So who's up to bat next for the game thread? (2010)

[Lintyfresh85]

I'm done making threads, for the year.

I can't buy a win to save my life.

[PANatsFan]

Few ways to respond without setting myself up further

However, give me my darn win!

Sorry for the tone but I was taking flak yesterday.

[houston-nat]

I used to live in Detroit. I'll do Wednesday's (Livan v Verlander).

[The Chief]

I'm done making threads, for the year.

I can't buy a win to save my life.

You've got a win, and it wasn't even a Strasburg start, so you're still doing better than me (according to GMU anyway )

Sorry for the tone but I was taking flak yesterday.

No worries.  I just didn't have anything to add to the updated scores.

[The Chief]

So who's taking a chance on Lannan tonight?

[DPMOmaha]

So who's taking a chance on Lannan tonight?

With an off day, I think most of us are going to hold off until tomorrow.

[EdStroud]

With an off day, I think most of us are going to hold off until tomorrow.

You beat me to it.  OK, so I'm stepping in tonight only and after tonight my record will be 0-0.  Still undefeated!!!

[The Chief]

Ha, oops

[houston-nat]

Just drafted a post for tomorrow's gameday thread. It's slightly on the clinically insane side though. Might ditch it. It's a series of MS Paint files illustrating the scandalous decline and fall of Detroit's previous mayor...

[PANatsFan]

Just drafted a post for tomorrow's gameday thread. It's slightly on the clinically insane side though. Might ditch it. It's a series of MS Paint files illustrating the scandalous decline and fall of Detroit's previous mayor...

I spent a ton of time on my punny icon post, no one cared, and the team lost. I made 2 graphics in 2 minutes for my strasburg game, and the team won.

[DPMOmaha]

I think Storen beat ya to the punch...

[houston-nat]

I think Storen beat ya to the punch...

Sorry, I meant Wednesday

[houston-nat]

Sorry, I meant Wednesday

Wow, I came so close to forgetting about this

[The Chief]

5-1   DPMOmaha
7-3   hammondsnats
3-3   Roarin Storen
2-1   ASSCLOWN
2-2   cmdterps44
1-0   nats2playoffs
1-0   imref
1-0   JMUAlumni
1-0   Nat of the Living Dead
1-0   OldChelsea
1-1   Evolution33
1-1   houston-nat
1-2   CJames0569
1-2   The Chief
1-3   PANatsFan
1-4   Lintyfresh85
1-4   GMUNat
0-1   d_mc_nabb
0-1   Nathan
0-1   ronnynat
0-1   spidernat
0-1   UMDNats
0-2   KnorrForYourMoney

[The Chief]

Not that it really matters, but I can't decide how the rankings should go.  Technically everyone with a 1-0 record has a better win % than the current top 5, but it seems ridiculous to rank them 1st compared to guys who've started 4, 6, or 10 games.  Same thoughts apply to a lesser extent for the guys who are 1-3, 1-4 vs the guys who are 0-1.

[blue911]

Not that it really matters, but I can't decide how the rankings should go.  Technically everyone with a 1-0 record has a better win % than the current top 5, but it seems ridiculous to rank them 1st compared to guys who've started 4, 6, or 10 games.  Same thoughts apply to a lesser extent for the guys who are 1-3, 1-4 vs the guys who are 0-1.

Bribes, take bribes for better ratings

[Minty Fresh]

Not that it really matters, but I can't decide how the rankings should go.  Technically everyone with a 1-0 record has a better win % than the current top 5, but it seems ridiculous to rank them 1st compared to guys who've started 4, 6, or 10 games.  Same thoughts apply to a lesser extent for the guys who are 1-3, 1-4 vs the guys who are 0-1.

Minimum three starts to qualify?

I want a shot eventually....

[The Chief]

I could line them up by ERA

[Nathan]

I could line them up by ERA

Wow, you must have a lot of time on your hands

I need another start to try to claw my way into the rotation.

[The Chief]

Wow, you must have a lot of time on your hands

I need another start to try to claw my way into the rotation.

Sometimes I have a ton, other times I have none at all.  I'm the Morgan/Guzman of time management

[PANatsFan]

Sometimes I have a ton, other times I have none at all.  I'm the Morgan/Guzman of time management

So I guess I'm Mike Bacsik or Luis Matos.

[tomterp]

Not that it really matters, but I can't decide how the rankings should go.  Technically everyone with a 1-0 record has a better win % than the current top 5, but it seems ridiculous to rank them 1st compared to guys who've started 4, 6, or 10 games.  Same thoughts apply to a lesser extent for the guys who are 1-3, 1-4 vs the guys who are 0-1.

Give 'em plus / minus ratings.  2 points for a win, 1 for extra-inning win, -1 extra inning loss, -2 ordinary loss.   

[Minty Fresh]

Give 'em plus / minus ratings.  2 points for a win, 1 for extra-inning win, -1 extra inning loss, -2 ordinary loss.   

Nah.  It should be completely subjective.  Rank them by how much he likes each poster.

[The Chief]

5-1   DPMOmaha
7-3   hammondsnats
3-3   Roarin Storen
2-1   ASSCLOWN
2-2   cmdterps44
1-0   nats2playoffs
1-0   imref
1-0   JMUAlumni
1-0   Nat of the Living Dead
1-0   OldChelsea
1-1   Evolution33
1-2   CJames0569
1-2   houston-nat
1-2   The Chief
1-3   PANatsFan
1-4   Lintyfresh85
1-4   GMUNat
0-1   d_mc_nabb
0-1   Nathan
0-1   ronnynat
0-1   spidernat
0-1   UMDNats
0-2   KnorrForYourMoney

[The Chief]

Whaddya know, this is starting to look just like the Nats rotation - a handful of good pitchers and then a bunch of scrubs