Not that it really matters, but I can't decide how the rankings should go. Technically everyone with a 1-0 record has a better win % than the current top 5, but it seems ridiculous to rank them 1st compared to guys who've started 4, 6, or 10 games. Same thoughts apply to a lesser extent for the guys who are 1-3, 1-4 vs the guys who are 0-1.