Author Topic: Nationals new 1B discussion  (Read 76213 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline EdStroud

  • Posts: 10139
Re: Nationals new 1B discussion
« Reply #1400 on: January 01, 2011, 05:49:39 pm »
By the way, there is a prank video song that is WAAY more hilarious than the rickroll. It's called the Russian lol song.

The part from 1:25-1:35 makes me pound the table in anguished laughter. Then 1:55 comes and I can't breathe anymore.

Is this the result of bad LSD testing in Russia during the cold war?

Offline MarquisDeSade

  • Posts: 15101
  • Captain Sadness
Re: Nationals new 1B discussion
« Reply #1401 on: January 01, 2011, 06:33:33 pm »
Uh, did LaRoche really have a 1.2 WAR last year?

Offline Lintyfresh85

  • Posts: 35152
  • World Champions!!!
Re: Nationals new 1B discussion
« Reply #1402 on: January 01, 2011, 06:46:42 pm »
Uh, did LaRoche really have a 1.2 WAR last year?

It's all part of the plan.

Offline MarquisDeSade

  • Posts: 15101
  • Captain Sadness
Re: Nationals new 1B discussion
« Reply #1403 on: January 01, 2011, 06:52:20 pm »
It's all part of the plan.

Casey "Assman" Kotchman had a -0.9.  Awesome.

Offline PatsNats28

  • Posts: 8522
Re: Nationals new 1B discussion
« Reply #1404 on: January 01, 2011, 06:52:51 pm »
if you're trying to be unbiased (which I'm not so sure of) then you should probably also note that :clap: and "sanity" = agreeing with PA

I've probably disagreed with PA before (I don't really remember these things), I'm not exactly LANC. I'll be pissed if we don't get LaRoche now.

Offline Obed_Marsh

  • Posts: 7593
Re: Nationals new 1B discussion
« Reply #1405 on: January 01, 2011, 07:19:42 pm »
Wow. Beat out by the O's.  :bag: :doh:

Offline comish4lif

  • Posts: 2936
  • Too Stressed to care.
Re: Nationals new 1B discussion
« Reply #1406 on: January 01, 2011, 07:46:18 pm »
Then who did they want and why didn't they sign him instead of putting themselves in this situation?
That.

As I've said, I just want to see a better team on the field. I want to trust Rizzoners. I'd they wanted Peña over Dunn. Fine, as long as it looks like a plan. Now that Dunn, Peña, Lee ar gone and IF we get Laroche, it will look like we "ended up" with him, as opposed to him being the one that we wanted....

As for whether or not we should have gone an extra million here or there, my fear (unfounded but plausible) is that Rizzo doesn't have a set 2011 budget payroll to work with and every move has to be presented to the board. Point being, if Rizzo has a budget to work with, it's his million or two to spend and if he spends it one one position or player, he doesn't  have that money to spend elsewhere. What I suspect, is that the board is on each decision. Offer Lee $8m? Boards says OK. Rizzo takes offer to Lee, agent counter offers for $10m. Rizzo goes back to the board. And repeat.

Offline Tyler Durden

  • Posts: 7970
  • Leprechaun
Re: Nationals new 1B discussion
« Reply #1407 on: January 01, 2011, 08:43:25 pm »
That.

As I've said, I just want to see a better team on the field. I want to trust Rizzoners. I'd they wanted Peña over Dunn. Fine, as long as it looks like a plan. Now that Dunn, Peña, Lee ar gone and IF we get Laroche, it will look like we "ended up" with him, as opposed to him being the one that we wanted....


I agree with this.  Phase II looks a lot like it involves some bargain basement shopping right now with the 1B situation.  The Werth signing was great.  So was going after Cliff Lee, Greinke, de la Rosa, and whoever else.  But just settling for the last 1B standing looks terrible - and that's important not just for right now but for future free agents who might want to come here.  The Nats just lost out on Greinke because we look like losers. 

If we sign LaRoche and he has a great year, then maybe all this will be forgotten.  But looking like losers already cost us Greinke and who knows who else.  If we don't sign LaRoche or he doens't have a good year, then we may lose out on other guys next offseason.

Offline welch

  • Posts: 18108
  • The Sweetest Right Handed Swing in 1950s Baseball
Re: Nationals new 1B discussion
« Reply #1408 on: January 01, 2011, 09:30:10 pm »
Lerners certainly don't have an economic model similar to the Yankees and many people have speculated that losing can be more profitable than winning.

I read the analysis, at least on the Pirates. It indicates that a team can make a small profit by losing in a small market. Ticket sales roughly equals MLB sharing, but both are small, and static.

