Author Topic: Washington Redskins thread (2013)  (Read 101411 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Online Smithian

  • Posts: 12271
  • Sunshine Squad 2025
Re: Washington Redskins thread (2013)
« Reply #2200 on: December 11, 2013, 02:26:24 pm »
I hope RGIII becomes everything he can be, but you gotta wonder if the "let me be me" Griffin would be willing to do that, or if he'd just run to Danny.

I think RGIII acted like a jackass this past offseason. I am going to assume he learns from that, but if he doesn't then next time around the coach won't be the piece of the puzzle being replaced.

Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 76956
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: Washington Redskins thread (2013)
« Reply #2201 on: December 11, 2013, 02:26:27 pm »
Has there ever been a QB who actually learned to read progressions and become a pocket passer while starting in the NFL?

All the good ones have had to learn to read progressions to a degree. It's just that, because of the systems they come from, Griffin has more to learn.

Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 76956
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: Washington Redskins thread (2013)
« Reply #2202 on: December 11, 2013, 02:28:10 pm »
No coach will ask RGIII to become a pocket passer.

:hysterical: 


Offline HalfSmokes

  • Posts: 21923
Re: Washington Redskins thread (2013)
« Reply #2203 on: December 11, 2013, 02:28:40 pm »
This season has sucked for everyone and the offense is broken. The players have quit. Can't write a book about any player from this season alone. No coach will ask RGIII to become a pocket passer. He'll always be an athletic guy who can win a game with his legs. He has to improve from the pocket, but he doesn't have to live there. That is understood.

And yes, a lot of quarterbacks have improved from year 2 to 3. It is crazy to act like any player will stop developing after their second season.

there is a difference between developing (i.e. improving on skills one already possesses) and learning a completely new aspect of the system. As far as him winning games on his legs, he's 6-2 223 with an acl knee that has already been torn twice- if he's having to win games on his legs, he better do it soon because he's not going to have a long career

Offline mitlen

  • Posts: 66171
  • We had 'em all the way.
Re: Washington Redskins thread (2013)
« Reply #2204 on: December 11, 2013, 02:28:42 pm »
And yes, a lot of quarterbacks have improved from year 2 to 3. It is crazy to act like any player will stop developing after their second season.

You're right.

Terry Bradshaw  ...   Joe Gilliam and Terry Hanratty and Chuck Noll challenged him until his 4th or 5th year.   He turned out OK.   RGIII will be fine.   

Of course the 'skins may need a couple of good drafts and the picks are gone.   It helped him immeasurably to have Swann and Stallworth in the '74 draft.

Online Smithian

  • Posts: 12271
  • Sunshine Squad 2025
Re: Washington Redskins thread (2013)
« Reply #2205 on: December 11, 2013, 02:39:48 pm »
You're right.

Terry Bradshaw  ...   Joe Gilliam and Terry Hanratty and Chuck Noll challenged him until his 4th or 5th year.   He turned out OK.   RGIII will be fine.   

Of course the 'skins may need a couple of good drafts and the picks are gone.   It helped him immeasurably to have Swann and Stallworth in the '74 draft.
If the Redskins are smart they can add talent. This past draft they still added contributors in Reed and Amerson and some decent young guys in Rambo and Jenkins. Phillip Thomas may be something but he is out for season. The RGIII draft, aside from Morris/Cousins, was bad after the first.

Hopefully the '14 draft is more like the '13 one and then in '15 it is back to normal.

Offline mitlen

  • Posts: 66171
  • We had 'em all the way.
Re: Washington Redskins thread (2013)
« Reply #2206 on: December 11, 2013, 02:42:15 pm »
"At the end of the day" must be the operative phrase today.

Offline HalfSmokes

  • Posts: 21923
Re: Washington Redskins thread (2013)
« Reply #2207 on: December 11, 2013, 02:50:49 pm »
If the Redskins are smart they can add talent. This past draft they still added contributors in Reed and Amerson and some decent young guys in Rambo and Jenkins. Phillip Thomas may be something but he is out for season. The RGIII draft, aside from Morris/Cousins, was bad after the first.

Hopefully the '14 draft is more like the '13 one and then in '15 it is back to normal.

most terrible teams don't count adding a couple of players per draft as a good thing. The 2010 draft yielded one player who is currently starting. 2011 was great, we got 4 starters, but, on a decent team, are Gomes or Jenkins actually starting?, 2012, 2 starters, 2013, 2 starters (assuming Reed is ever healthy). The guys who are starting may be great, but considering the void of talent on the team, the fact that more guys from those drafts aren't starting makes me very glad that Shanny has had his last draft with the skins.

Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 76956
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: Washington Redskins thread (2013)
« Reply #2208 on: December 11, 2013, 02:56:03 pm »
and some decent young guys in Rambo and Jenkins.

It remains to be seen with Rambo. Right now it doesn't look like he can tackle. As for Jenkins, how do you know? He's only been active 4 games and hardly ever got on the field. Didn't have a single tackle and he was so undisciplined in pass rush that he was sent back to the inactive list.

Offline Terpfan76

  • Posts: 3924
  • ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ
Re: Washington Redskins thread (2013)
« Reply #2209 on: December 11, 2013, 03:04:38 pm »
:lmao:  Definitely. I think he's waiting for Lovie Smith to be hired to come troll the freak out of us.

He Trolls me by text... jerk :lol:

Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 76956
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: Washington Redskins thread (2013)
« Reply #2210 on: December 11, 2013, 03:10:51 pm »
He Trolls me by text... jerk :lol:

Wallflower trolling is for the weak.  :poke:

Offline Terpfan76

  • Posts: 3924
  • ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ
Re: Washington Redskins thread (2013)
« Reply #2211 on: December 11, 2013, 03:14:10 pm »
I think it's clear that Griffin regressed. I hoped that he'd find his groove as the season moved along but it's become more and more evident, all the off season work, practice and preseason action he missed was huge. I'm actually not against shutting him down. With the way the line has played and the way he has played, he may be better off shutting it down, ending the year healthy and coming back better prepared and without the knee brace.

