Author Topic: Tex and the Nats...  (Read 168875 times)

0 Members and 6 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline tomterp

  • Global Moderator
  • ****
  • Posts: 33885
  • Hell yes!
Re: Tex and the Nats...
« Reply #3200 on: December 21, 2008, 03:26:39 pm »
This morning on XM it was said that family members of Tex were saying that geography was going to be an important factor, more than $.

Offline PANatsFan

  • Posts: 37398
  • dogs in uncensored, nudes in gameday
Re: Tex and the Nats...
« Reply #3201 on: December 21, 2008, 03:27:58 pm »
Buster Olney talked to somebody in the Nationals organization who said we "absolutely" do not expect to win the Teixeira bidding.

If Olney told me to turn right, I'd give him the finger and turn left.

Offline PANatsFan

  • Posts: 37398
  • dogs in uncensored, nudes in gameday
Re: Tex and the Nats...
« Reply #3202 on: December 21, 2008, 03:32:22 pm »
P.S. I will no longer refer to these goofs by ridiculous nicknames - Buster Olney will be Robert. Skip Bayliss is John Bayliss.

Offline cmdterps44

  • Posts: 15551
  • Future
Re: Tex and the Nats...
« Reply #3203 on: December 21, 2008, 03:41:17 pm »
people are saying its down to the Sox and Os, just because "toolbag" Buster said he talked to someone that talked to someone that doesn't think they're going to win. Somehow that = the nats out of the running?

Im still on the boat that we have the highest bid and Boras is stalling as long as he can.

Offline sportsfan882

  • Posts: 93631
Re: Tex and the Nats...
« Reply #3204 on: December 21, 2008, 03:44:18 pm »
Highest bid doesn't mean crap. He'll take less money to go elsewhere.

Offline tomterp

  • Global Moderator
  • ****
  • Posts: 33885
  • Hell yes!
Re: Tex and the Nats...
« Reply #3205 on: December 21, 2008, 03:48:29 pm »
Highest bid doesn't mean crap. He'll take less money to go elsewhere.

How does that get him close to home, unless you refer to the Orioles?

Offline sportsfan882

  • Posts: 93631
Re: Tex and the Nats...
« Reply #3206 on: December 21, 2008, 03:50:09 pm »
How does that get him close to home, unless you refer to the Orioles?
Could be the O's but more likely it will be Boston. Heck, Anaheim has a better chance than us even though they are at west.

Offline cmdterps44

  • Posts: 15551
  • Future
Re: Tex and the Nats...
« Reply #3207 on: December 21, 2008, 03:50:49 pm »
Highest bid doesn't mean crap. He'll take less money to go elsewhere.

:rofl: or it means that we are offering the most. Sure he can take less but hes gonna get alot of crap for it.

Offline sportsfan882

  • Posts: 93631
Re: Tex and the Nats...
« Reply #3208 on: December 21, 2008, 03:52:13 pm »
:rofl: or it means that we are offering the most. Sure he can take less but hes gonna get alot of crap for it.

So be it. You think he cares about that? He's getting paid a massive amount of money either way. He's going to go where he feels most comfortable.

Offline ronnynat

  • Posts: 23269
Re: Tex and the Nats...
« Reply #3209 on: December 21, 2008, 03:53:01 pm »
:rofl: or it means that we are offering the most. Sure he can take less but hes gonna get alot of crap for it.

No matter where he goes, no one is going to give him crap over the money. He'll be making a ton of it, regardless.


Offline cmdterps44

  • Posts: 15551
  • Future
Re: Tex and the Nats...
« Reply #3210 on: December 21, 2008, 03:54:09 pm »
Not unless its a big difference in the offers, all im saying about it.

Offline ronnynat

  • Posts: 23269
Re: Tex and the Nats...
« Reply #3211 on: December 21, 2008, 03:56:27 pm »
Not unless its a big difference in the offers, all im saying about it.

Would you rather play for the Red Sox at $20 million per year or the Nationals for $23 mil? I'd go with the team that didn't just sign Daniel Cabrera. :lol:

Offline sportsfan882

  • Posts: 93631
Re: Tex and the Nats...
« Reply #3212 on: December 21, 2008, 03:57:17 pm »
Would you rather play for the Red Sox at $20 million per year or the Nationals for $23 mil? I'd go with the team that didn't just sign Daniel Cabrera. :lol:
QFT

Offline UMDNats

  • Posts: 18070
Re: Tex and the Nats...
« Reply #3213 on: December 21, 2008, 04:00:21 pm »
this whole sweepstakes is annoying as hell, why couldn't we just be cheap as hell and not even get involved

MrMadison

  • Guest
Re: Tex and the Nats...
« Reply #3214 on: December 21, 2008, 04:01:41 pm »
this whole sweepstakes is annoying as hell, why couldn't we just be cheap as hell and not even get involved

because the same people who saying "there's no chance in hell he comes here and you're stupid for thinking about it" are the same ones who would be nagging at the Lerners for being cheap if they didn't even bother.

