Author Topic: Starting Rotation Discussion (5/1/2010)  (Read 4109 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline The Chief

  • Posts: 31838
    • http://www.wnff.net
Re: Nationals @ Marlins, Game 3
« Reply #50 on: May 03, 2010, 09:13:24 am »
so far

Much better ;)

Quote
Lets hope he changes that.

Agreed.

Offline Potomac Cannons

  • Posts: 3279
Re: Nationals @ Marlins, Game 3
« Reply #51 on: May 03, 2010, 09:47:00 am »
he was bad on sunday ... but against the cubs he pitched a quality start (no way getting around that) and pitched a gem against the brewers and then got the win against the mets. 

i think he'll come around.

Quality start is an assmango stat.  He walked 5, gave up 5 hits and had 1 measly K that day.  Nothing "quality" about it.  He did pitch well against Milwaukee.  He got the "win" against the Mutts pitching 5 while giving up 6 hits, 3 walks and only 2 K.  Not a good start at all and further proof that pitcher wins are a stupid stat.

1 good start in 6, that is all.

Offline PANatsFan

  • Posts: 37398
  • dogs in uncensored, nudes in gameday
Re: Starting Rotation Discussion (5/1/2010)
« Reply #52 on: May 03, 2010, 10:07:44 am »
In 6 starts, he's proved them right.... so far.

Lets hope he changes that.

Obviously I'd love to eat my words, but I don't want to pile up Patterson losses giving him infinite chances. This is a put up or shut up season, as the talent is stacking up.

Online JCA-CrystalCity

  • Global Moderator
  • ****
  • Posts: 45725
  • Platoon - not just a movie, a baseball obsession
Re: Starting Rotation Discussion (5/1/2010)
« Reply #53 on: May 03, 2010, 11:35:12 am »
Funny how before the year we were ready to lock him up long term, and now there is mention of the dreaded P word (patterson).  Anyone notice if opponents are trying to let more lefties bat against him than in prior years? 

Offline PANatsFan

  • Posts: 37398
  • dogs in uncensored, nudes in gameday
Re: Starting Rotation Discussion (5/1/2010)
« Reply #54 on: May 03, 2010, 11:44:21 am »
Funny how before the year we were ready to lock him up long term, and now there is mention of the dreaded P word (patterson).  Anyone notice if opponents are trying to let more lefties bat against him than in prior years?  

Patterson hobbled the team, every start was a guaranteed 3 inning loss. He was the Hanrahan of 2006.

For Lannan starts, the record is 3-3. 3 QS (lame stat), 2 craptastic, P word games. 3 more P word games, and you have to sit the guy. Is that an extreme viewpoint?

I'm also ridiculously impatient as there's FINALLY a major league squad still within reach of contention in May.

Offline DPMOmaha

  • Posts: 22885
Re: Starting Rotation Discussion (5/1/2010)
« Reply #55 on: May 03, 2010, 11:49:24 am »
I think Lannan's steady track record the past couple of years has earned him the opportunity to try and right the ship until the calvary arrives in June.  If he's still throwing out clunker after clunker, then yeah, I think you have to look at moving him to the pen or something.

Offline hammondsnats

  • Posts: 37394
Re: Starting Rotation Discussion (5/1/2010)
« Reply #56 on: May 03, 2010, 12:05:48 pm »
Quality start is an assmango stat.  He walked 5, gave up 5 hits and had 1 measly K that day.  Nothing "quality" about it.  He did pitch well against Milwaukee.  He got the "win" against the Mutts pitching 5 while giving up 6 hits, 3 walks and only 2 K.  Not a good start at all and further proof that pitcher wins are a stupid stat.

1 good start in 6, that is all.

to each his own ... not everyone is going to be on the same page about stats and stuff.  look @ manny acta he's a big fan of sabremetrics ... we saw how good that did him here :lmao:

at the same time ... i think john lannan can do better and he should be better than the way he is pitching.  hopefully he can turn it around soon.

Offline KnorrForYourMoney

  • Posts: 16304
  • pissy DC sports fan
Re: Starting Rotation Discussion (5/1/2010)
« Reply #57 on: May 03, 2010, 02:29:07 pm »
to each his own ... not everyone is going to be on the same page about stats and stuff.  look @ manny acta he's a big fan of sabremetrics ... we saw how good that did him here :lmao:
So is the front office that assembled the 2007 world champion Red Sox, but cherry pick all you like. :roll:

Offline Potomac Cannons

  • Posts: 3279
Re: Starting Rotation Discussion (5/1/2010)
« Reply #58 on: May 03, 2010, 02:36:21 pm »
So is the front office that assembled the 2007 world champion Red Sox, but cherry pick all you like. :roll:

The early Beane era A's were competitive with a tiny payroll due to being ahead of the curve on sabermetrics. 

Offline JMUalumni

  • Posts: 7787
Re: Starting Rotation Discussion (5/1/2010)
« Reply #59 on: May 03, 2010, 02:45:02 pm »
look @ manny acta he's a big fan of sabremetrics ... we saw how good that did him here :lmao:

Being a fan of sabermetrics and actually using them are two different things.  Acta was the former, but hardly did the latter.

Offline KnorrForYourMoney

  • Posts: 16304
  • pissy DC sports fan
Re: Starting Rotation Discussion (5/1/2010)
« Reply #60 on: May 03, 2010, 02:45:27 pm »
The early Beane era A's were competitive with a tiny payroll due to being ahead of the curve on sabermetrics. 

