Author Topic: The "Former Nat Watch" Thread (2010)  (Read 60924 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Tyler Durden

  • Posts: 7970
  • Leprechaun
Re: The "Former Nat Watch" Thread (2010)
« Reply #975 on: February 04, 2011, 06:59:00 am »
It pretty much turned out to be Burnett for Hanrahan.  Pretty decent trade for both sides - Hanrahan has done OK in Pittsburgh but he needed to move on from DC.  He was Brian Bruney before there ever was a Brian Bruney.

Online JCA-CrystalCity

  • Global Moderator
  • ****
  • Posts: 45634
  • Platoon - not just a movie, a baseball obsession
Re: The "Former Nat Watch" Thread (2010)
« Reply #976 on: February 04, 2011, 08:54:41 am »
Speaking of Bruney, after all the lentils, brown rice, fruit, and vegetables yesterday and high fiber cereal this AM, I was reminded of one the quote of the year nominees.

Offline tomterp

  • Global Moderator
  • ****
  • Posts: 33885
  • Hell yes!
Re: The "Former Nat Watch" Thread (2010)
« Reply #977 on: February 04, 2011, 09:03:28 am »
Speaking of Bruney, after all the lentils, brown rice, fruit, and vegetables yesterday and high fiber cereal this AM, I was reminded of one the quote of the year nominees.

 :smh:

Offline soxfan59

  • Posts: 1208
  • Gough, Gough White Sox!!!
    • John R. Russell, Ltd.
Re: The "Former Nat Watch" Thread (2010)
« Reply #978 on: February 04, 2011, 03:57:26 pm »
Milledge is a White Sox, minor league deal
I figured there'd be more spleen venting about Milledge over here, but perhaps you guys spent all that when you sent him to the Pirates.  The general consensus on the White Sox message boards is that this is a low risk/potential high return deal.  Meh.  Seeing as Milledge has warn out his welcome on three teams before the age of 25, I won't hold my breath.  i don't see him on the roster, minor league or otherwise, after we break camp in the spring.

Offline Lintyfresh85

  • Posts: 35152
  • World Champions!!!
Re: The "Former Nat Watch" Thread (2010)
« Reply #979 on: February 04, 2011, 04:05:36 pm »
Like I said... I was surprised how solid he was against LHP.

Maybe he'll find a role with the Sox.

But, I doubt it.

Offline tomterp

  • Global Moderator
  • ****
  • Posts: 33885
  • Hell yes!
Re: The "Former Nat Watch" Thread (2010)
« Reply #980 on: February 04, 2011, 04:22:18 pm »
 The general consensus on the White Sox message boards is that this is a low risk/potential high return deal.  Meh.  Seeing as Milledge has warn out his welcome on three teams before the age of 25, I won't hold my breath.  

Has enough talent to play better than he has, but is generally lazy with poor baseball instincts.

Offline PANatsFan

  • Posts: 37398
  • dogs in uncensored, nudes in gameday
Re: The "Former Nat Watch" Thread (2010)
« Reply #981 on: February 04, 2011, 04:23:15 pm »
I figured there'd be more spleen venting about Milledge over here, but perhaps you guys spent all that when you sent him to the Pirates.  The general consensus on the White Sox message boards is that this is a low risk/potential high return deal.  Meh.  Seeing as Milledge has warn out his welcome on three teams before the age of 25, I won't hold my breath.  i don't see him on the roster, minor league or otherwise, after we break camp in the spring.

He got pwned by Strasburg and now we are happy.

Online blue911

  • Posts: 18596
Re: The "Former Nat Watch" Thread (2010)
« Reply #982 on: February 04, 2011, 04:24:35 pm »
He got pwned by Strasburg and now we are happy.

he peed his pants,he did.

Offline houston-nat

  • Posts: 19056
Re: The "Former Nat Watch" Thread (2010)
« Reply #983 on: February 04, 2011, 06:44:07 pm »
Yankees get Ron Belliard on a minor league deal.

Offline hammondsnats

  • Posts: 37394
Re: The "Former Nat Watch" Thread (2010)
« Reply #984 on: February 04, 2011, 07:19:44 pm »
Yankees get Ron Belliard on a minor league deal.

:pimp: yeah yanks

Offline soxfan59

  • Posts: 1208
  • Gough, Gough White Sox!!!
    • John R. Russell, Ltd.
Re: The "Former Nat Watch" Thread (2010)
« Reply #985 on: February 04, 2011, 08:28:48 pm »
Has enough talent to play better than he has, but is generally lazy with poor baseball instincts.

Can he play defense?  Can he cover centerfield?

Offline GburgNatsFan

  • Posts: 22349
  • Let's drink a few for Mathguy.
Re: The "Former Nat Watch" Thread (2010)
« Reply #986 on: February 04, 2011, 08:32:04 pm »
No one knows. He has never really tried.
Can he play defense?  Can he cover centerfield?

Offline tomterp

  • Global Moderator
  • ****
  • Posts: 33885
  • Hell yes!
Re: The "Former Nat Watch" Thread (2010)
« Reply #987 on: February 04, 2011, 08:50:04 pm »
Can he play defense?  Can he cover centerfield?

:smh:

Offline soxfan59

  • Posts: 1208
  • Gough, Gough White Sox!!!
    • John R. Russell, Ltd.
Re: The "Former Nat Watch" Thread (2010)
« Reply #988 on: February 04, 2011, 08:54:59 pm »
No one knows. He has never really tried.
As I suspected.  I have buds who think he's a ready candidate to be the 4th outfielder.  Please.  We'll be lucky to get Andruw Jones out of him.