Win and you pull more fans, you have a larger local TV/radio contract -- the Yankee magic when they signed an exclusive with MSG -- and you sell merchandise of all sorts. Your brand goes on everything.

No sports team is big business, but consider publicity as a variety of money. Who had heard of Daniel Snyder before he bought the Redskins?

Offline Lintyfresh85

  • Posts: 35152
  • World Champions!!!
Re: Nationals new 1B discussion
« Reply #1409 on: January 01, 2011, 09:34:15 pm »
What a low payroll does promise you though, is that win or lose, your team is going to turn a profit... if you put a big budget team on the field, and you end up like the Mets... you risk a season running into the red.

The Lerner's worst nightmare, of course.

Offline KnorrForYourMoney

  • Posts: 16304
  • pissy DC sports fan
Re: Nationals new 1B discussion
« Reply #1410 on: January 01, 2011, 10:35:55 pm »
The Werth signing was great.  So was going after Cliff Lee, Greinke, de la Rosa, and whoever else.

Sorry, simply "pursuing" the best free agents, as opposed to actually signing them, counts for crap.

Offline Coladar

  • Posts: 2826
Re: Nationals new 1B discussion
« Reply #1411 on: January 02, 2011, 01:54:19 am »
I'd just like to note... You don't read articles like this about the Nats, despite Lee not being a huge deal... http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/os-add-derrek-lee/

Project to score five runs a game, even the remotest shot in simply being discussed at being a contender. I don't think there is any doubt that for 90% of last season, anyone would have said the Os were the worse team, with far more holes than the Nats. Shows you the difference between a productive offseason, and an offseason spouting PR bull****, phase two!!!, and signing one above average player to a ridiculous contract is.

Offline MarquisDeSade

  • Posts: 15101
  • Captain Sadness
Re: Nationals new 1B discussion
« Reply #1412 on: January 02, 2011, 07:58:27 am »
Shows you the difference between a productive offseason, and an offseason spouting PR bull****, phase two!!!, and signing one above average player to a ridiculous contract is.

Here's my favourite line:

That said, the Orioles have significantly improved their offense without making outlandish long-term commitments or surrendering prime prospects.

Offline Evolution33

  • Posts: 5093
    • Blown Save, Win
Re: Nationals new 1B discussion
« Reply #1413 on: January 02, 2011, 09:07:21 am »
I do not buy the Orioles hype for one second. They still have a lot of the same issues that they had last season. The Orioles biggest weakness last season was the bullpen, and it has arguably gotten weaker with the trade of Hernandez and the free agent lose of Hendricks. Derrek Lee has a chance to have a rebound season, but he is still 35 years old and coming off of an injury. Mark Reynolds is a good young player but he simply strikes out too much and you will not hear me say that about a lot of players. But he just doesn't make contact enough. When he hits the ball it goes a long way but good pitchers can easily handle him and there are just as many if not more good pitchers in the AL East than the NL West. Brian Roberts and JJ Hardy combined played 160 games last season. The Orioles had a lot of health issues around the infield. Jones and Markakis are both good young players but at 2.3 WAR and 2.8 WAR they are nothing more than slightly above average. The Orioles have no star level players. They have a lot of young guys that have potential, but potential is not production. That goes double for the pitching staff. Matusz is good and showed a lot of promise last season, but putting another crappy bullpen behind young pitchers is an easy way to hurt their confidence. Maybe running a bunch of league average players, a promising but unproven rotation, and what could be the worst bullpen ever is a way to contend in another division, but the Orioles have to play 4 teams that are better than them 19 times each. The Orioles will end up about as good as last years media darling. 

Online HalfSmokes

  • Posts: 21928
Re: Nationals new 1B discussion
« Reply #1414 on: January 02, 2011, 09:52:52 am »
Here's my favourite line:

That said, the Orioles have significantly improved their offense without making outlandish long-term commitments or surrendering prime prospects.

And when you compare their roster to the rest of their division, you get a last place team


Offline Tyler Durden

  • Posts: 7970
  • Leprechaun
Re: Nationals new 1B discussion
« Reply #1415 on: January 02, 2011, 10:11:40 am »
I'm pretty sure the Orioles will lose 90+ games.  Possibly 100. 

I don't think I'd trade rosters with them. 

I also think fangraphs is ridiculous sometimes.  The goal is to win - not to 'improve without making outlandish long-term commitments or surrendering prime prospects.'  Does that mean fangraphs would be critical of the Nats if we came away this offseason with Werth, Greinke, and a 1B?  Give me a break.

