spend a lot of money this offseason. And in many ways, Rizzo  already screwed the pooch after last offseason, by not addressing the team's needs and instead, signing Max.

You look at the teams making the playoffs and doing well, none of them have a superstar, but instead, they have 5-7 very good players. The Nationals really don't. They ahve two guys who are never healthy. They have Rendon who may turn out to be an injury case. And Harper. That's it. EVeryone else is average at best. So either your pitching has to be amazing, like the Mets, or you have to get more good players. We could be like the Pirates and Cardinals and draft really well, develop really well, and keep your team stocked with young, quality controllable talent. If Rizzo had started that two years ago, we'd be in a lot better shape.

I just think that the contract that Harper will command will cripple the team's payroll. You will basically force the GM to play moneyball with the rest of the roster. And, frankly, one hitter just doesn't do enough, particularly when his "protection" is on the DL. So... trade him. Get everything you can out of him now or after next season. Set the Nationals up  for the next five to ten years with a ton of very good, cost controlled talent.

Offline UMDNats

  • Posts: 18070
Re: The Bryce Harper Compendium (2015)
« Reply #2349 on: November 01, 2015, 11:38:37 am »
Yes. He's done here after the 2018 season. It's obvious he hates it here. It's obvious that he's the kind of guy that is hard to like.


Man, who knew we had a guy so locked-in to the clubhouse and Bryce Harper on our own forum?

tells us more bryce stories