Offline Tyler Durden

  • Posts: 7970
  • Leprechaun
Re: The "Former Nat Watch" Thread (2010)
« Reply #989 on: February 08, 2011, 11:50:18 am »
Andruw Jones will be much better than Milledge next season.  Watching Milledge in the outfield, you almost get the impression that he has some kind of depth perception problem because he can't seem to tell how far or hard a ball has been hit.  I wouldn't trust him at all in CF.  Maybe he'd be OK in LF but he doesn't have the bat for it.

Offline Lintyfresh85

  • Posts: 35152
  • World Champions!!!
Re: The "Former Nat Watch" Thread (2010)
« Reply #990 on: February 08, 2011, 12:01:29 pm »
Andruw Jones will be much better than Milledge next season.  Watching Milledge in the outfield, you almost get the impression that he has some kind of depth perception problem because he can't seem to tell how far or hard a ball has been hit.  I wouldn't trust him at all in CF.  Maybe he'd be OK in LF but he doesn't have the bat for it.

Jones at 25% is still better than most MLB OF'ers.

Offline Vega

  • Posts: 5516
  • Party’s Over
Re: The "Former Nat Watch" Thread (2010)
« Reply #991 on: February 08, 2011, 03:00:03 pm »
Jones at 25% is still better than most MLB 4th OF'ers.
Fixed. Jones is no longer a starting caliber player, however, he is an exceptional bench player.

Offline Lintyfresh85

  • Posts: 35152
  • World Champions!!!
Re: The "Former Nat Watch" Thread (2010)
« Reply #992 on: February 08, 2011, 03:41:43 pm »
Fixed. Jones is no longer a starting caliber player, however, he is an exceptional bench player.

I meant defensively.

Offensively, he can only hit left handers at this point in his career.

Offline NatsDad14

  • Posts: 5241
Re: The "Former Nat Watch" Thread (2010)
« Reply #993 on: February 08, 2011, 10:32:37 pm »
I don't know about that. All the years of eating his way into shape has taken its toll. I don't think he can be successful in the OF with his weight anymore.

Offline Lintyfresh85

  • Posts: 35152
  • World Champions!!!
Re: The "Former Nat Watch" Thread (2010)
« Reply #994 on: February 08, 2011, 10:43:51 pm »
I don't know about that. All the years of eating his way into shape has taken its toll. I don't think he can be successful in the OF with his weight anymore.

Would it surprise you to know that no matter how fat he has gotten, he's still yet to post a negative UZR in his career? That includes 2008 (0.4), 2009 (3.3) and 2010 (0.7).

Offline Tyler Durden

  • Posts: 7970
  • Leprechaun
Re: The "Former Nat Watch" Thread (2010)
« Reply #995 on: February 09, 2011, 08:37:15 am »
I thought Jones would have been a good fit here if we had to stick Morse at 1B. 

Jones might even have been a better fit for this season than Morse in LF for us. 

Offline The Chief

  • Posts: 31838
    • http://www.wnff.net
Re: The "Former Nat Watch" Thread (2010)
« Reply #996 on: February 11, 2011, 12:47:08 am »
Jones fell off the planet after his last big year in Atlanta and has not been heard from since.  Pass.

Offline Coladar

  • Posts: 2826
Re: The "Former Nat Watch" Thread (2010)
« Reply #997 on: February 11, 2011, 03:02:39 am »
Here's a blast from the past quite a few might not even remember. I had to double check he played for the Nats before posting, but I was 99% sure I remembered that name when I saw it on MLB Trade Rumors. Ryan Drese. The last time he pitched in the majors was for the Nats. That should be pretty telling/damning in itself. 2006. He just signed a minor-league deal with the Orioles for 2011. A bizarre signing if ever there was one. Out of the majors for half a decade, was forgettable that half decade ago, and the Orioles have even the remotest of interest in him? Either they're more hard up than I thought for pitching or he's still got something left in the tank. Much as I find the former hard to believe to the extent Drese is possibility, I know theres no way it's the latter.

Offline The Chief

  • Posts: 31838
    • http://www.wnff.net
Re: The "Former Nat Watch" Thread (2010)
« Reply #998 on: February 11, 2011, 03:07:11 am »
Here's a blast from the past quite a few might not even remember. I had to double check he played for the Nats before posting, but I was 99% sure I remembered that name when I saw it on MLB Trade Rumors. Ryan Drese. The last time he pitched in the majors was for the Nats. That should be pretty telling/damning in itself. 2006. He just signed a minor-league deal with the Orioles for 2011. A bizarre signing if ever there was one. Out of the majors for half a decade, was forgettable that half decade ago, and the Orioles have even the remotest of interest in him? Either they're more hard up than I thought for pitching or he's still got something left in the tank. Much as I find the former hard to believe to the extent Drese is possibility, I know theres no way it's the latter.

How could anyone forget Drese?  He pitched 8 innings of shut-out ball against the Angels in the final game of the series in 2005.  Def one of the most memorable Nats games to date.  Heady times, those were.

*looks off into the distance wistfully*

Re: The "Former Nat Watch" Thread (2010)
« Reply #999 on: February 11, 2011, 07:36:37 am »
How could anyone forget Drese?  He pitched 8 innings of shut-out ball against the Angels in the final game of the series in 2005.  Def one of the most memorable Nats games to date.  Heady times, those were.

*looks off into the distance wistfully*

I remember Drese. Big ground ball pitcher if I remember correctly.