Author Topic: Nationals new 1B discussion (Read 76161 times)

HalfSmokes · « **Reply #1425 on:** January 02, 2011, 02:48:54 pm »

Quote from: Lintyfresh85 on January 02, 2011, 02:33:09 pm

O's better than the Nats.

Unfortunately, I don't think its even close.

Wieters isn't what people thought he'd be, Markaikis is regressing, Jones sucks, Roberts is old and injured, at least as far as position players go they suck far worse than us

hammondsnats · « **Reply #1426 on:** January 02, 2011, 02:48:55 pm »

Quote from: Lintyfresh85 on January 02, 2011, 02:33:09 pm

O's better than the Nats.

Unfortunately, I don't think its even close.

This. And I know spider is going to come on here with some stupid, tired knock on me, but the Os are better than the Nats unfortunately.

And I'm sorry but I find it funny that some of the people on here crapting on the Os are the same ones that are overly optimistic of the nats upcoming season.

PANatsFan · « **Reply #1427 on:** January 02, 2011, 02:56:09 pm »

Quote from: hammondsnats on January 02, 2011, 02:48:55 pm

This. And I know spider is going to come on here with some stupid, tired knock on me, but the Os are better than the Nats unfortunately.

And I'm sorry but I find it funny that some of the people on here crapting on the Os are the same ones that are overly optimistic of the nats upcoming season.

The o's suck. Suck suck suck. Horrible starting pitching. Now, the Nats are in the same boat for next season. we have Strasburg, however.

cmdterps44 · « **Reply #1428 on:** January 02, 2011, 03:00:24 pm »

Quote from: PANatsFan on January 02, 2011, 02:56:09 pm

The o's suck. Suck suck suck. Horrible starting pitching. Now, the Nats are in the same boat for next season. we have Strasburg, however.

I'd take their lineup over ours at the moment, especially in that box.

hammondsnats · « **Reply #1429 on:** January 02, 2011, 03:00:32 pm »

Quote from: PANatsFan on January 02, 2011, 02:56:09 pm

The o's suck. Suck suck suck. Horrible starting pitching. Now, the Nats are in the same boat for next season. we have Strasburg, however.

their pitching is going to be better than ours. they have a better all around OF (although Werth > Markakis), better C (as much as I think Wieters is overrated), better 2B, SS is probably a wash and right now a better 1B.

nats have a better bullpen and 3b and that's about it. wake up.

Lintyfresh85 · « **Reply #1430 on:** January 02, 2011, 03:05:01 pm »

Lineups - O's
Rotation - O's
Bullpen - Nats

Overall - O's

Quote from: HalfSmokes on January 02, 2011, 02:48:54 pm

Wieters isn't what people thought he'd be, Markaikis is regressing, Jones sucks, Roberts is old and injured, at least as far as position players go they suck far worse than us

Not even close.

C - Weiters - .249/.319/.377/.695

C - Nats in 2010 -
Pudge - .266/.294/.347/.640
Ramos - .269/.296/.404/.700

Weiters is better... simply because he plays every game... Pudge plays more than Ramos

1B - Lee - .260/.347/.428/.774
1B - Nats - None - Even if LaRoche.... O's still better

2B - Roberts - .278/.354/.391/.745
2B - Espinosa - .214/.277/.447/.723

O's win, again

3B - Nats win

SS - Hardy - .268/.320/.394/.714
SS - Desmond - .269/.308/.392/.700

O's win, again... Hardy better hitter, can actually field.

So, the only guy that is better is Zimmerman.

LF - Scott - .284/.368/.535/.902
LF - Bernadina - .246/.307/.384/.691

Really? O's kill us

CF - Jones - .284/.325/.442/.767
CF - Morgan - .253/.319/.314/.633

This is a joke, right?

RF - Markakis - .297/.370/.436/.805
RF - Werth - .296/.388/.532/.921

Werth wins.

So, a grand total of two players on the Nats that are better.

We suck.

