Author Topic: Keith Law on Dunn (Read 26459 times)

spidernat · « **Reply #225 on:** February 13, 2009, 12:34:56 am »

Quote from: hammondsnats on February 13, 2009, 12:34:21 am

oh no it's the klaw!

hammonds came up with a clever one.

However this battle was weak. One of the girls could've sent this joker running for cover.

cmdterps44 · « **Reply #226 on:** February 13, 2009, 12:35:44 am »

Quote from: hammondsnats on February 13, 2009, 12:34:21 am

oh no it's the klaw!

that was a good one

MrMadison · « **Reply #227 on:** February 13, 2009, 12:35:47 am »

ok seriously. enough about Keith Law. Let's just all accept that fact that he and his fanboys/groupies on his blog will never like the Nats or anything they do and will generalize the Nats fans as rose-colored glasses wearing morons whenever possible, and move on. We know better, so let's just let them have their ignorant opinions in peace.

Pitchers and Catchers report in 1 day, and then we'll have better things to do than worry about what Keith Law thinks.

I think it's time this thread go the way of the dodo.

cmdterps44 · « **Reply #228 on:** February 13, 2009, 12:38:29 am »

I would agree, but this is the thread of the day. The "hot" topic. We have nothing else to do for a day until pitchers and catchers. We got Dunn now no need for a Plan B or C topic. We have Keith Law though, and this will take us to the next step!

The Chief · « **Reply #229 on:** February 13, 2009, 12:41:14 am »

I'm not going to lock it, but I agree, this has pretty much run it's course.

I don't know how much anyone else actually cares or is bothered, but I can honestly say this is the single most surreal and hilarious thing that has happened on this board in the short few years since I started it.

hammondsnats · « **Reply #230 on:** February 13, 2009, 12:44:10 am »

Quote from: The Chief on February 13, 2009, 12:41:14 am

I'm not going to lock it, but I agree, this has pretty much run it's course.

I don't know how much anyone else actually cares or is bothered, but I can honestly say this is the single most surreal and hilarious thing that has happened on this board in the short few years since I started it.

without a doubt. and in journalism 101 you realize in this business you're going to get feedback (both good or bad). and he acts like a whiny high school newspaper opinion editor in his responses to the nats fan base.

i'm dunn with it.

KnorrForYourMoney · « **Reply #231 on:** February 13, 2009, 12:48:02 am »

Quote from: The Chief on February 13, 2009, 12:41:14 am

I'm not going to lock it, but I agree, this has pretty much run it's course.

I don't know how much anyone else actually cares or is bothered, but I can honestly say this is the single most surreal and hilarious thing that has happened on this board in the short few years since I started it.

I've never seen anything quite like this at any message board.

spidernat · « **Reply #232 on:** February 13, 2009, 12:48:10 am »

Maybe leclair was Keith Law.

This is the only Law I'm concerned with.

MrMadison · « **Reply #233 on:** February 13, 2009, 12:49:06 am »

Quote from: spidernat on February 13, 2009, 12:48:10 am

Maybe leclair was Keith Law.

I was thinking that too.

KnorrForYourMoney · « **Reply #234 on:** February 13, 2009, 12:50:45 am »

Quote from: spidernat on February 13, 2009, 12:48:10 am

Maybe leclair was Keith Law.

This is the only Law I'm concerned with.

Moved to Uncensored in 5...4...3...

MrMadison · « **Reply #235 on:** February 13, 2009, 12:52:06 am »

Quote from: spidernat on February 13, 2009, 12:48:10 am

This is the only Law I'm concerned with.

Yeah...I'd approach that bench.

hammondsnats · « **Reply #236 on:** February 13, 2009, 12:53:13 am »

she'd look good in a line-up with salmon and teixeira

MrMadison · « **Reply #237 on:** February 13, 2009, 12:54:18 am »

Quote from: hammondsnats on February 13, 2009, 12:53:13 am

she'd look good in a line-up with Salma and Halle

fixed.

The Chief · « **Reply #238 on:** February 13, 2009, 12:55:07 am »

Quote from: hammondsnats on February 13, 2009, 12:53:13 am

she'd look good in a line-up with salmon and teixeira

That made me laugh. Hard.

