Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 8 9 10 11   Go Down

Author Topic: Keith Law on Dunn  (Read 26457 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline ronnynat

  • Posts: 23269
Re: Keith Law on Dunn
« Reply #100 on: February 12, 2009, 02:49:07 pm »
Quote from: R-Zim#11 on February 12, 2009, 02:46:41 pm
Chief was this one yours:

Keith,

Not sure what your deal is -- but thinking that signing Dunn isn't anything but a positive move for the Nats is just dumb -- your articles about the Nats are always the same -- blasting the Nats for everything negative, but never giving them credit for what is positive -- your issues seem personal at this point which is unprofessional and your article is riddled with factual errors which is embarrassing.

It got posted under my account...


That's wpa's style of writing.
Logged

Offline wpa2629

  • Posts: 17048
  • No Trade Clause
Re: Keith Law on Dunn
« Reply #101 on: February 12, 2009, 02:49:53 pm »
That was me ...
Logged

Offline R-Zim#11

  • Posts: 1740
Re: Keith Law on Dunn
« Reply #102 on: February 12, 2009, 02:49:57 pm »
Quote from: spidernat on February 12, 2009, 01:45:54 pm
I keep up with transactions, follow the team closely, discuss it with you guys and my brothers and draw my own conclusions lest I be labeled unoriginal.  :rofl:

I love when I can really leave a mark... ;)
Logged

Offline blue911

  • Posts: 18593
Re: Keith Law on Dunn
« Reply #103 on: February 12, 2009, 02:50:08 pm »
Quote from: Nat of the LivingDead on February 12, 2009, 02:46:05 pm
I don't want those idiots having any of my information.

Damn, wish I'd know that before I signed up  :?
Logged

Offline R-Zim#11

  • Posts: 1740
Re: Keith Law on Dunn
« Reply #104 on: February 12, 2009, 02:51:14 pm »
Quote from: wpa2629 on February 12, 2009, 02:49:53 pm
That was me ...

Want to repost it? He'll ignore it if it's me. I think he really hates me now. I've done my job ;)
Logged

Offline wpa2629

  • Posts: 17048
  • No Trade Clause
Re: Keith Law on Dunn
« Reply #105 on: February 12, 2009, 02:52:54 pm »
Quote from: R-Zim#11 on February 12, 2009, 02:51:14 pm
Want to repost it? He'll ignore it if it's me. I think he really hates me now. I've done my job ;)

No, I posted it earlier, then it got posted again by someone else? You ... ? Weird uh ..?
Logged

Offline The Chief

  • Posts: 31838
    • http://www.wnff.net
Re: Keith Law on Dunn
« Reply #106 on: February 12, 2009, 02:56:43 pm »
Nah I'm with NOTLD, it's not worth me signing up for anything just so I can chime in to tell an idiot he's an idiot when everyone else is already doing it for me.  The man probably has a massive complex of some sort already, no need for me to help feed his neuroses.

If I could actually have his hat to take a dump in, though, I'd do it.  Posting comments on the internet just doesn't have enough claws for me.
Logged

Offline cmdterps44

  • Posts: 15551
  • Future
Re: Keith Law on Dunn
« Reply #107 on: February 12, 2009, 03:05:27 pm »
I just wrote another thing attacking him haha, he pissed me off. Whiny Nats Fans? And hes on a freaking professional website? What a douche, I hope he writes back so i can get into an argument over the internet!!
Logged

Offline R-Zim#11

  • Posts: 1740
Re: Keith Law on Dunn
« Reply #108 on: February 12, 2009, 03:06:08 pm »
Quote from: Nat of the LivingDead on February 12, 2009, 02:46:05 pm
I'd join in burning that worm, but I just can't bring myself to sign up for anything ESPN does. I don't want those idiots having any of my information.

Here's another nugget I love:

Quote
Dan (DC): Did you ever post any thoughts on the Pie/Olson trade? Can Pie hit for LF?

SportsNation Keith Law: (2:52 PM ET ) I won't give up on Pie - I think he just needs an extended opportunity. I like the swing and the power potential, but the approach is a little wobbly. I'm pretty sure he's not a fan of the breaking ball.

Pie had three (3) career homeruns...in 130 games...and he has power potential? And Dukes, Zimmerman and Milledge don't...how utterly pathetic...
Logged

Offline tomterp

  • Global Moderator
  • ****
  • Posts: 33885
  • Hell yes!
Re: Keith Law on Dunn
« Reply #109 on: February 12, 2009, 03:07:30 pm »
Quote from: wpa2629 on February 12, 2009, 02:49:53 pm
That was me ...

I couldn't find that in the chat anywhere.
Logged

Offline wpa2629

  • Posts: 17048
  • No Trade Clause
Re: Keith Law on Dunn
« Reply #110 on: February 12, 2009, 03:13:09 pm »
Quote from: tomterp on February 12, 2009, 03:07:30 pm
I couldn't find that in the chat anywhere.

No, it wasn't in the chat, I posted it in the comments on the article ...
Logged

Offline blue911

  • Posts: 18593
Re: Keith Law on Dunn
« Reply #111 on: February 12, 2009, 03:28:48 pm »
Quote
Whiny Nats Fans?

