Author Topic: Offseason moves?  (Read 176770 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Online Slateman

  • Posts: 66852
  • THE SUMMONER OF THE REVERSE JINX
Re: Offseason moves?
« Reply #850 on: October 19, 2013, 08:05:55 pm »
Could always play Castellanos in LF . . .

Offline TigerFan

  • Posts: 3890
  • A split allegiance is still an allegiance
Re: Offseason moves?
« Reply #851 on: October 19, 2013, 08:13:11 pm »
Could always play Castellanos in LF . . .

That's right, I had forgotten about him somehow.  Though it was way too short a sample size he did hit well in a couple of game this year.  The biggest need would be 2b and bullpen.

Online Slateman

  • Posts: 66852
  • THE SUMMONER OF THE REVERSE JINX
Re: Offseason moves?
« Reply #852 on: October 19, 2013, 08:30:26 pm »
I think the Tigers bullpen gets addressed in free agency. Brian Wilson and JP Howell. Maybe even a one year deal on Ryan Madson.

Tigers will be looking to trade Schezer for some prospects to re-build the farm.  Not sure the Nats have enough big names unless Rendon is included

Offline Vega

  • Posts: 5516
  • Party’s Over
Re: Offseason moves?
« Reply #853 on: October 19, 2013, 08:35:20 pm »
I think the Tigers bullpen gets addressed in free agency. Brian Wilson and JP Howell. Maybe even a one year deal on Ryan Madson.

Tigers will be looking to trade Schezer for some prospects to re-build the farm.  Not sure the Nats have enough big names unless Rendon is included
Rebuild the farm? Detroit's farm sucked even before the Anibal deal. More like they need to BUILD a farm system.

Online HalfSmokes

  • Posts: 21928
Re: Offseason moves?
« Reply #854 on: October 19, 2013, 08:38:19 pm »
Rebuild the farm? Detroit's farm sucked even before the Anibal deal. More like they need to BUILD a farm system.

I'm sure they wish they had a great farm, just like all those teams that will be good someday boast about

Offline TigerFan

  • Posts: 3890
  • A split allegiance is still an allegiance
Re: Offseason moves?
« Reply #855 on: October 19, 2013, 08:39:18 pm »
I think the Tigers bullpen gets addressed in free agency. Brian Wilson and JP Howell. Maybe even a one year deal on Ryan Madson.

Tigers will be looking to trade Schezer for some prospects to re-build the farm.  Not sure the Nats have enough big names unless Rendon is included

Perhaps they will but I don't see them letting Max go for a bunch of maybe big leaguers.  The Tigers have not recently really cared about their farm system.  They trade for and sign FA to play immediately. 

Online Slateman

  • Posts: 66852
  • THE SUMMONER OF THE REVERSE JINX
Re: Offseason moves?
« Reply #856 on: October 19, 2013, 09:00:30 pm »
Rebuild the farm? Detroit's farm sucked even before the Anibal deal. More like they need to BUILD a farm system.

They had plenty of talent over the past few years. Hence why they were able to trade for Miggy, then Scherzer, then Peralta, then Fister, and most recently Iglesias. They need to re-build it because the last 3-5 years has depleted it.

Perhaps they will but I don't see them letting Max go for a bunch of maybe big leaguers.  The Tigers have not recently really cared about their farm system.  They trade for and sign FA to play immediately. 

Whatever they trade him for will include big name prospects or a big name closer. And I don't see anyone parting with a big name closer. Maybe the Angels would part with Ernesto Frieri but the Tigers would want some prospects and the Angels don't have anyone worth him.

Scherzer would be worth Profar and Joey Butler from the Rangers, IMO. Would be an amazing trade for the Tigers. Put Iglesias at short, Profar at second, Castellanos at third, and alternate Miggy and Fielder at 1B/DH. Butler may be MLB ready and could slot in to LF, albeit, not as much power as a LFer should have.

Offline Mattionals

  • Posts: 5911
Re: Offseason moves?
« Reply #857 on: October 19, 2013, 09:53:16 pm »
Scherzer could easily be a Ranger next season.

