Author Topic: The "Former Nat Watch" Thread (2011)  (Read 55263 times)

0 Members and 6 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Lintyfresh85

  • Posts: 35152
  • World Champions!!!
Re: The "Former Nat Watch" Thread (2011)
« Reply #525 on: August 10, 2011, 12:05:49 pm »
I'll believe that when I see it - he's the worst regular player in recent history right now.

Have you ever heard of Brandon Wood?

Offline houston-nat

  • Posts: 19056
Re: The "Former Nat Watch" Thread (2011)
« Reply #526 on: August 10, 2011, 12:11:09 pm »
Is Dunn still on pace for the worst season in 120 years?

Offline Kevrock

  • Posts: 13806
  • That’s gonna be a no from me, dog
Re: The "Former Nat Watch" Thread (2011)
« Reply #527 on: August 10, 2011, 12:15:47 pm »
All Dunn has to do is come back to the National League and he will hit again.

LOL. His interleague stats disagree.

.063/.182/.083    .265    OPS 0 HR.

Offline Lintyfresh85

  • Posts: 35152
  • World Champions!!!
Re: The "Former Nat Watch" Thread (2011)
« Reply #528 on: August 10, 2011, 12:17:16 pm »
LOL. His interleague stats disagree.

.063/.182/.083    .265    OPS 0 HR.

Look, I get it that it's cool to clown on Dunn around this board... but picking, what, 10 games to say he couldn't still hit in the NL is a bit ridiculous.

Offline tomterp

  • Global Moderator
  • ****
  • Posts: 33885
  • Hell yes!
Re: The "Former Nat Watch" Thread (2011)
« Reply #529 on: August 10, 2011, 12:27:42 pm »
Look, I get it that it's cool to clown on Dunn around this board... but picking, what, 10 games to say he couldn't still hit in the NL is a bit ridiculous.


Isn't it also pretty ridiculous to assume that changing leagues is going to allow some magic mojo to descend on Dunn, restoring him to his former glory?

AL pitchers are selected from the same pool of candidates that NL pitchers are.  Pitchers in both leagues are traded back and forth, become free agents, sign with teams in other leagues, etc.  There's not some big dramatic difference between them, unless you believe in voodoo.

Offline EdStroud

  • Posts: 10139
Re: The "Former Nat Watch" Thread (2011)
« Reply #530 on: August 10, 2011, 12:57:19 pm »
Position Players who are ex-Nationals and still in National League(some like Wily Mo Pena may have been released or demoted)

Player           Age    G    PA    AB    R    H    2B    3B    HR    RBI    SB    CS    BB    SO    BA    OBP    SLG    OPS
Endy Chavez   33    50   180  165   27   51    8     2       5      22     6      3      8     17   .309   .335   .473   .808
Willie Harris    33    85   183  158   25   38    9     0       1      12     4      4     22    52   .241   .344   .316   .661
E. Bonifacio    26   106   427  373  58  107   18    4       2      18    27     7     42     87   .287   .359   .373   .732
B. Schneider   34    27     94    84    8    15    4     0      2       7      0      0      8     21   .179   .255   .298   .553
Pete Orr         32    29     69    63    5   15    3     0       0       3      1      0      5     10   .238   .304   .286   .590
Nyjer Morgan  30    77   266   242  39   79   13     6      3      27      6      3      6     47   .326   .360   .467   .827
Felipe Lopez   31    10    40     34    4    8     0     0       0      3       0      0      3      5    .235   .289   .235   .525
Jerry Hairston 35     6     14     14    3    3     1     0       0      0       0      0      0      1    .214   .214   .286   .500
A. Soriano      35    97   357   337  38  82    16    0      19     53      1      1     18     85   .243   .283   .460   .743
Marlon Byrd    33    76   311   290  39  89    18    2       6      22      2      1     13     53   .307   .350   .445   .795
Wily Mo Pena 29    17    46     46    7   9      0     0       5      7       0      0      0      19   .196   .196   .522   .717
Jamey Carroll 37   106   377   333  40  99    13    4       0      10    10      0     37     43   .297   .368   .360   .729
Josh Wilson   30    36    54     51    9  14     4     0       2       3      1      0      3      14   .275   .315   .471   .785
Wil Nieves     33    20   54     50    2    7     2     0      0        0      0      0      3      12   .140   .189   .180   .369
C. Patterson  31    11    29     28    3    6     2     0      0       2       0      1      1       6   .214    .241   .286   .527
A. Gonzalez   28    72   194   181  15  38     6     1      1      25       1     2       9      28  .210    .253   .271   .523
* if I missed any let me know and I will add to list  
  
  
      

Offline EdStroud

  • Posts: 10139
Re: The "Former Nat Watch" Thread (2011)
« Reply #531 on: August 10, 2011, 01:04:46 pm »
I'll believe that when I see it - he's the worst regular player in recent history right now.

Hey with the numbers he has put up you could no doubt be correct.  There are some players who for some reason or another need time to adjust to or just hit better in the National or American Leagues. 

