0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
I'd rather get no hit then be this bad with RISP.
Isn't that kind of a Stat that could correct itself over the year? Isn't it mostly just bad luck?
Some team is going to be dead last in baseball in hitting with RISP and still be very bad it, throughout the season. It might not even out.
Maybe they should try a sac bunt and a squeeze bunt in that situation since no one can get a clutch hit.
honestly, at this point, I don't know whether you can tell much about how well this offense is going to do over the year. To some extent, the Miami and Mets series probably jack up the overall stats, while the run of great pitchers / tough match ups they've faced distorts it down. For what it is worth, the team is outscoring Atlanta by a half a run a game (4.26 v. 3.76), and is scoring a higher percentage of baserunners (12% v. 11%).http://www.baseball-reference.com/leagues/MLB/2014-situational-batting.shtmlThe 2014 offense is slightly above MLB average in runs per game (4.26 v. 4.20). That 12% in scoring baserunners is below MLB average (14% is average), but is the same as St Louis and just below Boston (13%). Last year, all teams ended up within 1% of average (14%) except St. Louis (17%) and 4 very poor offenses - ChC, MIA, MN, SEA (12%). Cashing in is important, and the best offenses at cashing in runners seem to be the higher scoring ones. none of the teams that were below average in base runner scoring % were above average in runs scored in 2013, while all 8 of the teams that were 15% or higher scored more than MLB average in runs per game. I would not like to see that 12% continue in 2014, even if our overall run scoring is for now above average. I expect we will be around 13- 15% by the end of the year, because that is where most teams end up.
Gonna bump this. Roberto Hernandez and the Phillies crappy bullpen
This one could be a contender for worst of the year
Hi!
Have the Nats ever hit Bronson Arroyo? Every time I think of Arroyo pitching against them I remember futile hitting.