Author Topic: Washington Redskins thread (2013)  (Read 101461 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline PC

  • Posts: 47236
Re: Washington Redskins thread (2013)
« Reply #2350 on: December 15, 2013, 04:13:33 pm »
That was a worse decision than Zorn's fake field goal.

Offline Terpfan76

  • Posts: 3924
  • ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ
Re: Washington Redskins thread (2013)
« Reply #2351 on: December 15, 2013, 04:18:16 pm »
It makes absolutely no sense to go for two.  The Falcons offense and defense is terrible. There was no reason we couldn't win in overtime.

Dude... Seriously? You're playing for pride only. I really don't mind going for 2. Either way, its not like a win gets us in the post season.

Offline PC

  • Posts: 47236
Re: Washington Redskins thread (2013)
« Reply #2352 on: December 15, 2013, 04:20:29 pm »
Dude... Seriously? You're playing for pride only. I really don't mind going for 2. Either way, its not like a win gets us in the post season.

I'm playing for the Rams to not get the second (or FIRST!!!) pick in the draft.

Offline HalfSmokes

  • Posts: 21923
Re: Washington Redskins thread (2013)
« Reply #2353 on: December 15, 2013, 04:22:03 pm »
I'm playing for the Rams to not get the second (or FIRST!!!) pick in the draft.

They really made a good choice going with skins over browns

Offline cmdterps44

  • Posts: 15551
  • Future
Re: Washington Redskins thread (2013)
« Reply #2354 on: December 15, 2013, 04:22:18 pm »
I didn't mind the call for two. Oh well.

Offline Terpfan76

  • Posts: 3924
  • ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ
Re: Washington Redskins thread (2013)
« Reply #2355 on: December 15, 2013, 04:23:21 pm »
I'm playing for the Rams to not get the second (or FIRST!!!) pick in the draft.


yup... :roll:

Offline madj55

  • Posts: 7779
Re: Washington Redskins thread (2013)
« Reply #2356 on: December 15, 2013, 04:24:52 pm »
Not surprised they went for two, Shanahan wanted to go home.

Offline Slateman

  • Posts: 66703
  • THE SUMMONER OF THE REVERSE JINX
Re: Washington Redskins thread (2013)
« Reply #2357 on: December 15, 2013, 04:38:59 pm »
I'm playing for the Rams to not get the second (or FIRST!!!) pick in the draft.
Why do you care?

Offline PC

  • Posts: 47236
Re: Washington Redskins thread (2013)
« Reply #2358 on: December 15, 2013, 04:40:02 pm »

Offline Slateman

  • Posts: 66703
  • THE SUMMONER OF THE REVERSE JINX
Re: Washington Redskins thread (2013)
« Reply #2359 on: December 15, 2013, 04:42:54 pm »
Small accomplishments.
I'd rather have the best possible draft position

Offline Terpfan76

  • Posts: 3924
  • ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ
Re: Washington Redskins thread (2013)
« Reply #2360 on: December 15, 2013, 04:49:13 pm »
I'd rather have the best possible draft position

first pick... Second round, but still ;) :lol:

Offline Slateman

  • Posts: 66703
  • THE SUMMONER OF THE REVERSE JINX
Re: Washington Redskins thread (2013)
« Reply #2361 on: December 15, 2013, 04:54:35 pm »
first pick... Second round, but still ;) :lol:

Fine by me

Offline HalfSmokes

  • Posts: 21923
Re: Washington Redskins thread (2013)
« Reply #2362 on: December 15, 2013, 05:03:37 pm »
As long as shanny doesn't get a chance to screw it up

Offline PC

  • Posts: 47236
Re: Washington Redskins thread (2013)
« Reply #2363 on: December 15, 2013, 05:16:42 pm »

Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 76956
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: Washington Redskins thread (2013)
« Reply #2364 on: December 15, 2013, 05:52:33 pm »
Spider is having a rough time watching Orakpo play like a stud.