Offline EdStroud

  • Posts: 10139
Re: The "Former Nat Watch" Thread (2011)
« Reply #532 on: August 10, 2011, 01:15:35 pm »

Isn't it also pretty ridiculous to assume that changing leagues is going to allow some magic mojo to descend on Dunn, restoring him to his former glory?

AL pitchers are selected from the same pool of candidates that NL pitchers are.  Pitchers in both leagues are traded back and forth, become free agents, sign with teams in other leagues, etc.  There's not some big dramatic difference between them, unless you believe in voodoo.

IMHO....

The biggest difference to me is that in the National League batters seem to be challenged more.  In the American League pitchers seem to accept deeper counts and walks alittle more.

Offline Kevrock

  • Posts: 13806
  • That’s gonna be a no from me, dog
Re: The "Former Nat Watch" Thread (2011)
« Reply #533 on: August 10, 2011, 01:20:09 pm »
Look, I get it that it's cool to clown on Dunn around this board... but picking, what, 10 games to say he couldn't still hit in the NL is a bit ridiculous.

I wasn't clowning on Dunn, I was responding to a mindfact with the largest sample size available (14 games).

You're too sensitive about Dunn. No one here is rooting against him. His season has been surprising, historic, and oddly fascinating.

Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 76956
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: The "Former Nat Watch" Thread (2011)
« Reply #534 on: August 10, 2011, 01:25:16 pm »

You're too sensitive about Dunn. No one here is rooting against him.

There are a couple who are rooting against him.


Offline blue911

  • Posts: 18596
Re: The "Former Nat Watch" Thread (2011)
« Reply #535 on: August 10, 2011, 01:40:23 pm »
I wasn't clowning on Dunn, I was responding to a mindfact with the largest sample size available (14 games).

You're too sensitive about Dunn. No one here is rooting against him. His season has been surprising, historic, and oddly fascinating.

IMO what really stands out is how ineffective he has been against lefties. And Ozzie not wanting him probably doesn't help his confidence.

Offline MarquisDeSade

  • Posts: 15101
  • Captain Sadness
Re: The "Former Nat Watch" Thread (2011)
« Reply #536 on: August 10, 2011, 02:17:38 pm »
And Ozzie not wanting him probably doesn't help his confidence.

Outside of AJ and Paulie who has Ozzie wanted?

Offline PANatsFan

  • Posts: 37398
  • dogs in uncensored, nudes in gameday
Re: The "Former Nat Watch" Thread (2011)
« Reply #537 on: August 10, 2011, 02:51:58 pm »
IMHO....

The biggest difference to me is that in the National League batters seem to be challenged more.  In the American League pitchers seem to accept deeper counts and walks alittle more.

He's good at walks and deep counts, though.

Offline EdStroud

  • Posts: 10139
Re: The "Former Nat Watch" Thread (2011)
« Reply #538 on: August 10, 2011, 04:10:20 pm »
He's good at walks and deep counts, though.

If I were a GM I'd still take a chance he bounces back next year.  Like someone else said maybe he and Ozzie dont get along?

Offline PANatsFan

  • Posts: 37398
  • dogs in uncensored, nudes in gameday
Re: The "Former Nat Watch" Thread (2011)
« Reply #539 on: August 10, 2011, 04:41:50 pm »
If I were a GM I'd still take a chance he bounces back next year.  Like someone else said maybe he and Ozzie dont get along?

That makes him kinda of a bad sport then if he can't play through it? It's really bizarre, maybe he needs a hypnotist or something.

Offline houston-nat

  • Posts: 19056
Re: The "Former Nat Watch" Thread (2011)
« Reply #540 on: August 10, 2011, 05:20:10 pm »
That makes him kinda of a bad sport then if he can't play through it? It's really bizarre, maybe he needs a hypnotist or something.

Yoooooooouuuuuu are getting hiiitterisssshhhhh....

Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 76956
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: The "Former Nat Watch" Thread (2011)
« Reply #541 on: August 10, 2011, 06:49:26 pm »
That makes him kinda of a bad sport then if he can't play through it? It's really bizarre, maybe he needs a hypnotist or something.

SFnyanPANatsFan

Offline mitlen

  • Posts: 66171
  • We had 'em all the way.
Re: The "Former Nat Watch" Thread (2011)
« Reply #542 on: August 11, 2011, 09:26:29 am »
Position Players who are ex-Nationals and still in National League(some like Wily Mo Pena may have been released or demoted)

