Author Topic: Nationals @ Mets, Game 2  (Read 57118 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Ali the Baseball Cat

  • Posts: 17858
  • babble on
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 2
« Reply #275: September 13, 2011, 09:38:14 PM »
So they can borrow money at a slightly better interest rate. 
3rd place is a big deal for both of these franchises.  Or at least for the Mets finishing above the Nats is a big deal.

Offline welch

  • Posts: 17697
  • The Sweetest Right Handed Swing in 1950s Baseball
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 2
« Reply #276: September 13, 2011, 09:38:19 PM »
Maybe Davey wants us to compare the width of Severino to that of Coffey???

Offline RobDibblesGhost

  • Posts: 32111
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 2
« Reply #277: September 13, 2011, 09:38:32 PM »
the same coffey who has been pretty good recently?
  He must mean the one who came in and promptly stranded two runners in scoring position last night :lmao:

Offline hammondsnats

  • Posts: 37394
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 2
« Reply #278: September 13, 2011, 09:39:09 PM »
  He must mean the one who came in and promptly stranded two runners in scoring position last night :lmao:

he was awesome last night, agreed.

Offline welch

  • Posts: 17697
  • The Sweetest Right Handed Swing in 1950s Baseball
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 2
« Reply #279: September 13, 2011, 09:39:40 PM »
"I haven't seen Davey make pitching changes since '85 in that 19 inning game" says Ron Darling.

Offline RobDibblesGhost

  • Posts: 32111
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 2
« Reply #280: September 13, 2011, 09:40:01 PM »
Huh, I didn't know Coffey was our best pitcher when it comes to stranding inherited runners.

Offline RobDibblesGhost

  • Posts: 32111
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 2
« Reply #281: September 13, 2011, 09:40:40 PM »
K!!!

Offline nats2playoffs

  • Posts: 23921
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 2
« Reply #282: September 13, 2011, 09:40:42 PM »
Why isn't Clippard pitching? He had two easy innings last night...

 :lmao:
  ...He can't pitch 2 innings every night...

Is he a switch pitcher?  He's got 2 arms, hasn't he? 
BUT... does he have a glove for a southpaw?


SPOILER: That's how Rocky beat Mr. T.

Offline Ali the Baseball Cat

  • Posts: 17858
  • babble on
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 2
« Reply #283: September 13, 2011, 09:40:47 PM »
Coffey's 40DD pulchritude towers over Wright. 

Offline hammondsnats

  • Posts: 37394
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 2
« Reply #284: September 13, 2011, 09:41:03 PM »
PEANUT BUTTER COFFEE TIME!!!   :metal: :judge: :woop:

Offline Slateman

  • Posts: 66148
  • THE SUMMONER OF THE REVERSE JINX
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 2
« Reply #285: September 13, 2011, 09:41:13 PM »
Davey sucks, Coffey should be far away from this game. Loser

You were saying?

Offline RobDibblesGhost

  • Posts: 32111
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 2
« Reply #286: September 13, 2011, 09:41:17 PM »
Davey sucks, Coffey should be far away from this game. Loser

:lmao: :lmao: :lmao:

Offline tomterp

  • Global Moderator
  • ****
  • Posts: 33869
  • Hell yes!
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 2
« Reply #287: September 13, 2011, 09:41:20 PM »
  He must mean the one who came in and promptly stranded two runners in scoring position last night :lmao:

As Jags just said, he's been our best with inherited runners this year,only 6 of 36 scored.

He's been terrific since Aug 6, only 4 hits   :shock:  and 1 earned run in his last 15 outings. 

Edit, make that 16 outings.    :clap:

Offline hammondsnats

  • Posts: 37394
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 2
« Reply #288: September 13, 2011, 09:42:04 PM »
great job by our pen tonight (except for slaten as usual)

Offline tomterp

  • Global Moderator
  • ****
  • Posts: 33869
  • Hell yes!
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 2
« Reply #289: September 13, 2011, 09:42:45 PM »
Sprtsnyan pwned.

Offline Slateman

  • Posts: 66148
  • THE SUMMONER OF THE REVERSE JINX
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 2
« Reply #290: September 13, 2011, 09:43:18 PM »
Huh, I didn't know Coffey was our best pitcher when it comes to stranding inherited runners.

Overall he's been very good this year. He's had three our four terrible games, but outside of that he's been one of the best out of the pen

Offline tomterp

  • Global Moderator
  • ****
  • Posts: 33869
  • Hell yes!
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 2
« Reply #291: September 13, 2011, 09:43:23 PM »
great job by our pen tonight (except for slaten as usual)

Slaten showing nothing, time after time.  Nice that Davey had him on a short leash.

Offline PANatsFan

  • Posts: 37398
  • dogs in uncensored, nudes in gameday
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 2
« Reply #292: September 13, 2011, 09:43:35 PM »
Huh, I didn't know Coffey was our best pitcher when it comes to stranding inherited runners.

He was a big pick up, har har

Offline welch

  • Posts: 17697
  • The Sweetest Right Handed Swing in 1950s Baseball
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 2
« Reply #293: September 13, 2011, 09:44:09 PM »
Note: according to FP, that last pitch is always "a slide-piece". According to Keith Hernandez, it's "a slider". As a hitter, fielder, or analyst, I'd rather have Hernandez.

FP is peppy, but he gets tiresome.

Offline TylerDC

  • Posts: 5962
  • The Future.
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 2
« Reply #294: September 13, 2011, 09:45:02 PM »
lolumps

Offline sportsfan882

  • Posts: 93631
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 2
« Reply #295: September 13, 2011, 09:45:29 PM »
Not even close to a strike

Offline hammondsnats

  • Posts: 37394
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 2
« Reply #296: September 13, 2011, 09:45:54 PM »
even SF doesn't think that's a strike to werth.  you know it's a ball then.

that's bad.

Offline Ali the Baseball Cat

  • Posts: 17858
  • babble on
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 2
« Reply #297: September 13, 2011, 09:45:57 PM »
Nice sales pitch by Werth, but he clearly knew that was low.

Offline aussienatsfan

  • Posts: 7094
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 2
« Reply #298: September 13, 2011, 09:46:05 PM »
not even close, this ump is a freaking bum

Offline welch

  • Posts: 17697
  • The Sweetest Right Handed Swing in 1950s Baseball
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 2
« Reply #299: September 13, 2011, 09:46:09 PM »
Not even close to a strike

Low. Clearly.