Author Topic: Nationals new 1B discussion  (Read 76374 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline tomterp

  • Global Moderator
  • ****
  • Posts: 33885
  • Hell yes!
Re: Nationals new 1B discussion
« Reply #325 on: December 08, 2010, 09:53:44 pm »
Gotta keep quoting these for posteriors.

I trie rep;tyng but it's too mcy trouble.  I'm p[aisee because I wsant to etll Ed STrouid hes ring,.

Wrong.

Offline Nathan

  • Posts: 10726
  • Wow. Such warnings. Very baseball. Moderator Doge.
Re: Nationals new 1B discussion
« Reply #326 on: December 08, 2010, 09:54:59 pm »
Gotta keep quoting these for posteriors.
Evil moderators can edit your post later, and no one would ever know...

For instance, I have never in my life thought about posting this:

Chief is the best! :woop:
:P

Offline tomterp

  • Global Moderator
  • ****
  • Posts: 33885
  • Hell yes!
Re: Nationals new 1B discussion
« Reply #327 on: December 08, 2010, 09:56:13 pm »
Evil moderators can edit your post later, and no one would ever know...

For instance, I have never in my life thought about posting this:
:P

 :?

Offline Nathan

  • Posts: 10726
  • Wow. Such warnings. Very baseball. Moderator Doge.

Offline Lintyfresh85

  • Posts: 35152
  • World Champions!!!
Re: Nationals new 1B discussion
« Reply #329 on: December 08, 2010, 11:13:37 pm »
I'm p[aisee because I wsant to etll Ed STrouid hes ring,.

Wrong.

I've read this about six times... and I still don't know what the hell you are saying!

Offline Potomac Cannons

  • Posts: 3279
Re: Nationals new 1B discussion
« Reply #330 on: December 09, 2010, 12:08:17 am »
If that's the case than SF belongs in a padded room.

Ding. Ding. Ding.  We have a winner.

Offline Lintyfresh85

  • Posts: 35152
  • World Champions!!!
Re: Nationals new 1B discussion
« Reply #331 on: December 09, 2010, 12:10:42 am »
Are you going to address Pena's comments?

Offline Lintyfresh85

  • Posts: 35152
  • World Champions!!!
Re: Nationals new 1B discussion
« Reply #332 on: December 09, 2010, 12:35:34 am »
Answer the question.

Offline cmdterps44

  • Posts: 15551
  • Future
Re: Nationals new 1B discussion
« Reply #333 on: December 09, 2010, 02:38:22 am »
Are you going to address Pena's comments?
Answer the question.

Incase he has you on ignore.

Offline Lintyfresh85

  • Posts: 35152
  • World Champions!!!
Re: Nationals new 1B discussion
« Reply #334 on: December 09, 2010, 03:03:14 am »
He doesn't.

Offline Coladar

  • Posts: 2826
Re: Nationals new 1B discussion
« Reply #335 on: December 09, 2010, 04:15:14 am »
He doesn't.

Yep, no one has Linty on ignore per his profile, so that's not the reason.

Offline houston-nat

  • Posts: 19056
Re: Nationals new 1B discussion
« Reply #336 on: December 09, 2010, 04:31:15 am »
Answer the question.

Okay, if you saw him reading the thread and posted this, that would be slightly Ladsonish.

Offline JMW IV

  • Posts: 11345
  • Name on the Front > Name on The Back
Re: Nationals new 1B discussion
« Reply #337 on: December 09, 2010, 08:07:37 am »
what Pena comments?

Offline tomterp

  • Global Moderator
  • ****
  • Posts: 33885
  • Hell yes!
Re: Nationals new 1B discussion
« Reply #338 on: December 09, 2010, 09:53:21 am »
I've read this about six times... and I still don't know what the hell you are saying!

Um, it was "I'm pissed because I want to tell Ed Stroud he's wrong."  It was getting really hard to type.  I don't think that Wild Turkey Rye as a nightcap was helping any.   

Offline Galah

  • Posts: 2859
  • 2016 - the year that everything changed, again.
Re: Nationals new 1B discussion
« Reply #339 on: December 09, 2010, 11:12:38 am »
Um, it was "I'm pissed because I want to tell Ed Stroud he's wrong."  It was getting really hard to type.  I don't think that Wild Turkey Rye as a nightcap was helping any.   

I don't think you could have said it so eloquently without it.

Offline NatsDad14

  • Posts: 5241
Re: Nationals new 1B discussion
« Reply #340 on: December 09, 2010, 04:50:43 pm »
I read that Buster Olney talked to Rizzo and Rizzo said that they weren't close with LaRoche. He said good chance they don't sign LaRoche or Lee at 1B.

Offline blue911

  • Posts: 18599
Re: Nationals new 1B discussion
« Reply #341 on: December 09, 2010, 04:58:56 pm »
I read that Buster Olney talked to Rizzo and Rizzo said that they weren't close with LaRoche. He said good chance they don't sign LaRoche or Lee at 1B.

The Kenny Williams approach

Online JCA-CrystalCity

  • Global Moderator
  • ****
  • Posts: 45881
  • Platoon - not just a movie, a baseball obsession
Re: Nationals new 1B discussion
« Reply #342 on: December 09, 2010, 05:01:29 pm »
The Kenny Williams approach
dump prospects for player you want?

Heck, I'd be up for Willingham and Burnett for Lars Anderson and Josh Reddick.  they still could use another RH bat for a platoon. 

Offline Evolution33

  • Posts: 5093
    • Blown Save, Win
Re: Nationals new 1B discussion
« Reply #343 on: December 09, 2010, 05:03:20 pm »


Offline Nathan

  • Posts: 10726
  • Wow. Such warnings. Very baseball. Moderator Doge.
Re: Nationals new 1B discussion
« Reply #345 on: December 09, 2010, 05:04:56 pm »
:shock:

Offline cmdterps44

  • Posts: 15551
  • Future
Re: Nationals new 1B discussion
« Reply #346 on: December 09, 2010, 05:14:31 pm »
How about we sign LaRoche AND Hawpe. Then we can use Hawpe in the OF with Morse and move Werth to CF.... okay that'd be a terrible idea. I don't want to rely on Morgan.

Offline PANatsFan

  • Posts: 37398
  • dogs in uncensored, nudes in gameday
Re: Nationals new 1B discussion
« Reply #347 on: December 09, 2010, 05:16:14 pm »

Offline Sharp

  • Posts: 3582
Re: Nationals new 1B discussion
« Reply #348 on: December 09, 2010, 05:18:06 pm »

Offline PANatsFan

  • Posts: 37398
  • dogs in uncensored, nudes in gameday
Re: Nationals new 1B discussion
« Reply #349 on: December 09, 2010, 05:18:38 pm »
As a platoon for Morse though.

Ok, good.