HalfSmokes · « **Reply #1431 on:** January 02, 2011, 03:11:55 pm »

Quote from: hammondsnats on January 02, 2011, 03:00:32 pm

their pitching is going to be better than ours. they have a better all around OF (although Werth > Markakis), better C (as much as I think Wieters is overrated), better 2B, SS is probably a wash and right now a better 1B.

nats have a better bullpen and 3b and that's about it. wake up.

If we get LaRoche, I'd take him over Lee. 2b, they win until a month into the season when Roberts has a back ache and is done for the season. SS, I'd take Desmond, especially going forward, but that is arguable. We have the better 3b. I'd give us RF too. They have the better CF, and both have terrible LF. C, I think weiters is better, but he's not the superstar he was supposed to be.

hammondsnats · « **Reply #1432 on:** January 02, 2011, 03:15:12 pm »

Quote from: HalfSmokes on January 02, 2011, 03:11:55 pm

If we get LaRoche, I'd take him over Lee. 2b, they win until a month into the season when Roberts has a back ache and is done for the season. SS, I'd take Desmond, especially going forward, but that is arguable. We have the better 3b. I'd give us RF too. They have the better CF, and both have terrible LF. C, I think weiters is better, but he's not the superstar he was supposed to be.

Dude anyone could get hurt, you can't use that in this argument.

Id probably take desmond/espinosa @ ss over the os current ss situation.

We don't have laroche (yet) so that's why I was saying right now theirs is better.

Lintyfresh85 · « **Reply #1433 on:** January 02, 2011, 03:21:37 pm »

Quote from: HalfSmokes on January 02, 2011, 03:11:55 pm

If we get LaRoche, I'd take him over Lee.

You're the only one.

Quote from: HalfSmokes on January 02, 2011, 03:11:55 pm

SS, I'd take Desmond, especially going forward, but that is arguable.

Same thing as I said last time.

Nats suck.

HalfSmokes · « **Reply #1434 on:** January 02, 2011, 03:22:06 pm »

Quote from: hammondsnats on January 02, 2011, 03:15:12 pm

Dude anyone could get hurt, you can't use that in this argument.

Id probably take desmond/espinosa @ ss over the os current ss situation.

We don't have laroche (yet) so that's why I was saying right now theirs is better.

If you think a 33 year old middle infielder with a bad back projects to play the whole season go for it. Going forward, I would defiantly take Espinosa, and will laugh as Roberts' contract becomes an albatross

PatsNats28 · « **Reply #1435 on:** January 02, 2011, 03:22:36 pm »

I think they're pretty close, I suspect the Os are better though. Keep in mind that they face a tougher schedule, so just because we might have a better record than them, it doesn't mean that we're better.

PANatsFan · « **Reply #1436 on:** January 02, 2011, 03:22:51 pm »

Quote from: hammondsnats on January 02, 2011, 03:00:32 pm

their pitching is going to be better than ours. they have a better all around OF (although Werth > Markakis), better C (as much as I think Wieters is overrated), better 2B, SS is probably a wash and right now a better 1B.

nats have a better bullpen and 3b and that's about it. wake up.

You need to learn to read. I said both teams suck, true. Both teams have bad rotations, true. Nats have Strasburg coming back, true. I didn't compare the teams and certainly didn't compare the lineups.

HalfSmokes · « **Reply #1437 on:** January 02, 2011, 03:23:46 pm »

Quote from: Lintyfresh85 on January 02, 2011, 03:21:37 pm

You're the only one.

then please explain why Lee has a one year deal while LaRoche has offers for two years? Even the Os initially preferred LaRoche

PatsNats28 · « **Reply #1438 on:** January 02, 2011, 03:25:47 pm »

he's younger

cmdterps44 · « **Reply #1439 on:** January 02, 2011, 03:26:04 pm »

Quote from: PANatsFan on January 02, 2011, 03:22:51 pm

You need to learn to read. I said both teams suck, true. Both teams have bad rotations, true. Nats have Strasburg coming back, true. I didn't compare the teams and certainly didn't compare the lineups.