Quote from: MrMadison on February 13, 2009, 12:49:06 am

I was thinking that too.

Even given the events of the evening, I STRONGLY doubt the man has THAT much free time on his hands. And he'd probably laugh at you for even giving the idea any credibility. Just to humor you - leclair's IP traces to somewhere in Pennsylvania, dunno if that means anything to anyone or not.

sportsfan882 · « **Reply #239 on:** February 13, 2009, 12:56:04 am »

spidernat · « **Reply #240 on:** February 13, 2009, 12:56:36 am »

Quote from: hammondsnats on February 13, 2009, 12:53:13 am

she'd look good in a line-up with salmon and teixeira

She'd probably charge me with possession of a concealed weapon.

spidernat · « **Reply #241 on:** February 13, 2009, 12:57:35 am »

Hey is that really Law? If so, isn't he the geek that does some of the fantasy baseball on ESPN or does he just make appearances on First Take?

sportsfan882 · « **Reply #242 on:** February 13, 2009, 12:58:32 am »

Quote from: spidernat on February 13, 2009, 12:57:35 am

Hey is that really Law? If so, isn't he the geek that does some of the fantasy baseball on ESPN or does he just make appearances on First Take?

yes, that's him. yeah I think he makes a few TV appearances from time to time.

spidernat · « **Reply #243 on:** February 13, 2009, 01:00:39 am »

Quote from: sportsfan882 on February 13, 2009, 12:58:32 am

yes, that's him. yeah I think he makes a few TV appearances from time to time.

One thing is for sure, if he didn't hate the Nats before he definitely hates them after today.

cmdterps44 · « **Reply #244 on:** February 13, 2009, 01:04:40 am »

I would definitely forget about the Bonafacio trade for her.

To forced?

Nat of the Living Dead · « **Reply #245 on:** February 13, 2009, 01:56:43 am »

Quote from: sportsfan882 on February 13, 2009, 12:56:04 am

What a geek.

Man, I missed a bunch tonight, didn't I?

DCFan · « **Reply #246 on:** February 13, 2009, 07:55:07 am »

Eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeek! It's Keith Law and he's saying bad things about the Nats and their fans! That meany!

HalfSmokes · « **Reply #247 on:** February 13, 2009, 07:59:04 am »

Quote from: spidernat on February 13, 2009, 12:57:35 am

Hey is that really Law? If so, isn't he the geek that does some of the fantasy baseball on ESPN or does he just make appearances on First Take?

he's not a fantasy guy. If he were, he would know our roster a little better. Some fantasy guys even give our offense some credit. Are you thinking of Matt Berry?

R-Zim#11 · « **Reply #248 on:** February 13, 2009, 08:34:59 am »

Quote from: tomterp on February 12, 2009, 04:57:05 pm

Are you the one that spelled it "Zimmerann"?

Yeah...I'm retarded. I was typing fast with big hands...

R-Zim#11 · « **Reply #249 on:** February 13, 2009, 09:09:38 am »

I just can't help myself:

Hey Klaw, miss me?

Quote

I must have really gotten under your skin to get all this love. I am quite proud of myself.

Ok, so the Salmon line was a joke? How are we supposed to tell when your articles are littered with just plain errors?

Dukes doesn’t hit for power or walk enough? He played 81 games last year: 13 HRs, 16 2B, 50BB. Over a full season that is 26 HRs, 32 doubles, and 100 walks. Care to recant that? I did see you said he wouldn’t walk more then 60 times next year. You’re clearly wrong here.

Zimmerman, despite to getting hurt last year, is still averaging 70 extra-base hits a year, at 24. That’s not hitting for power?

Oh and then you dropped this gem: Felix Pie has “power potential.” In 130 games, he has hit a whopping 3 HRs in his career.

Well, care to defend those gaffes?

I know I should just let this go -- but the awful journalism on ESPN and the like really makes it unbearable for people who actually follow the sport. How often is ESPN even remotely correct? How often do they just make s--t up to get readers/ratings?