Pages: 1 ... 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 [46] 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 ... 216   Go Down

Author Topic: Fielder  (Read 288871 times)

0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline MarquisDeSade

  • Posts: 15101
  • Captain Sadness
Re: Fielder.
« Reply #1125 on: January 04, 2012, 08:17:20 pm »
Quote from: deeznatz on January 04, 2012, 08:14:50 pm
LOL, sounds like you might be a little bitter?  I'll trust your opinion.  You guys have been dealing with incompetence and heartbreak for over 100 years.

Bitter?  There's nothing to be bitter about.  Heartbreak, sure, but incompetence?  The only idiotic thing they did was give Soriano a ton of money but the Werthless signing trumps that.
Logged

Offline deeznatz

  • Posts: 1280
    • http://www.amorica.org
Re: Fielder.
« Reply #1126 on: January 04, 2012, 08:20:51 pm »
Well, I'd say such a long championship draught necessarily implies some incompetence along the way.

As for Werth, only time will tell....still has a long time to make the deal look decent, or even good.  And I'll stand by my statement, the Werth signing was more about making a statement.  making it acceptable for a big name guy like Fielder to go to a team that 5 years ago was a total joke.
Logged

Offline MarquisDeSade

  • Posts: 15101
  • Captain Sadness
Re: Fielder.
« Reply #1127 on: January 04, 2012, 08:25:24 pm »
Quote from: deeznatz on January 04, 2012, 08:20:51 pm
Well, I'd say such a long championship draught necessarily implies some incompetence along the way.

Eh, it's baseball and the Cubs.  You spend a couple of afternoons at Wrigley Field under the influence of Old Style and you forget all about the championship droughts. 
Logged

Offline PC

  • Posts: 47236
Re: Fielder.
« Reply #1128 on: January 04, 2012, 08:25:59 pm »
Quote from: cmdterps44 on January 04, 2012, 07:13:54 pm
I'm just tired of constantly searching mlbtr and wnff on my slow ass droid. The thing pisses me off more than having to wait for Prince to sign.

Then get a Windows Phone.  :mg:
Logged

Offline natsfan4evr

  • Posts: 6171
Re: Fielder.
« Reply #1129 on: January 04, 2012, 08:26:03 pm »
Rangers do not seem to be all that interested in Prince

Quote
Daniels also made it clear Tuesday afternoon that the Rangers are not interested in free agent first baseman Prince Fielder. The Rangers are focused on getting something done with pitcher Yu Darvish. They have until Jan. 18. If negotiations fall apart with Darvish, the Rangers might turn their attention to Fielder. But right now the Rangers expect Mitch Moreland to be their first baseman.

http://trsullivan.mlblogs.com/2012/01/04/daniels-on-napoli-fielder-bullpen/
Logged

Offline Nathan

  • Posts: 10726
  • Wow. Such warnings. Very baseball. Moderator Doge.
Re: Fielder.
« Reply #1130 on: January 04, 2012, 08:36:00 pm »
Quote from: PC on January 04, 2012, 08:25:59 pm
Then get a Windows Phone.  :mg:

So that the Windows Phone will piss him off more, and the droid will be preferable in comparison?
Logged

Offline hammondsnats

  • Posts: 37394
Re: Fielder.
« Reply #1131 on: January 04, 2012, 08:37:19 pm »
I am convinced it's really up to how much the Lerners want to pony up.  I really think the ball is in their court.  Whether or not they pull the trigger, we'll see.
Logged

Offline Mr Clean

  • Posts: 4109
Re: Fielder.
« Reply #1132 on: January 04, 2012, 08:41:59 pm »
I bet Davey is pushing hard for Fielder.

Gotta be thinking of the lineup he could have.
Logged

Offline DPMOmaha

  • Posts: 22885
Re: Fielder.
« Reply #1133 on: January 04, 2012, 08:43:24 pm »
Quote from: MarquisDeSade on January 04, 2012, 08:00:32 pm
Yeah, they don't have cheap and incompetent owners.

We don't actually know that yet.  this is their first off season.  They seem to be off to a good start bringing in Theo.
Logged

Offline imref

  • Posts: 47647
  • NG Nattitude?
Re: Fielder.
« Reply #1134 on: January 04, 2012, 08:46:31 pm »
Quote from: Mr Clean on January 04, 2012, 08:41:59 pm
I bet Davey is pushing hard for Fielder.

Gotta be thinking of the lineup he could have.

you are probably right, he's exactly the kind of player Davey wants.

Meanwhile Riggleman is going bat-crazy over the fact that he may have lost the opportunity to potentially double-switch Fielder out 60 times a year for a defensive replacement.
Logged

Offline PC

  • Posts: 47236
Re: Fielder.
« Reply #1135 on: January 04, 2012, 08:49:48 pm »
Quote from: Nathan on January 04, 2012, 08:36:00 pm
So that the Windows Phone will piss him off more, and the droid will be preferable in comparison?

Mango > Ice Cream Sandwich or Honeycomb or Gingerbread....or whatever he's using.
Logged

Offline PANatsFan

  • Posts: 37398
  • dogs in uncensored, nudes in gameday
Re: Fielder.
« Reply #1136 on: January 04, 2012, 08:51:17 pm »
Quote from: hammondsnats on January 04, 2012, 08:37:19 pm
I am convinced it's really up to how much the Lerners want to pony up.  I really think the ball is in their court.  Whether or not they pull the trigger, we'll see.



