Author Topic: Fire Matt Williams! (2015) - Standard Decision.  (Read 159813 times)

0 Members and 4 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline imref

  • Posts: 47617
  • NG Nattitude?
Re: Fire Matt Williams! (2015) - Standard Decision.
« Reply #2175 on: September 24, 2015, 01:59:54 pm »
I'd say it's more fear of having Scherzer go nuclear on him on the mound in front of the whole ballpark, fanbase, and media.

and a complete and total lack of trust in the bullpen.

Offline welch

  • Posts: 18092
  • The Sweetest Right Handed Swing in 1950s Baseball
Re: Fire Matt Williams! (2015) - Standard Decision.
« Reply #2176 on: September 24, 2015, 07:06:21 pm »
If Williams cannot pull Scherzer even though Scherzer is struggling and has thrown more than 110 or 120 pitches, then Williams is finished. Hire Rancona, for instance. Made Adam Dunn the bench coach, since Dunn is the only guy close to Hondo-sized. Let Dunn pull the pitcher, and if Scherzer objects, Dunn can carry Scherzer back to the club house.

Enough!!!

Offline mitlen

  • Posts: 66171
  • We had 'em all the way.
Re: Fire Matt Williams! (2015) - Standard Decision.
« Reply #2177 on: September 24, 2015, 07:07:36 pm »
for instance. Made Adam Dunn the bench coach, since Dunn is the only guy close to Hondo-sized. Let Dunn pull the pitcher, and if Scherzer objects, Dunn can carry Scherzer back to the club house.

 :spit:

Offline pazzo83

  • Posts: 5348
Re: Fire Matt Williams! (2015) - Standard Decision.
« Reply #2178 on: September 24, 2015, 07:12:06 pm »
Just in for my daily "fire this loser" post.

Offline Mr Clean

  • Posts: 4109
Re: Fire Matt Williams! (2015) - Standard Decision.
« Reply #2179 on: September 24, 2015, 07:46:45 pm »
From Rosenthal re Williams, uh oh: https://twitter.com/Ken_Rosenthal/status/647194053331820545


Definitely notice the lack of energy, something is going on we don't know about yet.

Offline RobDibblesGhost

  • Posts: 32224
Re: Fire Matt Williams! (2015) - Standard Decision.
« Reply #2180 on: September 24, 2015, 07:52:10 pm »
From Rosenthal re Williams, uh oh: https://twitter.com/Ken_Rosenthal/status/647194053331820545


Definitely notice the lack of energy, something is going on we don't know about yet.

Phil Wood said last night on his radio call-in show that all this "no energy" talk is bullcrap  :hammer:

Online rileyn

  • Posts: 4251
Re: Fire Matt Williams! (2015) - Standard Decision.
« Reply #2181 on: September 24, 2015, 07:54:10 pm »
No energy surrounding the team.  Period.  MW deflated the franchise with his managerial gaffes last October, and Desmond and Storen finished the job this season.

Offline mitlen

  • Posts: 66171
  • We had 'em all the way.
Re: Fire Matt Williams! (2015) - Standard Decision.
« Reply #2182 on: September 24, 2015, 07:54:28 pm »
Phil Wood said last night on his radio call-in show that all this "no energy" talk is bullcrap  :hammer:

Wood is the drum major of bullcrap.

Offline Mr Clean

  • Posts: 4109
Re: Fire Matt Williams! (2015) - Standard Decision.
« Reply #2183 on: September 24, 2015, 07:55:06 pm »
Phil Wood said last night on his radio call-in show that all this "no energy" talk is bullcrap  :hammer:

Not surprising. Still thinks Desmond is great.

Of course I guess he believes pro scouts don't know their job.

Online Natsinpwc

  • Posts: 28007
Re: Fire Matt Williams! (2015) - Standard Decision.
« Reply #2184 on: September 24, 2015, 07:58:33 pm »
Wood is the drum major of bullcrap.
After the Tuesday night massacre debacle against the Mets a couple weeks ago listened to him on the way home and he said there are no mental of pressure issues with Storen; it's just mechanics.  Right.  His mechanics only go bad in high pressure situations.  He is an apologist for the team.  Come to think of it most of the media here has been easy on the team.  Too busy getting ready for the Skins.

Offline stoneghost28

  • Posts: 133
Re: Fire Matt Williams! (2015) - Standard Decision.
« Reply #2185 on: September 24, 2015, 08:00:04 pm »
If Williams is going to gripe about Harper's bunt attempts, how about making a stink about all the hitters' at bats because everybody looks like they're completely winging it.  There's no rhyme or reason or plan for any of them.

Why the hell would any moron have Harper Bunt anyway. This isn't the 1920's, there should actually be some science behind these decisions, not brick headed stupidity, and stubbornness guiding them.

Offline Mr Clean

  • Posts: 4109
Re: Fire Matt Williams! (2015) - Standard Decision.
« Reply #2186 on: September 24, 2015, 08:09:11 pm »
Why the hell would any moron have Harper Bunt anyway. This isn't the 1920's, there should actually be some science behind these decisions, not brick headed stupidity, and stubbornness guiding them.
An even larger point: No one on this team seems to know HOW to bunt.

Offline GburgNatsFan

  • Posts: 22349
  • Let's drink a few for Mathguy.
Re: Fire Matt Williams! (2015) - Standard Decision.
« Reply #2187 on: September 24, 2015, 08:14:10 pm »
He also said the night before that the team looked bleh. Which means low energy. :shrug:

Was he snapping at a caller, contradicting them? He'll often go back on a theme he's developing if someone calls in all emotionally charged.