You said the O's suck. suck suck suck. One can only take that as an obvious hate towards the O's. Then you said, the nats are in the same boat. After you said their pitching staff sucks. So it would seem that you mean the Os suck more than the Nats.

hammondsnats · « **Reply #1440 on:** January 02, 2011, 03:26:25 pm »

Quote from: PANatsFan on January 02, 2011, 03:22:51 pm

You need to learn to read. I said both teams suck, true. Both teams have bad rotations, true. Nats have Strasburg coming back, true. I didn't compare the teams and certainly didn't compare the lineups.

I was simply saying the os are better than nats and why bring up strasburg he is not a part of our immediate future.

I was comparing them and the Os are better. Chill out.

PANatsFan · « **Reply #1441 on:** January 02, 2011, 03:26:32 pm »

Quote from: cmdterps44 on January 02, 2011, 03:26:04 pm

You said the O's suck. suck suck suck. One can only take that as an obvious hate towards the O's. Then you said, the nats are in the same boat. After you said their pitching staff sucks. So it would seem that you mean the Os suck more than the Nats.

I hate the O's, love the Nats. Neither is a playoff team.

hammondsnats · « **Reply #1442 on:** January 02, 2011, 03:26:57 pm »

Quote from: cmdterps44 on January 02, 2011, 03:26:04 pm

You said the O's suck. suck suck suck. One can only take that as an obvious hate towards the O's. Then you said, the nats are in the same boat. After you said their pitching staff sucks. So it would seem that you mean the Os suck more than the Nats.

Lol yup

/ sanity!

cmdterps44 · « **Reply #1443 on:** January 02, 2011, 03:27:22 pm »

Quote from: PANatsFan on January 02, 2011, 03:26:32 pm

I hate the O's, love the Nats. Neither is a playoff team.

Understandable. But again, I was merely picking apart your original post which is why hammonds responded to it in the way he did.

Lintyfresh85 · « **Reply #1444 on:** January 02, 2011, 03:27:25 pm »

Quote from: PANatsFan on January 02, 2011, 03:26:32 pm

I hate the O's, love the Nats. Neither is a playoff team.

Doesn't mean the O's wouldn't kick our ass if we played 162 times.

PANatsFan · « **Reply #1445 on:** January 02, 2011, 03:27:28 pm »

Quote from: hammondsnats on January 02, 2011, 03:26:25 pm

I was simply saying the os are better than nats and why bring up strasburg he is not a part of our immediate future.

I was comparing them and the Os are better. Chill out.

In a year and a half Strasburg will change the face of Nats pitching. O's have nothing like that waiting in the wings. Also, you told me to "wake up" - neither team is good, not sure what I'm sleeping on.

PANatsFan · « **Reply #1446 on:** January 02, 2011, 03:27:44 pm »

Quote from: hammondsnats on January 02, 2011, 03:26:57 pm

Lol yup / sanity!

hammondsnats · « **Reply #1447 on:** January 02, 2011, 03:28:10 pm »

Quote from: PANatsFan on January 02, 2011, 03:26:32 pm

I hate the O's, love the Nats. Neither is a playoff team.

Jesus dude nobody is saying that and that's not what the point is...we are arguing who is better.

Now back on track sign laroche.

hammondsnats · « **Reply #1448 on:** January 02, 2011, 03:29:19 pm »

Quote from: PANatsFan on January 02, 2011, 03:27:44 pm

/ sanity!!!!!!!!

Lintyfresh85 · « **Reply #1449 on:** January 02, 2011, 03:29:47 pm »

Quote from: PANatsFan on January 02, 2011, 03:27:28 pm

In a year and a half Strasburg will change the face of Nats pitching. O's have nothing like that waiting in the wings. Also, you told me to "wake up" - neither team is good, not sure what I'm sleeping on.

The only question was, who was better.

Answer the question.