What if Boras wants a 10 yr deal though? I mean, I doubt it, he loves him some LernerCash (tm).
Logged

Offline hammondsnats

  • Posts: 37394
Re: Fielder.
« Reply #1137 on: January 04, 2012, 08:53:58 pm »
Quote from: PANatsFan on January 04, 2012, 08:51:17 pm


What if Boras wants a 10 yr deal though? I mean, I doubt it, he loves him some LernerCash (tm).

i feel confident in saying fielder ain't getting a 10 year deal.

Logged

Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 76956
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: Fielder.
« Reply #1138 on: January 04, 2012, 08:57:42 pm »
lol
Logged

Offline natsfan4evr

  • Posts: 6171
Re: Fielder.
« Reply #1139 on: January 04, 2012, 09:10:50 pm »
Quote from: imref on January 04, 2012, 08:46:31 pm
you are probably right, he's exactly the kind of player Davey wants.

Meanwhile Riggleman is going bat-crazy over the fact that he may have lost the opportunity to potentially double-switch Fielder out 60 times a year for a defensive replacement.

I bet Riggleman would tell you that he'd rather manage the Pensacola Blue Wahoos...At least he won't feel disrepected managing for class AA.
Logged

Offline sportsfan882

  • Posts: 93631
Re: Fielder.
« Reply #1140 on: January 04, 2012, 09:45:26 pm »
This thread blows, a bunch of fabricated crap by low lifes. Nats won't get Prince, it won't happen
Logged

Offline MarquisDeSade

  • Posts: 15101
  • Captain Sadness
Re: Fielder.
« Reply #1141 on: January 04, 2012, 09:49:46 pm »
Quote from: sportsfan882 on January 04, 2012, 09:45:26 pm
This thread blows, a bunch of fabricated crap by low lifes. Nats won't get Prince, it won't happen

:clap:

Sanity.
Logged

Offline tomterp

  • Global Moderator
  • ****
  • Posts: 33885
  • Hell yes!
Re: Fielder.
« Reply #1142 on: January 04, 2012, 09:49:49 pm »
Quote from: sportsfan882 on January 04, 2012, 09:45:26 pm
This thread blows, a bunch of fabricated crap by low lifes. Nats won't get Prince, it won't happen

 :smh:

SF, don't you know that if your pathetic attempts at reverse karma / anti-jinx / reverse-psychology are too obvious and forced, they are doomed to fail?
Logged

Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 76956
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: Fielder.
« Reply #1143 on: January 04, 2012, 09:57:52 pm »
Quote from: tomterp on January 04, 2012, 09:49:49 pm
:smh:

SF, don't you know that if your pathetic attempts at reverse karma / anti-jinx / reverse-psychology are too obvious and forced, they are doomed to fail?

That makes it even more ridiculous.   :lmao:
Logged

Offline tomterp

  • Global Moderator
  • ****
  • Posts: 33885
  • Hell yes!
Re: Fielder.
« Reply #1144 on: January 04, 2012, 10:00:59 pm »
Quote from: spidernat on January 04, 2012, 09:57:52 pm
That makes it even more ridiculous.   :lmao:

They have to be sincere efforts in order for the anti-jinx powers to gain traction.
Logged

Offline UMDNats

  • Posts: 18070
Re: Fielder.
« Reply #1145 on: January 04, 2012, 10:02:38 pm »
Quote from: sportsfan882 on January 04, 2012, 09:45:26 pm
This thread blows, a bunch of fabricated crap by low lifes. Nats won't get Prince, it won't happen

nice
Logged

Offline Caldo

  • Posts: 6
Re: Fielder.
« Reply #1146 on: January 04, 2012, 10:10:38 pm »
Logged

Offline cmdterps44

  • Posts: 15551
  • Future
Re: Fielder.
« Reply #1147 on: January 04, 2012, 10:13:02 pm »
Quote from: Caldo on January 04, 2012, 10:10:38 pm
the dream didnt come true  :icon_frown:

We have two hours left. You heard it here first!
Logged

Offline InsaneBoost

  • Posts: 1479
  • Censored
Re: Fielder.
« Reply #1148 on: January 04, 2012, 10:16:18 pm »
So have there been any new rumors besides that one guy a couple hours ago with the 7 year talk? While I like the smokescreens to an extent, I also hate them. We need some sourcessss.
Logged

Online JCA-CrystalCity

  • Global Moderator
  • ****
  • Posts: 45872
  • Platoon - not just a movie, a baseball obsession
Re: Fielder.
« Reply #1149 on: January 04, 2012, 10:17:15 pm »
Anyone see Gammons on MLB Network hot stove tonight?  I only caught part of it, but Gammons and the panel discussed "can the Nats afford to keep RZ if they sign Fielder." Gammo and the panel thought it would be unlikely prior to RZ hitting free agency.   

Makes you wonder if the delays in negotiating with RZ's agent is because they want the Prince issue resolved first.   
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 [46] 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 ... 216   Go Up