Offline wpa2629

  • Posts: 17048
  • No Trade Clause
Re: Tex and the Nats...
« Reply #3215 on: December 21, 2008, 04:03:21 pm »
buster olney has proven over and over again that he is not an insider, not informed, not smart -- he continues to spout crap and look stupid, over and over and over -  I'm convinced he's legit retarded

Offline ronnynat

  • Posts: 23269
Re: Tex and the Nats...
« Reply #3216 on: December 21, 2008, 04:04:19 pm »
this whole sweepstakes is annoying as hell, why couldn't we just be cheap as hell and not even get involved

I do think we had a chance at one point. I wonder if JimBo and Boras get along.

Offline blue911

  • Posts: 18604
Re: Tex and the Nats...
« Reply #3217 on: December 21, 2008, 04:23:47 pm »
I do think we had a chance at one point. I wonder if JimBo and Boras get along.

I don't think Boras is dealing with Bowden. When you're talking about hundreds of millions, it's usually the owner that negotiates.

Offline UMDNats

  • Posts: 18070
Re: Tex and the Nats...
« Reply #3218 on: December 21, 2008, 04:49:40 pm »
because the same people who saying "there's no chance in hell he comes here and you're stupid for thinking about it" are the same ones who would be nagging at the Lerners for being cheap if they didn't even bother.

i was kidding,  but seriously, this is pissing me off

Offline xposbrad

  • Posts: 364
Re: Tex and the Nats...
« Reply #3219 on: December 21, 2008, 05:46:34 pm »
Would you rather play for the Red Sox at $20 million per year or the Nationals for $23 mil? I'd go with the team that didn't just sign Daniel Cabrera. :lol:

LOL!!!
Although that's so true, there's a price point in which he would come here. Like if it's 1-1.5m more we're only offering, I can see him signing with Boston or LA. But if we are offering him 3m more per year, that's 24m more, which I can't see them leaving on the table.

Offline Obed_Marsh

  • Posts: 7593
Re: Tex and the Nats...
« Reply #3220 on: December 21, 2008, 05:51:21 pm »
Would you rather play for the Red Sox at $20 million per year or the Nationals for $23 mil? I'd go with the team that didn't just sign Daniel Cabrera. :lol:

If I was making that much money it would be whichever geography was best for family and friends. Maybe I decide to go for the winner if the compromise isn't too great but money can't buy me love.


Offline PANatsFan

  • Posts: 37398
  • dogs in uncensored, nudes in gameday
Re: Tex and the Nats...
« Reply #3221 on: December 21, 2008, 05:53:07 pm »
Remember that I picked the Skins to go 8-8.

I now predict that we lose out on Dunn and Tex after making a token effort, we field Willingham at first, and Kearns, Dukes, and Milledge in the OF, and that we lose 90+ games. This is ridiculous already. If you are ponying up 180 million, take it to 200 million and get it done, or shut up.

Offline Air Zimmerman

  • Posts: 7179
  • best 3b in the business
Re: Tex and the Nats...
« Reply #3222 on: December 21, 2008, 05:53:36 pm »
Would you rather play for the Red Sox at $20 million per year or the Nationals for $23 mil? I'd go with the team that didn't just sign Daniel Cabrera. :lol:

there's nothing wrong with signing Cabrera.

Offline DCFan

  • Posts: 16722
  • What are you dense?
Re: Tex and the Nats...
« Reply #3223 on: December 21, 2008, 05:55:45 pm »
This morning on XM it was said that family members of Tex were saying that geography was going to be an important factor, more than $.
People in the media and in the rumor mills keep talking about this attraction to the east coast and a magnetic pull to their respective mommys and daddys in Severna Park and Atlanta but Tex and his Mrs. live in Texas during the offseason.  And with the kinda money he's going to be pulling in, living in a state that doesn't have a state income tax (like Texas) is quite a draw and when either of them needs some parent bonding time, charter a private jet.  ;)

Heck, if geography was such a concern with them and with his wife being from Atlanta, you'd think the Braves would've been the perfect team to sign a long-term, home-town-discount deal with when he was there.  But it was the allure of getting more money than the Braves were offering with nary a mention of geography.  Now that he's on a west coast team (or just came from one) it's the east coast thing suddenly being a hot button concern.  I'm confused or maybe this all makes sense to Boras.  :rofl:

Offline Obed_Marsh

  • Posts: 7593
Re: Tex and the Nats...
« Reply #3224 on: December 21, 2008, 05:58:50 pm »
Heck, if geography was such a concern with them and with his wife being from Atlanta, you'd think the Braves would've been the perfect team to sign a long-term, home-town-discount deal with when he was there.  But it was the allure of getting more money than the Braves were offering with nary a mention of geography.  Now that he's on a west coast team (or just came from one) it's the east coast thing suddenly being a hot button concern.  I'm confused or maybe this all makes sense to Boras.  :rofl:

Unless something changed between now and then. You think you know somebody but man you never do.