Offline MarquisDeSade

  • Posts: 15101
  • Captain Sadness
Re: Nationals new 1B discussion
« Reply #1416 on: January 02, 2011, 10:14:49 am »
And when you compare their roster to the rest of their division, you get a last place team

The Washington DC-Baltimore Metroplex - where last place is the best you can hope for...

Offline Evolution33

  • Posts: 5093
    • Blown Save, Win
Re: Nationals new 1B discussion
« Reply #1417 on: January 02, 2011, 10:35:37 am »
http://twitter.com/dSoldevila/status/21582969890148352

And the Orioles lose another reliever. Simon accused of killing someone.

Offline houston-nat

  • Posts: 19056
Re: Nationals new 1B discussion
« Reply #1418 on: January 02, 2011, 10:39:36 am »
http://twitter.com/dSoldevila/status/21582969890148352

And the Orioles lose another reliever. Simon accused of killing someone.

Not sure why this is in the Nationals 1B thread, but can you imagine if that happened on the Nats? "Storen and McGeary in textbook store hit-and-run!"

Online blue911

  • Posts: 18599
Re: Nationals new 1B discussion
« Reply #1419 on: January 02, 2011, 10:42:42 am »
http://twitter.com/dSoldevila/status/21582969890148352

And the Orioles lose another reliever. Simon accused of killing someone.

He's innocent. Simon would've missed high and away.

Offline NeedaNewNick

  • Posts: 425
Re: Nationals new 1B discussion
« Reply #1420 on: January 02, 2011, 01:21:47 pm »
The Orioles have made a number of sensible moves, and this could be the year they play 10-15 games better than the Nats, who even with Stan gone, continue to focus on spinning, not winning.

Offline NatsDad14

  • Posts: 5241
Re: Nationals new 1B discussion
« Reply #1421 on: January 02, 2011, 02:05:55 pm »
I do not buy the Orioles hype for one second. They still have a lot of the same issues that they had last season. The Orioles biggest weakness last season was the bullpen, and it has arguably gotten weaker with the trade of Hernandez and the free agent lose of Hendricks. Derrek Lee has a chance to have a rebound season, but he is still 35 years old and coming off of an injury. Mark Reynolds is a good young player but he simply strikes out too much and you will not hear me say that about a lot of players. But he just doesn't make contact enough. When he hits the ball it goes a long way but good pitchers can easily handle him and there are just as many if not more good pitchers in the AL East than the NL West. Brian Roberts and JJ Hardy combined played 160 games last season. The Orioles had a lot of health issues around the infield. Jones and Markakis are both good young players but at 2.3 WAR and 2.8 WAR they are nothing more than slightly above average. The Orioles have no star level players. They have a lot of young guys that have potential, but potential is not production. That goes double for the pitching staff. Matusz is good and showed a lot of promise last season, but putting another crappy bullpen behind young pitchers is an easy way to hurt their confidence. Maybe running a bunch of league average players, a promising but unproven rotation, and what could be the worst bullpen ever is a way to contend in another division, but the Orioles have to play 4 teams that are better than them 19 times each. The Orioles will end up about as good as last years media darling. 
Do you realize how bad the O's were at 1B, SS, and 3B? They were simply horrific at those positions. Any upgrade would be huge for the O's. We are talking about a potential 7-8 win upgrade at those positions. Plus, it looked like Showalter might be turning around that team.

Offline Tyler Durden

  • Posts: 7970
  • Leprechaun
Re: Nationals new 1B discussion
« Reply #1422 on: January 02, 2011, 02:22:32 pm »
Do you realize how bad the O's were at 1B, SS, and 3B? They were simply horrific at those positions. Any upgrade would be huge for the O's. We are talking about a potential 7-8 win upgrade at those positions. Plus, it looked like Showalter might be turning around that team.

The O's need huge upgrades across the board in order to even pass the Blue Jays.  They're not going to be able to do that on the cheap like they have been. 

The hype comes from squeezing out an extra win or two without having to pay market rate for it.  That seems to be some kind of great accomplishment for the fangraphs crowd.  Sorry, but I'd rather overpay for Jayson Werth than underpay for JJ Hardy and Mark Reynolds.

I bet they lose big again in 2011.  90+ and last place.

Online HalfSmokes

  • Posts: 21928
Re: Nationals new 1B discussion
« Reply #1423 on: January 02, 2011, 02:26:12 pm »
This, an inefficient upgrade us better than effecient crap

Offline Lintyfresh85

  • Posts: 35152
  • World Champions!!!
Re: Nationals new 1B discussion
« Reply #1424 on: January 02, 2011, 02:33:09 pm »
O's better than the Nats.

Unfortunately, I don't think its even close.