ONE of the differences between you and me is that I can acknowledge when people play well AND when they don't. The reason they were able to stay in this game is because of the defensive front 7. Both Orakpo and Kerrigan played well today. But so did everyone else on the first two levels of the defense. You on the other hand ignore games when Orakpo had a total of two tackles in three games and countered by quoting stats from his rookie season or said crap about his making multiple pro bowls. Vince Young needs to add multiple pro bowls to his resume so he wouldn't have to be sitting at home. While we're at it so should Matt Schaub because according to the likes of you that merits him stud status.


Offline Slateman

  • Posts: 66703
  • THE SUMMONER OF THE REVERSE JINX
Re: Washington Redskins thread (2013)
« Reply #2365 on: December 15, 2013, 05:53:11 pm »

Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 76956
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: Washington Redskins thread (2013)
« Reply #2366 on: December 15, 2013, 05:54:51 pm »
Teams Griffin has played against who give up more PPG than the Falcons:

Bears
Eagles
Cowboys

Teams Griffin played against who give up more passing YPG:

Packers
Lions
Broncos
Chargers
Eagles
Cowboys
Vikings

That damn Kirk, only beating up on bad teams. Not facing powerhouses like Lord Griffin.

Good stuff.  :clap:

I was annoyed at how they said Garcon had tied the Redskins franchise record for receptions in one season and over an hour later said he had taken first place all by himself with 96 catches. Nevermind that Art Monk had 106 receptions in 1984.  :smh:

Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 76956
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: Washington Redskins thread (2013)
« Reply #2367 on: December 15, 2013, 05:55:01 pm »
I see the Griffin jackasss are out in full force trying to minimize what Cousins did today. The reality is that Cousins has an infinitely better understanding of playing QB than Griffin. The problem with a lit of great athletes who play QB is that they rely on their athleticism so much in their ascent to the NFL that they neglect honing their craft and it shows when they are actually forced to play QB at the pro level. It is so clear that Cousins is better (not quite where he should be yet) at pre snap reads than Griffin and he is also more decisive in where he needs to go after the snap. He moves through his progressions well (Griffin seldom goes beyond his first or second option) and is a fraction quicker than Griffin at delivering the football. He was late on the second interception and it cost him. He also left a couple plays on the field where he had open field to run for long chunks and move the chains. That's an important part of the game that he needs to take advantage of. I felt they should've made an adjustment on the two point conversion due to the front the Falcons offered. The MLB was keying Helu so they should've sent Helu in motion to the right and ran the QB draw with an option to throw. With the front they were showing the MLB either has to be forced to move out of the box to account for Helu and leave the middle wide open or he stays in the middle and Helu is unaccounted for in the flat.

Having said that, there 's no need to get overly excited about the way Cousins played today. The enthusiasm should be tempered with the reality that it's just one game and Cousins has a long way to go still. I would say this whole thing will work itself out and that the two will battle it out but I don't think that will be the case. I believe Griffin will demand (not publicly) that Cousins be traded in the offseason.

Offline HalfSmokes

  • Posts: 21923
Re: Washington Redskins thread (2013)
« Reply #2368 on: December 15, 2013, 05:58:48 pm »
I don't see how it works itself out with two young QBs who both need reps to reach their potential

Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 76956
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: Washington Redskins thread (2013)
« Reply #2369 on: December 15, 2013, 06:01:39 pm »
I agree we gave up way too much for RG3, but no one was saying this crap last year.

:hysterical:  Last year they catered to him (correctly) and his lack of QB skills and understanding of the position by installing a college type system. It caught defenses off guard and it led to his fantastic season. This season Griffin started out late and wasn't 100% for the first 6 or 7 weeks of the season. Add to that the fact that defenses were better prepared for the option read and he was forced to become an actual QB. This is also something he and his father insisted they wanted to do. The result was that he was exposed as someone who is a long way from being an actual QB.

RG3 has the potential to be a star...

Based on what? Subway commercials? The hype that surrounded him coming out of Baylor? You sound like Skip Bayless talking about Tim Tebow.

Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 76956
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: Washington Redskins thread (2013)
« Reply #2370 on: December 15, 2013, 06:02:24 pm »
I don't see how it works itself out with two young QBs who both need reps to reach their potential

I think by the time they played a couple of preseason games you would know who to roll with. But as I said, I don't think we will see any competition so it's moot.

Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 76956
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: Washington Redskins thread (2013)
« Reply #2371 on: December 15, 2013, 06:06:58 pm »
I'm playing for the Rams to not get the second (or FIRST!!!) pick in the draft.

:lmao:  No matter where the pick ends up it's theirs already so hoping it's not the first pick is pointless.

It makes absolutely no sense to go for two.  The Falcons offense and defense is terrible. There was no reason we couldn't win in overtime.

:idiot:

Offline madj55

  • Posts: 7779
Re: Washington Redskins thread (2013)
« Reply #2372 on: December 15, 2013, 06:25:11 pm »
:hysterical:  Last year they catered to him (correctly) and his lack of QB skills and understanding of the position by installing a college type system. It caught defenses off guard and it led to his fantastic season. This season Griffin started out late and wasn't 100% for the first 6 or 7 weeks of the season. Add to that the fact that defenses were better prepared for the option read and he was forced to become an actual QB. This is also something he and his father insisted they wanted to do. The result was that he was exposed as someone who is a long way from being an actual QB.

Based on what? Subway commercials? The hype that surrounded him coming out of Baylor? You sound like Skip Bayless talking about Tim Tebow.

No, based on his freaking ability. The guy has a cannon for an arm, can extend plays, and up until this year he was very accurate with the ball and didn't make many mental mistakes. He regressed this year with his decision making, stared down receivers too long, and also has held onto the ball too long. All of those things are coachable though and can be fixed. Missing the entire off-season is what's held him back from taking the next step as a QB. RG3 has all the tools to be a star QB, it's just a matter of applying them. Hopefully he goes low profile this off-season and masters his craft, cause if so he's the QB that gives this team the best chance at winning.

Also, unfortunately I've got a feeling that Shanahan isn't going anywhere...which is really no bueno. We're gonna be a 6 win team next year.

Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 76956
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: Washington Redskins thread (2013)
« Reply #2373 on: December 15, 2013, 07:21:07 pm »
The guy has a cannon for an arm, can extend plays, and up until this year he was very accurate with the ball and didn't make many mental mistakes.

I'm going to ignore the "cannon for an arm" bullcrap. He's only been accurate (and we can only base this on past performance) when he played in a college system that left WR's wide open. I don't see that system surviving in the NFL for the long run. If it did then Tim Tebow can be allowed back into the league. If you could run that system successfully year in and year out then fine because it makes decision making easy and it has the potential to leave receivers wide open but if not then he has to show me he can learn to play the game at this level. I hope it happens because the success of my team depends on it but I need to see it to believe it.

No, based on his freaking ability.

What ability? A "cannon arm"? We can name many who had cannon arms but were failures and many who didn't have cannon arms but were excellent QB's. Accurately hitting wide open receivers (up until this year :rofl:)? Aside from Tim Tebow, that isn't how you measure a QB;s accuracy. His ability to run and extend plays? He failed to extend plays this season. Besides, what you described is Mike Vick and Vick has never been much more than hype.

Offline Terpfan76

  • Posts: 3924
  • ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ
Re: Washington Redskins thread (2013)
« Reply #2374 on: December 15, 2013, 07:39:40 pm »
I suspect that, if Cousins finishes the season looking good, they'll trade him and go with Griffin who should gave no excuse for not playing better next year. I still can't believe Compton isn't getting looks over Polumbus.

I agree that Cousins is the superior QB as far as being advanced in the cerebral aspect of the game. To be honest, if its believed that he's the better pro going forward and someone offers a "Richardson to the Colts" type deal, I wouldn't have a problem with it. I really like Griffin and believe that he can be a star but at this point, I want the best team possible. If that means moving RGIII, so be it. And before it starts, I don't for a second see anything like that happening if for no other reason than its admitting you made a bad move and that its a bit soon to be throwing in the towel.