Player           Age    G    PA    AB    R    H    2B    3B    HR    RBI    SB    CS    BB    SO    BA    OBP    SLG    OPS
Endy Chavez   33    50   180  165   27   51    8     2       5      22     6      3      8     17   .309   .335   .473   .808
Willie Harris    33    85   183  158   25   38    9     0       1      12     4      4     22    52   .241   .344   .316   .661
E. Bonifacio    26   106   427  373  58  107   18    4       2      18    27     7     42     87   .287   .359   .373   .732
B. Schneider   34    27     94    84    8    15    4     0      2       7      0      0      8     21   .179   .255   .298   .553
Pete Orr         32    29     69    63    5   15    3     0       0       3      1      0      5     10   .238   .304   .286   .590
Nyjer Morgan  30    77   266   242  39   79   13     6      3      27      6      3      6     47   .326   .360   .467   .827
Felipe Lopez   31    10    40     34    4    8     0     0       0      3       0      0      3      5    .235   .289   .235   .525
Jerry Hairston 35     6     14     14    3    3     1     0       0      0       0      0      0      1    .214   .214   .286   .500
A. Soriano      35    97   357   337  38  82    16    0      19     53      1      1     18     85   .243   .283   .460   .743
Marlon Byrd    33    76   311   290  39  89    18    2       6      22      2      1     13     53   .307   .350   .445   .795
Wily Mo Pena 29    17    46     46    7   9      0     0       5      7       0      0      0      19   .196   .196   .522   .717
Jamey Carroll 37   106   377   333  40  99    13    4       0      10    10      0     37     43   .297   .368   .360   .729
Josh Wilson   30    36    54     51    9  14     4     0       2       3      1      0      3      14   .275   .315   .471   .785
Wil Nieves     33    20   54     50    2    7     2     0      0        0      0      0      3      12   .140   .189   .180   .369
C. Patterson  31    11    29     28    3    6     2     0      0       2       0      1      1       6   .214    .241   .286   .527

* if I missed any let me know and I will add to list   
 
       

That's good stuff, Ed.   Thanks

Offline NatsDad14

  • Posts: 5241
Re: The "Former Nat Watch" Thread (2011)
« Reply #543 on: August 11, 2011, 12:12:54 pm »

For some reason PANatsFan finds something irresistible about Marquis that Dunn does not have.
Well PaNatsFan has a lot more in common with Marquis than Dunn.

Offline Lintyfresh85

  • Posts: 35152
  • World Champions!!!
Re: The "Former Nat Watch" Thread (2011)
« Reply #544 on: August 11, 2011, 12:16:04 pm »
Well PaNatsFan has a lot more in common with Marquis than Dunn.

:popcorn:

Offline EdStroud

  • Posts: 10139
Re: The "Former Nat Watch" Thread (2011)
« Reply #545 on: August 11, 2011, 12:53:30 pm »
ex-Nationals Pitchers in the National League

Pitcher         Age  W  L  W-L%  ERA   G  GS GF CG SHO SV   IP   H   R   ER  HR BB   K   WHIP
B Sanches      32   4   1  .800    3.38  36  2   8   0    0    0  58.2 46  27  22   4  33   49  1.347
M Batista       40   3   2  .600    4.60  26  1   2   0    0    0  29.1 27  20  15   2  19   16  1.568
J Hanrahan     29   0   1  .000    1.06  50  0  44  0    0   30 51.0  37  7    6    1   8    43  0.882
Joe Beimel     34   1   1  .500    4.24  31  0   7   0    0    0  23.1 29  13  11   3   7    17  1.543
Tim Wood      28   0   3  .000    5.63  13  0   5   0    0    0   8.0   8   5    5    1   8     2  2.000
Bill Bray         28   2   2  .500    2.41  60  0   8   0    0    0 37.1 26   10 10    1 14    32  1.071
Ramon Ortiz   38   0   2  .000    6.98   7   2   0   0    0    0 19.1 23   17 15    5   7    15  1.552
J Marquis       32   0   1  .000   12.38   2   2   0   0    0    0  8.0 19   15 11     2  3     3   2.750
M MacDougal  34   0   1  .000    2.13  51   0  10  0    0    1 42.1 38   13 10    2 21    28  1.394
 

Offline PANatsFan

  • Posts: 37398
  • dogs in uncensored, nudes in gameday
Re: The "Former Nat Watch" Thread (2011)
« Reply #546 on: August 11, 2011, 03:27:52 pm »
*yawn*

Offline NatsDad14

  • Posts: 5241
Re: The "Former Nat Watch" Thread (2011)
« Reply #547 on: August 12, 2011, 01:34:00 pm »
*yawn*
I don't know about that. Those pitchers seem like they are doing a good job away from the Nats.

Offline imref

  • Posts: 47473
  • NG Nattitude?
Re: The "Former Nat Watch" Thread (2011)
« Reply #548 on: August 12, 2011, 01:41:13 pm »
Indians designate Austin Kearns for assignment.  he's batting .200 / .302 / .287 this year.

Maybe we could sign him to improve our leadoff production?

Offline PANatsFan

  • Posts: 37398
  • dogs in uncensored, nudes in gameday
Re: The "Former Nat Watch" Thread (2011)
« Reply #549 on: August 12, 2011, 02:03:19 pm »
I don't know about that. Those pitchers seem like they are doing a good job away from the Nats.

The yawn is to the haterz on the thread.