Author Topic: Fielder (Read 287039 times)

NatsDad14 · « **Reply #1950 on:** January 10, 2012, 04:39:02 pm »

Brilliant idea. If LAC is officially dead, couldn't Lerner afford $20,000 to buy a panic monkey to go off in the 6th inning every time the Nats are losing?

tomterp · « **Reply #1951 on:** January 10, 2012, 04:39:47 pm »

Quote from: natsfan4evr on January 10, 2012, 04:38:47 pm

Tweeted by Kilgore:

Wow, better than even odds.

ASSCLOWN

Ray D · « **Reply #1952 on:** January 10, 2012, 04:49:17 pm »

Quote from: natsfan4evr on January 10, 2012, 04:38:47 pm

Tweeted by Kilgore:

I think the chances of the Os, Ms, or Brewers are zero. it comes down to: if the Rangers sign Darvish we get Fielder. If they don't we don't.

zimm_da_kid · « **Reply #1953 on:** January 10, 2012, 04:56:08 pm »

Quote from: natsfan4evr on January 10, 2012, 04:38:47 pm

Tweeted by Kilgore:

Sign Fielder

natspride · « **Reply #1954 on:** January 10, 2012, 04:59:23 pm »

Quote from: zimm_da_kid on January 10, 2012, 04:56:08 pm

Sign Fielder

This.

natsfan4evr · « **Reply #1955 on:** January 10, 2012, 04:59:45 pm »

Quote from: Ray D on January 10, 2012, 04:49:17 pm

I think the chances of the Os, Ms, or Brewers are zero. it comes down to: if the Rangers sign Darvish we get Fielder. If they don't we don't.

Even if they don't sign Darvish, there is no guarantee they will go all out for Prince. I do agree however that if they sign Darvish, the chance of us getting Fielder will improve substantially.

Ray D · « **Reply #1956 on:** January 10, 2012, 05:07:53 pm »

Quote from: natsfan4evr on January 10, 2012, 04:59:45 pm

Even if they don't sign Darvish, there is no guarantee they will go all out for Prince.

If Boras and the Rangers don't have some sort of secret agreement, pending the Darvish resolution, then what else could Boras and Fielder be waiting for?

houston-nat · « **Reply #1957 on:** January 10, 2012, 05:12:31 pm »

Quote from: Ray D on January 10, 2012, 05:07:53 pm

If Boras and the Rangers don't have some sort of secret agreement, pending the Darvish resolution, then what else could Boras and Fielder be waiting for?

Plausibly, we have a lowball offer and a "take it or leave it, that's final" stance, and Boras and Fielder are waiting for someone - anyone - to top it, or for someone - anyone - to force us to raise our offer.

Ray D · « **Reply #1958 on:** January 10, 2012, 05:21:26 pm »

But what possible team is left, that we haven't ruled out?

Lintyfresh85 · « **Reply #1959 on:** January 10, 2012, 05:22:17 pm »

Dodgers, Blue Jays, Brewers

zimm_da_kid · « **Reply #1960 on:** January 10, 2012, 05:23:28 pm »

Quote from: Lintyfresh85 on January 10, 2012, 05:22:17 pm

Dodgers, Blue Jays, Brewers

i seriously doubt the dodgers but id do think the brew crew and jays are legit possibilities

HalfSmokes · « **Reply #1961 on:** January 10, 2012, 05:24:59 pm »

Quote from: Ray D on January 10, 2012, 05:21:26 pm

But what possible team is left, that we haven't ruled out?

Rangers?

Five Banners · « **Reply #1962 on:** January 10, 2012, 05:25:45 pm »

Quote from: natsfan4evr on January 10, 2012, 04:59:45 pm

Even if they don't sign Darvish, there is no guarantee they will go all out for Prince. I do agree however that if they sign Darvish, the chance of us getting Fielder will improve substantially.

http://www.nesn.com/2012/01/report-rangers-offering-yu-darvish-dice-k-money.html

Report: Rangers Offering Yu Darvish 'Dice-K Money'

Heyman says it's unknown whether $52 million is the exact amount offered or if the offer is for six years, as was the case with Matsuzaka in 2007, when he received a six-year deal worth $52 million. Texas' offer for Darvish reportedly could be for five years.