Offline Terpfan76

  • Posts: 3924
  • ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ
Re: Washington Redskins thread (2013)
« Reply #2212 on: December 11, 2013, 03:15:40 pm »
Wallflower trolling is for the weak.  :poke:

Honestly, I almost wonder if he's become sympathetic to our plight. He knows "Klanahan" is gone and Rex more than likely is as well. He'll have little to hate about the "Landover Foreskins". sigh

Offline HalfSmokes

  • Posts: 21923
Re: Washington Redskins thread (2013)
« Reply #2213 on: December 11, 2013, 03:19:27 pm »
I think it's clear that Griffin regressed. I hoped that he'd find his groove as the season moved along but it's become more and more evident, all the off season work, practice and preseason action he missed was huge. I'm actually not against shutting him down. With the way the line has played and the way he has played, he may be better off shutting it down, ending the year healthy and coming back better prepared and without the knee brace.

you're probably right. Hopefuly cousins doesn't play well enough to start a qb controversy because that's the last thing this team needs at this point

Offline Terpfan76

  • Posts: 3924
  • ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ
Re: Washington Redskins thread (2013)
« Reply #2214 on: December 11, 2013, 03:31:21 pm »
you're probably right. Hopefuly cousins doesn't play well enough to start a qb controversy because that's the last thing this team needs at this point

But if he does play real well, he becomes more valuable as a trade chip. Catch 22 I guess. If he does play well, I trade him and draft another developmental qb.

Offline GburgNatsFan

  • Posts: 22349
  • Let's drink a few for Mathguy.
Re: Washington Redskins thread (2013)
« Reply #2215 on: December 11, 2013, 03:38:02 pm »
I hope Cousins plays like a man on fire and we have a full blown problem picking which is the better QB.  Competition breeds success.

Offline HalfSmokes

  • Posts: 21923
Re: Washington Redskins thread (2013)
« Reply #2216 on: December 11, 2013, 03:40:15 pm »
It's supposedly a rich QB draft, throw in a new coach or GM who may want to see what they have and he may not be tradable. As far as competition, the old 'if you have two quarterbacks, you have none' comes to mind

Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 76956
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: Washington Redskins thread (2013)
« Reply #2217 on: December 11, 2013, 03:46:17 pm »
Honestly, I almost wonder if he's become sympathetic to our plight.



He knows "Klanahan" is gone .

:lmao:


Offline mitlen

  • Posts: 66171
  • We had 'em all the way.
Re: Washington Redskins thread (2013)
« Reply #2218 on: December 11, 2013, 05:31:05 pm »
Really interesting conversation with Vinny Cerrato/Arrington and Dukes on 106.7.

Offline mmzznnxx

  • Posts: 11912
  • lol Nats
Re: Washington Redskins thread (2013)
« Reply #2219 on: December 11, 2013, 05:44:39 pm »
Really interesting conversation with Vinny Cerrato/Arrington and Dukes on 106.7.

Unless it was the three of them having a joint press conference to announce the three of them going to live in silence and seclusion until the rest of time, not interested in what they're selling.

Offline mitlen

  • Posts: 66171
  • We had 'em all the way.
Re: Washington Redskins thread (2013)
« Reply #2220 on: December 11, 2013, 05:50:15 pm »
Unless it was the three of them having a joint press conference to announce the three of them going to live in silence and seclusion until the rest of time, not interested in what they're selling.

I don't have the history with them but they covered a lot of turf.    As an outsider (my disclaimer), I enjoyed the history lesson.    One of the things I found interesting was Vinny's comment that if the lawyers could have found a hole in the contract, Shanny would have been gone Monday as the coach/GM.    Vinny firmly believed Shanny was gone but he would have gotten money.    He has an ironclad contract.   I was also surprised by LaVar's comment that he wasn't a fan of Gibbs.    Whatever his reasons are, that's almost sacrilegious in this town.   All in all, it was a pretty blunt discussion.

Offline HalfSmokes

  • Posts: 21923
Re: Washington Redskins thread (2013)
« Reply #2221 on: December 11, 2013, 05:57:23 pm »
LaVar and Gibbs is pretty public here- he actually bought out his own contract to get away.

Offline mitlen

  • Posts: 66171
  • We had 'em all the way.
Re: Washington Redskins thread (2013)
« Reply #2222 on: December 11, 2013, 05:58:47 pm »
LaVar and Gibbs is pretty public here- he actually bought out his own contract to get away.

I"m in the area but I don't remember/follow the details.   I was probably wondering why the Steelers don't dump Stewart.   :P    Is that how he ended up in NY?

Offline HalfSmokes

  • Posts: 21923
Re: Washington Redskins thread (2013)
« Reply #2223 on: December 11, 2013, 05:59:42 pm »
That's how he ended up in NY?

yep, he cut a $4 million dollar check to the skins

Online Slateman

  • Posts: 66702
  • THE SUMMONER OF THE REVERSE JINX
Re: Washington Redskins thread (2013)
« Reply #2224 on: December 11, 2013, 06:10:58 pm »
Yea, LaVar wanted out. Bad. He also had a failing restaurant in the area. Arrington thought Gibbs was a coward for quitting the way he did. Between that and his conflicts with Greg Williams, Arrington paid the Skins 4+ million to be a free agent.

2001-2003, Lavar was a monster on the field. Too bad. I always felt that after the Skins signed Trotter and Armstead, they should have gone to a 3-4