Online Slateman

  • Posts: 66852
  • THE SUMMONER OF THE REVERSE JINX
Re: Offseason moves?
« Reply #858 on: October 20, 2013, 02:13:46 pm »
http://sports.yahoo.com/news/los-angeles-dodgers-trade-target-buy-low-washington-212500187--mlb.html

Speculation really. Dodgers could be interested in Espinosa. Would be a buy low type of deal. We'd probably get a reliever out of it.

Online varoadking

  • Posts: 30942
  • King of Goodness
Re: Offseason moves?
« Reply #859 on: October 20, 2013, 02:26:34 pm »
http://sports.yahoo.com/news/los-angeles-dodgers-trade-target-buy-low-washington-212500187--mlb.html

Speculation really. Dodgers could be interested in Espinosa. Would be a buy low type of deal. We'd probably get a reliever out of it.

Rizzo will only overvalue him like he did Haren at the trade deadline...


Offline Lintyfresh85

  • Posts: 35152
  • World Champions!!!
Re: Offseason moves?
« Reply #860 on: October 21, 2013, 12:57:53 pm »
http://sports.yahoo.com/news/los-angeles-dodgers-trade-target-buy-low-washington-212500187--mlb.html

Speculation really. Dodgers could be interested in Espinosa. Would be a buy low type of deal. We'd probably get a reliever out of it.

Not likely anymore. They just signed Cuban 2B - Alexander Guerrero for $26 million to start at 2B next year.

Offline imref

  • Posts: 47647
  • NG Nattitude?
Re: Offseason moves?
« Reply #861 on: October 21, 2013, 01:22:46 pm »
Scherzer could easily be a Ranger next season.

i keep hearing that they are going after Price.

Offline Mr Clean

  • Posts: 4109
Re: Offseason moves?
« Reply #862 on: October 21, 2013, 01:55:59 pm »
Adam Kilgore tweets: Rizzo's last 1st rounder in AZ. Hm. RT @DannyKnoblerCBS  There's a very good chance Tigers trade Scherzer this winter.

Offline blue911

  • Posts: 18599
Re: Offseason moves?
« Reply #863 on: October 21, 2013, 02:00:24 pm »
Adam Kilgore tweets: Rizzo's last 1st rounder in AZ. Hm. RT @DannyKnoblerCBS  There's a very good chance Tigers trade Scherzer this winter.

What's Knobler's reasoning?

Offline UMDNats

  • Posts: 18070
Re: Offseason moves?
« Reply #864 on: October 21, 2013, 02:15:31 pm »
What's Knobler's reasoning?

Knobler is one of many CBS Sports trolls. I'd like to think he has a source telling him that (hopefully more than one, like a good journalist), but he's likely just trying to drum up interest in some speculation column he's working on.

Offline blue911

  • Posts: 18599
Re: Offseason moves?
« Reply #865 on: October 21, 2013, 03:07:26 pm »
Knobler is one of many CBS Sports trolls. I'd like to think he has a source telling him that (hopefully more than one, like a good journalist), but he's likely just trying to drum up interest in some speculation column he's working on.

That's what I figured.

Offline comish4lif

  • Posts: 2936
  • Too Stressed to care.
Re: Offseason moves?
« Reply #866 on: October 21, 2013, 03:22:38 pm »
What's Knobler's reasoning?
Tigers may look to trade Scherzer before he gets too expensive.
Rizzo drafted Scherzer in AZ.
Therefore, IPSO FACTO and QED - Rizzo will trade for Scherzer.

Online JCA-CrystalCity

  • Global Moderator
  • ****
  • Posts: 45872
  • Platoon - not just a movie, a baseball obsession
Re: Offseason moves?
« Reply #867 on: October 21, 2013, 03:43:27 pm »
Joel Sherman had an article on this today for the NY Post.  It looks like other GMs are expecting Max to be on the market, but Dombrowski says no serious talks yet.  That kind of figures because he wrote this less than 24 hours since his last pitch.
http://nypost.com/2013/10/20/detroit-has-big-decisions-to-make-this-offseason/
Quote
The Tigers still move forward in fine shape, with arguably the best hitter (Cabrera) and starter (Verlander) of this era, backed by a strong supporting cast, a top general manager (Dave Dombrowski) and a go-for-it owner (Mike Ilitch). But they have huge decisions that promise repercussions throughout the sport, including in New York.