Five Banners · « **Reply #1963 on:** January 10, 2012, 05:27:26 pm »

Heyman's original piece has the Freudian slip of the year: "The Rangers are concentrating completely on Darvish at the moment, and if a deal is struck, their chances to make a real run at star free agent slugger Price Fielder would be diminished." Pay the Price for success, NATS!

imref · « **Reply #1964 on:** January 10, 2012, 05:28:13 pm »

Quote from: Lintyfresh85 on January 10, 2012, 05:22:17 pm

Dodgers, Blue Jays, Brewers

maybe the Rays for a 1 year deal too?

zimm_da_kid · « **Reply #1965 on:** January 10, 2012, 05:28:28 pm »

Quote from: imref on January 10, 2012, 05:28:13 pm

maybe the Rays for a 1 year deal too?

no chance

Ray D · « **Reply #1966 on:** January 10, 2012, 05:35:18 pm »

Quote from: HalfSmokes on January 10, 2012, 05:24:59 pm

Rangers?

Yes I meant besides the Rangers. Certainly if they don't sign Darvish there is a good chance they will sign Fielder. My point is that it they do sign Darvish (and everyone thinks they will, except me) then they certainly won't sign Fielder.

InsaneBoost · « **Reply #1967 on:** January 10, 2012, 05:39:34 pm »

So Rangers, Nationals and Dodgers, interesting.

HalfSmokes · « **Reply #1968 on:** January 10, 2012, 05:39:58 pm »

Quote from: Ray D on January 10, 2012, 05:35:18 pm

Yes I meant besides the Rangers. Certainly if they don't sign Darvish there is a good chance they will sign Fielder. My point is that it they do sign Darvish (and everyone thinks they will, except me) then they certainly won't sign Fielder.

I think mlbtr thinks no now, I certainly think no- they're certainly lowballing him now

zimm_da_kid · « **Reply #1969 on:** January 10, 2012, 05:41:04 pm »

Quote from: InsaneBoost on January 10, 2012, 05:39:34 pm

So Rangers, Nationals and Dodgers, interesting.

is this based on your "source"?

InsaneBoost · « **Reply #1970 on:** January 10, 2012, 05:42:00 pm »

Quote from: zimm_da_kid on January 10, 2012, 05:41:04 pm

is this based on your "source"?

I contacted someone I felt has some knowledge on the whole thing and yes, that's what I was told.

Ray D · « **Reply #1971 on:** January 10, 2012, 05:42:19 pm »

Quote from: InsaneBoost on January 10, 2012, 05:39:34 pm

So Rangers, Nationals and Dodgers, interesting.

I don't see how the Dodgers can sufficiently resolve their ownership situation soon enough for a deal of this magnitude.

InsaneBoost · « **Reply #1972 on:** January 10, 2012, 05:43:19 pm »

Quote from: Ray D on January 10, 2012, 05:42:19 pm

I don't see how the Dodgers can sufficiently resolve their ownership situation soon enough for a deal of this magnitude.

That's what I responded with. They just paid Kemp what, 160mil? Think it'd be hard when I believe another big player of theirs needs to be signed as well.

HalfSmokes · « **Reply #1973 on:** January 10, 2012, 05:45:35 pm »

Quote from: InsaneBoost on January 10, 2012, 05:43:19 pm

That's what I responded with. They just paid Kemp what, 160mil? Think it'd be hard when I believe another big player of theirs needs to be signed as well.

more that they don't have an owner to sign off on the deal- wasn't McCourt still in charge for the kemp deal?

InsaneBoost · « **Reply #1974 on:** January 10, 2012, 05:47:08 pm »

That I'm not 100% sure of.