Author Topic: Nationals new 1B discussion  (Read 76537 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline comish4lif

  • Posts: 2936
  • Too Stressed to care.
Re: Nationals new 1B discussion
« Reply #25 on: December 02, 2010, 05:34:07 pm »
Some of us realize that the offseason is 3-4 months long.
And some of us can read the handwriting on the wall.

Offline ronnynat

  • Posts: 23269
Re: Nationals new 1B discussion
« Reply #26 on: December 02, 2010, 05:49:19 pm »
I'd be happy with LaRoche or moving Morse with an OF brought in.

Rizzo has time but he needs to step up and make the offseason work.

LaRoche hit .306/.351/.573 with RISP last season. Not bad.  (Dunn hit .217/.335/.427)

Offline PC

  • Posts: 47236
Re: Nationals new 1B discussion
« Reply #27 on: December 02, 2010, 05:52:59 pm »
In addition to names and stats, you might to add salary expectations...cuz you know that's a huge part of the FO's thinking.

Offline Potomac Cannons

  • Posts: 3279
Re: Nationals new 1B discussion
« Reply #28 on: December 02, 2010, 05:53:05 pm »
LaRoche hit .306/.351/.573 with RISP last season. Not bad.  (Dunn hit .217/.335/.427)

I'm just thinking you've got a guy who's just about a lock for .800+ OPS (30+ 2B, 25 HR) and a significant defensive upgrade.

Offline Lintyfresh85

  • Posts: 35152
  • World Champions!!!
Re: Nationals new 1B discussion
« Reply #29 on: December 02, 2010, 05:53:15 pm »
LaRoche hit .306/.351/.573 with RISP last season. Not bad.  (Dunn hit .217/.335/.427)

Too bad the Nats don't have any players capable of becoming RISP.

Re: Nationals new 1B discussion
« Reply #30 on: December 02, 2010, 05:55:18 pm »
One year contract for LaRoche.  I'm just really pissed that Dunn is gone.

Offline The Chief

  • Posts: 31839
    • http://www.wnff.net
Re: Nationals new 1B discussion
« Reply #31 on: December 02, 2010, 05:56:45 pm »
Don't we already have a Dunn replacement thread?  Or would everyone prefer we stick with this now that the replacement is no longer "hypothetical"?

Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 76956
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: Nationals new 1B discussion
« Reply #32 on: December 02, 2010, 05:57:47 pm »
Spin mode on


Offline Potomac Cannons

  • Posts: 3279
Re: Nationals new 1B discussion
« Reply #33 on: December 02, 2010, 05:59:11 pm »
One year contract for LaRoche.  I'm just really pissed that Dunn is gone.

I'd go 2 years for LaRoche.  1 for any of the others out there (Berkman, Lee, etc.).

Offline JCA-CrystalCity

  • Global Moderator
  • ****
  • Posts: 45881
  • Platoon - not just a movie, a baseball obsession
Re: Nationals new 1B discussion
« Reply #34 on: December 02, 2010, 05:59:15 pm »
merge.

(la-la-la, Spidey I can't see you!)

Offline PANatsFan

  • Posts: 37398
  • dogs in uncensored, nudes in gameday
Re: Nationals new 1B discussion
« Reply #35 on: December 02, 2010, 05:59:20 pm »
I want LaRoche, 2 year deal.

Offline blue911

  • Posts: 18604
Re: Nationals new 1B discussion
« Reply #36 on: December 02, 2010, 06:04:41 pm »

Offline PatsNats28

  • Posts: 8522
Re: Nationals new 1B discussion
« Reply #37 on: December 02, 2010, 06:07:27 pm »
I bet you it's Mike Morse.

Offline PANatsFan

  • Posts: 37398
  • dogs in uncensored, nudes in gameday
Re: Nationals new 1B discussion
« Reply #38 on: December 02, 2010, 06:48:02 pm »
Mark Reynolds por favor

Offline Potomac Cannons

  • Posts: 3279
Re: Nationals new 1B discussion
« Reply #39 on: December 02, 2010, 07:14:03 pm »
Mark Reynolds por favor

Wow.  That's way outside the box.  Wonder what it would take to get him?

Offline slhubic

  • Posts: 962
Re: Nationals new 1B discussion
« Reply #40 on: December 02, 2010, 07:26:20 pm »
Casey Kotchman (28)

Offline houston-nat

  • Posts: 19056
Re: Nationals new 1B discussion
« Reply #41 on: December 02, 2010, 07:26:23 pm »
Jack Cust non-tendered

Offline Potomac Cannons

  • Posts: 3279
Re: Nationals new 1B discussion
« Reply #42 on: December 02, 2010, 07:32:31 pm »
Jack Cust non-tendered

Interesting.  Hasn't played any 1B and is horrendous in the OF.  The bat fits in fairly well though.

Offline Lintyfresh85

  • Posts: 35152
  • World Champions!!!
Re: Nationals new 1B discussion
« Reply #43 on: December 02, 2010, 07:37:42 pm »
Yeah, lets go sign a guy that's worse than Dunn at offense and defense!

That sure will show 'em!


Offline PC

  • Posts: 47236
Re: Nationals new 1B discussion
« Reply #44 on: December 02, 2010, 07:39:30 pm »
Yeah, lets go sign a guy that's worse than Dunn at offense and defense!

That sure will show 'em!

But he's much cheaper.  That's not without its benefits!

:insert Scrooge McDuck jpg:

Offline Potomac Cannons

  • Posts: 3279
Re: Nationals new 1B discussion
« Reply #45 on: December 02, 2010, 07:41:13 pm »
Yeah, lets go sign a guy that's worse than Dunn at offense and defense!

That sure will show 'em!

Oh...that's right, he wasn't worse than Dunn in the OF.  Very few people have been.  He's an unknown at 1B.  Of course, mentioning someone as an intriguing option means "let's go sign him" to the blithering idiots.

Offline Lintyfresh85

  • Posts: 35152
  • World Champions!!!
Re: Nationals new 1B discussion
« Reply #46 on: December 02, 2010, 07:47:52 pm »
Oh...that's right, he wasn't worse than Dunn in the OF.  Very few people have been.  He's an unknown at 1B.  Of course, mentioning someone as an intriguing option means "let's go sign him" to the blithering idiots.

Read my lips.

freak. Off.

Offline UMDNats

  • Posts: 18070
Re: Nationals new 1B discussion
« Reply #47 on: December 02, 2010, 07:49:03 pm »
I wonder what Carlos Baerga is up to these days.

Offline NatsDad14

  • Posts: 5241
Re: Nationals new 1B discussion
« Reply #48 on: December 02, 2010, 07:49:40 pm »
I wonder what Carlos Baerga is up to these days.
If Carlos Baerga can play 1B and hit cleanup for the Nats before, just imagine what carlos Pena can do!

Offline PANatsFan

  • Posts: 37398
  • dogs in uncensored, nudes in gameday
Re: Nationals new 1B discussion
« Reply #49 on: December 02, 2010, 08:16:19 pm »
Wow.  That's way outside the box.  Wonder what it would take to get him?

It would sure please Zim.