5 pages on Keith Law
Logged

Offline DCFan

  • Posts: 16722
  • What are you dense?
Re: Keith Law on Dunn
« Reply #112 on: February 12, 2009, 03:30:50 pm »
Quote from: blue911 on February 12, 2009, 03:28:48 pm
5 pages on Keith Law

Proving his point.  :shock:
Logged

Offline blue911

  • Posts: 18593
Re: Keith Law on Dunn
« Reply #113 on: February 12, 2009, 03:31:39 pm »
Logged

Offline R-Zim#11

  • Posts: 1740
Re: Keith Law on Dunn
« Reply #114 on: February 12, 2009, 03:31:41 pm »
Quote from: DCFan on February 12, 2009, 03:30:50 pm
Proving his point.  :shock:

Coming from the biggest whiner out there...
Logged

Offline The Chief

  • Posts: 31838
    • http://www.wnff.net
Re: Keith Law on Dunn
« Reply #115 on: February 12, 2009, 03:34:07 pm »
I don't see anything whiny about taking a supposed professional to task for his blatant unprofessionalism and horrible fact-checking.
Logged

Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 76956
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: Keith Law on Dunn
« Reply #116 on: February 12, 2009, 03:35:29 pm »
Logged

Offline cmdterps44

  • Posts: 15551
  • Future
Re: Keith Law on Dunn
« Reply #117 on: February 12, 2009, 03:36:34 pm »
I wouldn't consider myself whiny on this subject, I am however angry at this douche bag. I know I don't have to read his articles, but when he just keeps bashing us for this many years and doesn't even think of logical research and comparisons, yet he still succeeds, is just pathetic.
Logged

Offline wpa2629

  • Posts: 17048
  • No Trade Clause
Re: Keith Law on Dunn
« Reply #118 on: February 12, 2009, 03:37:35 pm »
Quote from: The Chief on February 12, 2009, 03:34:07 pm
I don't see anything whiny about taking a supposed professional to task for his blatant unprofessionalism and horrible fact-checking.

AMEN
Logged

Offline R-Zim#11

  • Posts: 1740
Re: Keith Law on Dunn
« Reply #119 on: February 12, 2009, 03:39:24 pm »
Quote from: The Chief on February 12, 2009, 03:34:07 pm
I don't see anything whiny about taking a supposed professional to task for his blatant unprofessionalism and horrible fact-checking.

The half-assed journalism is getting worse and worse at ESPN. He took several more swipes at me throughout his chat (which I am rather proud of -- I shall have to annoy him more!)
Logged

Offline blue911

  • Posts: 18593
Re: Keith Law on Dunn
« Reply #120 on: February 12, 2009, 03:39:57 pm »
Quote from: cmdterps44 on February 12, 2009, 03:36:34 pm
I wouldn't consider myself whiny on this subject, I am however angry at this douche bag. I know I don't have to read his articles, but when he just keeps bashing us for this many years and doesn't even think of logical research and comparisons, yet he still succeeds, is just pathetic.

He isn't bashing "us". He is bashing the ownership and management of the team.
Logged

Offline R-Zim#11

  • Posts: 1740
Re: Keith Law on Dunn
« Reply #121 on: February 12, 2009, 03:41:11 pm »
Quote from: blue911 on February 12, 2009, 03:39:57 pm
He isn't bashing "us". He is bashing the ownership and management of the team.

No, he clearly calls Nats fans whiney for taking him to task for his shoddy and unprofessional journalism...
Logged

Offline Nat of the Living Dead

  • Posts: 16790
Re: Keith Law on Dunn
« Reply #122 on: February 12, 2009, 03:42:07 pm »
Quote from: The Chief on February 12, 2009, 03:34:07 pm
I don't see anything whiny about taking a supposed professional to task for his blatant unprofessionalism and horrible fact-checking.

Definitely. Blatant mistakes were made with no moves to correct them. It wasn't until some fans stepped in and reamed him on it did he even post an editor's fix.

Nothing wrong with that and certainly nothing wrong with defending your team of choice. 
Logged

Offline R-Zim#11

  • Posts: 1740
Re: Keith Law on Dunn
« Reply #123 on: February 12, 2009, 03:44:07 pm »
Quote from: Nat of the LivingDead on February 12, 2009, 03:42:07 pm
Definitely. Blatant mistakes were made with no moves to correct them. It wasn't until some fans stepped in and reamed him on it did he even post an editor's fix.

Nothing wrong with that and certainly nothing wrong with defending your team of choice. 

The line that got me in his chat was Felix Pie having power potential -- while Dukes Milledge and Zimmerman don't hit for enough power...
Logged

Offline cmdterps44

  • Posts: 15551
  • Future
Re: Keith Law on Dunn
« Reply #124 on: February 12, 2009, 03:46:35 pm »
Quote from: blue911 on February 12, 2009, 03:39:57 pm
He isn't bashing "us". He is bashing the ownership and management of the team.

"Whiny Nats Fans" isnt bashing us? He made that comment in his own comment section in his article because fans were defending.
Logged
Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 8 9 10 11   Go Up