Yeah, that's pretty strong evidence by itself, but the Joe Morgan disciples usually shoot back with something about no championships, so I went for the slam dunk.

Online imref

  • Posts: 47551
  • NG Nattitude?
Re: Starting Rotation Discussion (5/1/2010)
« Reply #61 on: May 03, 2010, 06:11:46 pm »
Lanan seems like a decent guy, but it's becoming obvious he's a 4-5 starter at best.

Still, Strasburg, Wang, J-Zimm, Detwiller, Lanan could be a decent starting 5, with plenty of other guys to fill in during injury time.

Offline PC

  • Posts: 47236
Re: Starting Rotation Discussion (5/1/2010)
« Reply #62 on: May 03, 2010, 07:53:08 pm »
Does anyone know what's happening with Garrett Mock?

Offline Evolution33

  • Posts: 5093
    • Blown Save, Win
Re: Starting Rotation Discussion (5/1/2010)
« Reply #63 on: May 03, 2010, 08:02:35 pm »
Yeah, that's pretty strong evidence by itself, but the Joe Morgan disciples usually shoot back with something about no championships, so I went for the slam dunk.

I don't think you can go all one way or another and understand everything. The red sox still needed Dave Roberts to win the world series. All theories have value the smartest people are able to use all information and their disposal and not buy in too hard to any one theory.

Offline Potomac Cannons

  • Posts: 3279
Re: Starting Rotation Discussion (5/1/2010)
« Reply #64 on: May 03, 2010, 08:15:10 pm »
I don't think you can go all one way or another and understand everything. The red sox still needed Dave Roberts to win the world series. All theories have value the smartest people are able to use all information and their disposal and not buy in too hard to any one theory.

Exactly.  In player development/evaluation, you identify with sabermetrics the kind of things you want.  You then use the eye test to draft those you think will best fit that kind of team, identify which players aren't living up to the expected level of play and attempt to define why that is happening, and have a starting point for identifying who you may want to pick up/trade for when the situation arises.

In a case like Lannan you ride the unexpected success as long as you can while still getting out before it's too late.  He's smart/savvy enough to carve out a pretty lengthy career.  He seems like the kind of guy who will find a way to stick, even if it's just as a lefty specialist in the pen, for far longer than his peripheral stats and talent would tend to predict.  Whether he's in Syracuse, the bullpen, or some other team, I'm sure he'll be around for quite a while.

Offline Vega

  • Posts: 5516
  • Party’s Over
Re: Starting Rotation Discussion (5/1/2010)
« Reply #65 on: May 03, 2010, 11:26:09 pm »
What's Shairon Martis doing these days?

Offline hammondsnats

  • Posts: 37394
Re: Starting Rotation Discussion (5/1/2010)
« Reply #66 on: May 03, 2010, 11:33:02 pm »
What's Shairon Martis doing these days?

struggling in AAA, but pitched decent in tonight's outing.

Offline EdStroud

  • Posts: 10139
Re: Starting Rotation Discussion (5/1/2010)
« Reply #67 on: May 03, 2010, 11:39:58 pm »
What's Shairon Martis doing these days?
1-2 with a 6.20ERA in 5 starts for 'Cuse.  Did pick up his first win tonite (5/3/2010) over Columbus.

Offline nats2playoffs

  • Posts: 23935
Re: Starting Rotation Discussion (5/1/2010)
« Reply #68 on: May 04, 2010, 12:24:38 am »
Always sucks against the Marlins/Phillies.  He has to stop that crap if he wants to be on this team for the long haul.

We play too many games against the Marlins/Phillies to have a SP who cannot do the job.  
I see Lannan headed to the bullpen.  
(Or to become an actor in a revival of silent films.)



A #5 starter stinks for most teams; they hope for some wins, or to stay in those games with their own bats.  Lannan walks too many guys, and strikes out few.  

The Nationals are near the bottom of MLB in strikeouts thrown by their pitchers.  Can't contend that way.

Offline Potomac Cannons

  • Posts: 3279
Re: Starting Rotation Discussion (5/1/2010)
« Reply #69 on: May 04, 2010, 01:16:35 am »
What's Shairon Martis doing these days?

Sucking out loud?

Offline UMDNats

  • Posts: 18070
Re: Starting Rotation Discussion (5/1/2010)
« Reply #70 on: May 04, 2010, 04:35:22 pm »
About Lannan, from Kilgore:

Quote
John Lannan will miss his next start because of a physical problem.

Quote
No word on who replaces Lannan for now in the #Nats rotation.

Offline blue911

  • Posts: 18597
Re: Starting Rotation Discussion (5/1/2010)
« Reply #71 on: May 04, 2010, 04:38:19 pm »
^ Probably found Jimmy Hoffa in his elbow.

Offline CJames0569

  • Posts: 1698
Re: Starting Rotation Discussion (5/1/2010)
« Reply #72 on: May 04, 2010, 04:41:05 pm »
About Lannan, from Kilgore:


Seriously? Jeez, hopefully this isn't one where he went to the training staff about the problem and they sent him out to pitch anyways. So who do we bring up?

Offline DPMOmaha

  • Posts: 22885
Re: Starting Rotation Discussion (5/1/2010)
« Reply #73 on: May 04, 2010, 04:42:42 pm »
Awesome.

Offline UMDNats

  • Posts: 18070
Re: Starting Rotation Discussion (5/1/2010)
« Reply #74 on: May 04, 2010, 04:44:05 pm »
Quote
washingnats
The doctors found swelling in John Lannan's left elbow, but no structural damage. #Nats