Author Topic: Fire Matt Williams! (2015) - Standard Decision.  (Read 159712 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline PC

  • Posts: 47236
Re: Fire Matt Williams! (2015) - Standard Decision.
« Reply #2225 on: September 27, 2015, 11:56:38 am »
I'll be generous and call the Svrluga column "poor written".  He weaves in an out of comments without making it clear how many players he's quoting.  Also if this is the consensus opinion on the team, he spoke to a number of players.  He never discloses how many players he spoke with.  That would have been a good thing to have, the number, even if he didn't quote all of them.

Online Slateman

  • Posts: 66801
  • THE SUMMONER OF THE REVERSE JINX
Re: Fire Matt Williams! (2015) - Standard Decision.
« Reply #2226 on: September 27, 2015, 11:58:06 am »
What a hit job by Svrulga. I'm not a supporter of Williams but a balanced piece would have mentioned that some players support Williams (Harper has gone on record as doing so) and these are the same guys didn't get it done in for another manager in 2013. And, just maybe, he could have mentioned that some of the players need to own up to their own failures.

And regarding giving the proper send off to JZimm and Desmond, a nice ovation when they're introduced for their final home game is all that's needed. These are not guys who are retiring after a long and distinguished career with the team. They've had a nice run and should be appreciated but let's not make them out to be Cal Ripken or Derek Jeter.

What if it's possible that no players support Williams beyond his billet of manager?

Offline PowerBoater69

  • Posts: 14327
    • Twitter
Re: Fire Matt Williams! (2015) - Standard Decision.
« Reply #2227 on: September 27, 2015, 12:06:40 pm »
What if it's possible that no players support Williams beyond his billet of manager?

So the guys celebrating with him are the same rats who stabbed him in the back. Fire Williams, fire Rizzo, blow up the team, get these losers out.

Offline BrandonK

  • Posts: 8183
  • #LOLNats
Re: Fire Matt Williams! (2015) - Standard Decision.
« Reply #2228 on: September 27, 2015, 12:31:47 pm »

Offline mitlen

  • Posts: 66171
  • We had 'em all the way.
Re: Fire Matt Williams! (2015) - Standard Decision.
« Reply #2229 on: September 27, 2015, 12:52:51 pm »
So the guys celebrating with him are the same rats who stabbed him in the back.

That's bitness and/or politics.

Offline DPMOmaha

  • Posts: 22885
Re: Fire Matt Williams! (2015) - Standard Decision.
« Reply #2230 on: September 27, 2015, 02:33:28 pm »
I'll be generous and call the Svrluga column "poor written".  He weaves in an out of comments without making it clear how many players he's quoting.  Also if this is the consensus opinion on the team, he spoke to a number of players.  He never discloses how many players he spoke with.  That would have been a good thing to have, the number, even if he didn't quote all of them.
What would that have added? He covered it fine for me when he said
Quote
And this isn’t just one or two malcontents. These opinions span positions and experience. “It’s a terrible environment,” one player said. “And the amazing part is everybody feels that way.”

Offline Baseball is Life

  • Posts: 20393
  • Proud member of the Sunshine Squad.
Re: Fire Matt Williams! (2015) - Standard Decision.
« Reply #2231 on: September 27, 2015, 03:29:47 pm »
What if it's possible that no players support Williams beyond his billet of manager?

I suppose it's possible but not probable. But you still have to address the issue if you're writing a balanced piece. You know, "Some players still suporrt him" or "only Harper supports him..."

Ask any losing team what they think of their manager and there are going to be some who the stab manager in the back. It goes with the territory. You could probably get a sizable number on a winning team to do it too I bet.

Offline Baseball is Life

  • Posts: 20393
  • Proud member of the Sunshine Squad.
Re: Fire Matt Williams! (2015) - Standard Decision.
« Reply #2232 on: September 27, 2015, 03:31:55 pm »
What would that have added?

He could have mentioned that the superstar on the team has gone on record as supporting him. Or he could have mentioned that not a single player supported him, which he would have done if it was true. Either way, mention if it is unanimous or not. I kinda think that's important.

Offline Optics

  • Posts: 9233
Re: Fire Matt Williams! (2015) - Standard Decision.
« Reply #2233 on: September 27, 2015, 04:35:42 pm »
Matt has lost the clubhouse. He gots to go.

All the other stuff you can kinda sorta excuse or look past, but once a Manager/Coach loses control of his players, he's done.

Offline houston-nat

  • Posts: 19056
Re: Fire Matt Williams! (2015) - Standard Decision.
« Reply #2234 on: September 27, 2015, 04:44:36 pm »
Time to start thinking about the worst managers in MLB history.

Offline PC

  • Posts: 47236
Re: Fire Matt Williams! (2015) - Standard Decision.
« Reply #2235 on: September 27, 2015, 04:46:08 pm »
Time to start thinking about the worst managers in MLB history.

Williams isn't the one who traded for Papelbon.

Offline rileyn

  • Posts: 4251
Re: Fire Matt Williams! (2015) - Standard Decision.
« Reply #2236 on: September 27, 2015, 04:56:20 pm »
LOL at Williams giving all of us the middle finger by sending Papledouche back out for the 9th.  He knows he is gone so he is going to stick it to us all.