None is bigger than whether to trade presumptive AL Cy Young winner Max Scherzer. Dombrowski told me, “Anyone who says that has been discussed on a serious level is wrong.”

But I was surprised how many outside executives said Scherzer would absolutely be on the block this winter. And then equally surprised by how many echoed what this AL executive said: “It might be posturing to try to influence Scherzer to engage in a long-term contract. Try to scare him that he will get traded so he can pressure [agent] Scott Boras. It won’t work, but I think that’s the tactic.”

Scherzer can be a free agent after the 2014 campaign. In Cabrera, Fielder and Verlander, Detroit already has three contracts of $20 million-plus annually, and Cabrera comes free after the 2015 season. When I asked if the Tigers could afford four mega-contracts, Dombrowski said in theory, yes, but it would probably mean incorporating inexpensive, youngsters in many areas.

Dombrowski also said, “there have been a lot of things I didn’t think we could do financially, and then we could.” That was a nod to Ilitch, the ailing, 84-year-old owner who has made it clear he wants a title in his lifetime.


Offline blue911

  • Posts: 18599
Re: Offseason moves?
« Reply #868 on: October 21, 2013, 03:54:59 pm »
I think people are over looking Detroit's finances. That had a lower payroll than the Red Sox yet outdraw them by 250K. The topped 3M in attendance for the second year. These folks aren't going away unless management forces them. With new national TV money,their local cable deal and revenue sharing the Tigers should earn about $110M in 2014 that does not include the paying customers which at $30/head (probably too low) is another $90M. They can afford a little more salary.   

Offline Mr Clean

  • Posts: 4109
Re: Offseason moves?
« Reply #869 on: October 21, 2013, 03:57:10 pm »
If Scherzer is a one year rental there is no way I would trade for him unless he signs an extension at the moment of the actual transaction. 

Offline MorseTheHorse

  • Posts: 3172
Re: Offseason moves?
« Reply #870 on: October 21, 2013, 06:38:38 pm »
Don't the Tigers have an owner on his deathbed willing to spend whatever to win?  At least that's the explanation I remember for the huge Fielder overpay.  So unless that guy is dead now, I don't see them trading Scherzer. 

Online zimm_da_kid

  • Posts: 8150
  • The one true ace
Re: Offseason moves?
« Reply #871 on: October 21, 2013, 06:46:17 pm »
Rizzo does love his AZ connections

Offline TigerFan

  • Posts: 3890
  • A split allegiance is still an allegiance
Re: Offseason moves?
« Reply #872 on: October 21, 2013, 07:28:37 pm »
Don't the Tigers have an owner on his deathbed willing to spend whatever to win?  At least that's the explanation I remember for the huge Fielder overpay.  So unless that guy is dead now, I don't see them trading Scherzer.

He is still alive and kicking sort of.  Just because you have the money to spend doesn't make it wise to do so all the time balls to the wall.  If they feel they can be competitive without Max in the starting lineup why not trade him and reinvent the team in other positions?

To me, it feels like it could be a trade five years down the road where you think WTF were they thinking but only time can tell and this isn't even a done deal yet.   

Offline LightningMcQueen

  • Posts: 213
Re: Offseason moves?
« Reply #873 on: October 21, 2013, 07:29:14 pm »
Somewhat of a different route then some of you are discussing, but apparently there are Jose Bautista rumors of that the Blue Jays are at least thinking of trading him. I know, a 32 year old corner outfielder who only hit .258 last year, but when healthy the guy is one of the best power threats in baseball since 2010. He also played 3rd for Toronto. I really don't know where he'd go, unless you move Harper to CF and Span becomes your 4th outfielder. Guy has a rifle arm, can hit the ball a ton, and his $$$ is not overpriced. I know TO wants 2B so Rendon may be needed to complete a deal, but as far as size able shake ups, this would be one.

Just throwin' it out there for conversation. Don't crucify me!

Offline imref

  • Posts: 47647
  • NG Nattitude?
Re: Offseason moves?
« Reply #874 on: October 21, 2013, 10:36:08 pm »