Phil Wood said last night on his radio call-in show that all this "no energy" talk is bullcrap  :hammer:

Offline BrandonK

  • Posts: 8183
  • #LOLNats
Re: Fire Matt Williams! (2015) - Standard Decision.
« Reply #2188 on: September 25, 2015, 09:49:17 am »
Daily "is he gone yet?" post

Offline Baseball is Life

  • Posts: 20393
  • Proud member of the Sunshine Squad.
Re: Fire Matt Williams! (2015) - Standard Decision.
« Reply #2189 on: September 25, 2015, 09:54:03 am »
Is there some stat that measures "low energy" or "lack of urgency"?

In a sport that worships numbers, I find it strange that those subjective and vague concepts get thrown around all the time.

Offline dracnal

  • Posts: 1703
Re: Fire Matt Williams! (2015) - Standard Decision.
« Reply #2190 on: September 25, 2015, 09:58:36 am »
Is there some stat that measures "low energy" or "lack of urgency"?

In a sport that worships numbers, I find it strange that those subjective and vague concepts get thrown around all the time.

Not sure what units quantify it, but when you're predicted to have a historically great rotation/team and the question people are asking themselves by midseason isn't 'How far above 100 games will they finish?' but rather 'Will they finish above .500?' you probably need to be asking some questions like which executives urgently need to use the restroom when they contemplate their future and faced with a choice between ass cancer and MW, which would feel is more urgent to get rid of.

Offline Five Banners

  • Posts: 2406
Re: Fire Matt Williams! (2015) - Standard Decision.
« Reply #2191 on: September 25, 2015, 10:38:29 am »
An even larger point: No one on this team seems to know HOW to bunt.

What, fundamentals and team preparation basics are less than outstanding? We've seen the fruit of that in Landover for years, which the current regime is continuing. This is why it would be nice to see someone else at the helm who executes that more successfully.

For the cost/benefit guys in ownership and management, there is the cost of eating one contract year for a manager versus the potential cost of leaving the current situation and its lack of success in executing fundamentals and being prepared to affect the organization for another full year.  It would be nice to see the latter prioritized; we will see.

Offline tomterp

  • Global Moderator
  • ****
  • Posts: 33885
  • Hell yes!
Re: Fire Matt Williams! (2015) - Standard Decision.
« Reply #2192 on: September 25, 2015, 10:58:50 am »

Valid point.     I retract fat cow.

She's a fat freaking cow.

 :lol:

Do you secretly find her attractive Ray?

Offline tomterp

  • Global Moderator
  • ****
  • Posts: 33885
  • Hell yes!
Re: Fire Matt Williams! (2015) - Standard Decision.
« Reply #2193 on: September 25, 2015, 11:20:29 am »
An even larger point: No one on this team seems to know HOW to bunt.

Two things happening - one, bunting as directed by Matt is very poor strategy that, if successful, would result in FEWER runs being scored.  Better to have a runner on 1st with no outs than one on 2nd with 1 out.

But as you observe, being incapable of executing a flawed strategy well is yet another failure.

Offline GburgNatsFan

  • Posts: 22349
  • Let's drink a few for Mathguy.
Re: Fire Matt Williams! (2015) - Standard Decision.
« Reply #2194 on: September 25, 2015, 02:29:30 pm »
So, you're into her? Is that what you're saying? Because that's what we're reading...


Valid point.     I retract fat cow.

She's a fat freaking cow.

Offline pazzo83

  • Posts: 5348
Re: Fire Matt Williams! (2015) - Standard Decision.
« Reply #2195 on: September 25, 2015, 09:41:02 pm »
Fire. Matt. Now.

Offline Traded For Mclain

  • Posts: 167
Re: Fire Matt Williams! (2015) - Standard Decision.
« Reply #2196 on: September 25, 2015, 10:47:53 pm »
If MW's fate really is tied to how this team plays out as has been speculated in the press, he's toast. 

Offline welch

  • Posts: 18092
  • The Sweetest Right Handed Swing in 1950s Baseball
Re: Fire Matt Williams! (2015) - Standard Decision.
« Reply #2197 on: September 25, 2015, 11:04:30 pm »
Two things happening - one, bunting as directed by Matt is very poor strategy that, if successful, would result in FEWER runs being scored.  Better to have a runner on 1st with no outs than one on 2nd with 1 out.

But as you observe, being incapable of executing a flawed strategy well is yet another failure.


Depends on where the runner is and the number of outs. If a team has a runner on 3rd with none or one out, a squeeze bunt can result in a run. I've never seen this Nats team do it, but I've seen opposing teams score that way against the Nats. Even more fun: a suicide squeeze.

Otherwise, no, don't bunt a runner from 1B to 2B.

Offline JCA-CrystalCity

  • Global Moderator
  • ****
  • Posts: 45791
  • Platoon - not just a movie, a baseball obsession
Re: Fire Matt Williams! (2015) - Standard Decision.
« Reply #2198 on: September 26, 2015, 10:17:19 am »
Depends on where the runner is and the number of outs. If a team has a runner on 3rd with none or one out, a squeeze bunt can result in a run. I've never seen this Nats team do it, but I've seen opposing teams score that way against the Nats. Even more fun: a suicide squeeze.

Otherwise, no, don't bunt a runner from 1B to 2B.
didn't Davey do it one of his first games managing just to put the thought in opponents' heads?

Offline Baseball is Life

  • Posts: 20393
  • Proud member of the Sunshine Squad.
Re: Fire Matt Williams! (2015) - Standard Decision.
« Reply #2199 on: September 26, 2015, 10:21:01 am »
If MW's fate really is tied to how this team plays out as has been speculated in the press, he's toast. 

I've said all along that how they play out will decide if he keeps his job. I think we have our answer.