Offline Cinqo de Mayo

  • Posts: 432
Re: Fire Matt Williams! (2015) - Standard Decision.
« Reply #2237 on: September 27, 2015, 05:05:08 pm »
Can the Nats finish with a winning record, and does it matter?

Online Slateman

  • Posts: 66801
  • THE SUMMONER OF THE REVERSE JINX
Re: Fire Matt Williams! (2015) - Standard Decision.
« Reply #2238 on: September 27, 2015, 05:20:58 pm »
I suppose it's possible but not probable. But you still have to address the issue if you're writing a balanced piece. You know, "Some players still suporrt him" or "only Harper supports him..."

Ask any losing team what they think of their manager and there are going to be some who the stab manager in the back. It goes with the territory. You could probably get a sizable number on a winning team to do it too I bet.

I think players publically support him because of his billet as manager. But they do not support Matt Williams for manager next season.

It's pretty obvious that this team never got their heads right.

Online Slateman

  • Posts: 66801
  • THE SUMMONER OF THE REVERSE JINX
Re: Fire Matt Williams! (2015) - Standard Decision.
« Reply #2239 on: September 27, 2015, 05:21:49 pm »
Williams isn't the one who traded for Papelbon.

He is the one who couldn't keep Storen's head straight. Papelbon is a good closer. And jerk but a good closer.

Offline Cinqo de Mayo

  • Posts: 432
Re: Fire Matt Williams! (2015) - Standard Decision.
« Reply #2240 on: September 27, 2015, 05:22:53 pm »
He is the one who couldn't keep Storen's head straight. Papelbon is a good closer. And jerk but a good closer.
And yet, Storen will finish with more saves this season.

Offline axman

  • Posts: 57
Re: Fire Matt Williams! (2015) - Standard Decision.
« Reply #2241 on: September 27, 2015, 05:27:42 pm »
Matt has lost the clubhouse. He gots to go.

All the other stuff you can kinda sorta excuse or look past, but once a Manager/Coach loses control of his players, he's done.

Matt has made his mistakes, but he's not responsible for the composition of the team.  Matt managed the team to a winning record in the first half of the season despite the injuries and a depleted bullpen.  Rizzo traded away team chemistry (Clipp) and brought in a cancer (Pap), while doing nothing to address the team's real problem (middle relief.)  Rizzo did the same thing after 2012 (Soriano.)  This was always Mike's team, not Matt's.

If anyone goes it needs to be Rizzo. I realize there's a fire Rizzo thread, but it's relevant to the Williams discussion.  I wouldn't be at all surprised to learn that many of Matt's decisions were influenced by Rizzo; for example, the only explanation for Ian playing practically every game and Danny getting little playing time despite his rebound this year is because Rizzo wanted to increase trade value or potential FA compensation draft pick.

Offline Mattionals

  • Posts: 5911
Re: Fire Matt Williams! (2015) - Standard Decision.
« Reply #2242 on: September 27, 2015, 05:32:42 pm »
Quote
Williams, on why he let Papelbon pitch the ninth, given he put his hands on Harper's throat: "He's our closer."

Offline Natsinpwc

  • Posts: 28007
Re: Fire Matt Williams! (2015) - Standard Decision.
« Reply #2243 on: September 27, 2015, 05:39:06 pm »

Give Matt some credit. He sticks with his standard answers.

Offline Baseball is Life

  • Posts: 20393
  • Proud member of the Sunshine Squad.
Re: Fire Matt Williams! (2015) - Standard Decision.
« Reply #2244 on: September 27, 2015, 05:48:35 pm »
The fight today sealed his fate. He's done.

Offline whytev

  • Posts: 8768
Re: Fire Matt Williams! (2015) - Standard Decision.
« Reply #2245 on: September 27, 2015, 06:14:53 pm »
Could Randy Knorr stay on as the manager if the rest of the assistant coaches were cleaned out?

Could and should.

Offline comish4lif

  • Posts: 2936
  • Too Stressed to care.
Re: Fire Matt Williams! (2015) - Standard Decision.
« Reply #2246 on: September 27, 2015, 07:26:04 pm »
LOL at Williams giving all of us the middle finger by sending Papledouche back out for the 9th.  He knows he is gone so he is going to stick it to us all.
I see that as giving Paps the middle finger..

Offline RobDibblesGhost

  • Posts: 32217
Re: Fire Matt Williams! (2015) - Standard Decision.
« Reply #2247 on: September 27, 2015, 07:31:38 pm »
So he defends sending Papelbon out, but why would you take your best bat out in a tie game?

Offline whytev

  • Posts: 8768
Re: Fire Matt Williams! (2015) - Standard Decision.
« Reply #2248 on: September 27, 2015, 07:32:31 pm »
I see that as giving Paps the middle finger..

I wish he had left him out there indefinitely.

Offline Natsinpwc

  • Posts: 28007
Re: Fire Matt Williams! (2015) - Standard Decision.
« Reply #2249 on: September 27, 2015, 07:34:04 pm »
So he defends sending Papelbon out, but why would you take your best bat out in a tie game?
He didn't take Harper out apparently.