Author Topic: The "Former Nat Watch" Thread (2009)  (Read 17346 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline PANatsFan

  • Posts: 37398
  • dogs in uncensored, nudes in gameday
The "Former Nat Watch" Thread (2009)
« Reply #225 on: May 13, 2009, 07:37:28 pm »
wait, seriously?

I don't watch local news.

*doh*

Would I lie - also with few exceptions (like KDKA in Pittsburgh) W call letters are east of the Mississippi and K is west (I'm a radio nerd).

Offline ronnynat

  • Posts: 23269
The "Former Nat Watch" Thread (2009)
« Reply #226 on: May 16, 2009, 12:12:04 am »
Rangers To Sign Mike Hinckley
from MLB Trade Rumors by Drew Silva

According to T.R. Sullivan of MLB.com, the Rangers are close to inking left-hander Mike Hinckley to a minor league contract. 
The 26-year-old opted for free agency after he was designated for assignment by the Nationals last week.  He had a 1.93 ERA and 1.29 WHIP in two seasons with Washington, but displayed major control problems out of the gate this year.  The Rangers will add him to their Triple-A Oklahoma City roster.

Offline KnorrForYourMoney

  • Posts: 16304
  • pissy DC sports fan
The "Former Nat Watch" Thread (2009)
« Reply #227 on: May 16, 2009, 12:25:27 am »
Would I lie - also with few exceptions (like KDKA in Pittsburgh) W call letters are east of the Mississippi and K is west (I'm a radio nerd).
You don't have to be a radio nerd to know that. :lol:

Offline PANatsFan

  • Posts: 37398
  • dogs in uncensored, nudes in gameday
The "Former Nat Watch" Thread (2009)
« Reply #228 on: May 17, 2009, 09:39:31 am »
You don't have to be a radio nerd to know that. :lol:

Har Har - about the exceptions like WRC in DC or KDKA in Pittsburgh.

Offline houston-nat

  • Posts: 19056
The "Former Nat Watch" Thread (2009)
« Reply #229 on: May 18, 2009, 11:58:28 am »
Cross-posting this in two threads: the Marlins have designated John Koronka for assignment and MLBTR speculates that they will be filling his roster spot with potential callup Brian Sanches.

Offline hammondsnats

  • Posts: 37394
The "Former Nat Watch" Thread (2009)
« Reply #230 on: May 19, 2009, 01:13:55 pm »
Bill Bray = Tommy John surgery = out at least 10-12 months.

guy can never stay healthy

Offline hammondsnats

  • Posts: 37394
The "Former Nat Watch" Thread (2009)
« Reply #231 on: May 19, 2009, 02:56:39 pm »
what's alex escobar doing these days?

Offline hammondsnats

  • Posts: 37394
The "Former Nat Watch" Thread (2009)
« Reply #232 on: May 19, 2009, 05:53:29 pm »
Chris Schroder called up by the A's.  A 2-1 record w/ a 2.37 ERA in 19 innings for A's AAA club.

Yeah we couldn't use him :(

Offline JCA-CrystalCity

  • Global Moderator
  • ****
  • Posts: 45628
  • Platoon - not just a movie, a baseball obsession
The "Former Nat Watch" Thread (2009)
« Reply #233 on: May 19, 2009, 06:03:00 pm »
Chris Schroder called up by the A's.  A 2-1 record w/ a 2.37 ERA in 19 innings for A's AAA club.

Yeah we couldn't use him :(

Last year I thought he was completely misused.  A huge mistake to drum him out of the organization. I wonder what the thinking was.  He had been successful in 2007. 

The "Former Nat Watch" Thread (2009)
« Reply #234 on: May 19, 2009, 06:13:43 pm »
what's alex escobar doing these days?

Still a Free Agent.

Offline houston-nat

  • Posts: 19056
The "Former Nat Watch" Thread (2009)
« Reply #235 on: May 20, 2009, 06:45:48 pm »
Jon Heyman has an update on the silliness in New York:
• Jerry Manuel calling Ryan Church "the guy" was reminiscent of John McCain calling Barack Obama "that guy." Both men denied there's a rift after Manuel was so angered by Church missing third base in the Mets' heartbreaking 3-2 defeat Monday in L.A. But I'd have to say, I don't believe Manuel's in love.

Offline The Chief

  • Posts: 31838
    • http://www.wnff.net
The "Former Nat Watch" Thread (2009)
« Reply #236 on: May 20, 2009, 07:24:00 pm »
Well if you believe the Mets fanbase, there's been a racial divide in that clubhouse for years.  Given Church's reputation for being a tad on the naive side, I can't imagine he fits in very well.

Offline mikehughes

  • Posts: 1375
The "Former Nat Watch" Thread (2009)
« Reply #237 on: May 25, 2009, 12:37:09 am »

Offline sportsfan882

  • Posts: 93631
The "Former Nat Watch" Thread (2009)
« Reply #238 on: May 31, 2009, 01:28:23 pm »
Tim "Vindicator" Redding has been less than stellar for the Mutts since coming off the DL.

3 Starts: 14.2 IP 18 H 15 R 15 ER 2 HR 10 BB 10 K (0-2, 9.20 ERA, 1.91 WHIP).

and they are paying him $2,250,000 :rofl:

Offline blue911

  • Posts: 18596
The "Former Nat Watch" Thread (2009)
« Reply #239 on: May 31, 2009, 01:56:46 pm »
Tim "Vindicator" Redding has been less than stellar for the Mutts since coming off the DL.

3 Starts: 14.2 IP 18 H 15 R 15 ER 2 HR 10 BB 10 K (0-2, 9.20 ERA, 1.91 WHIP).

and they are paying him $2,250,000 :rofl:

Look at his 1st inning numbers. The Nats would have done well to let him compete with Joel for the closers job.

Offline blue911

  • Posts: 18596
The "Former Nat Watch" Thread (2009)
« Reply #240 on: June 01, 2009, 12:30:57 pm »
The Nats have won less than 35% of their games since the trade. Maybe he should be our next manager  :D

Offline Minty Fresh

  • Posts: 20386
  • BOOM!
The "Former Nat Watch" Thread (2009)
« Reply #241 on: June 01, 2009, 12:32:49 pm »
The Nats have won less than 35% of their games since the trade. Maybe he should be our next manager  :D

:clap: :clap: :clap:

I hear he calls a GREAT game.  :D

Though that doesn't matter - so I've heard.     :?

Offline ronnynat

  • Posts: 23269
The "Former Nat Watch" Thread (2009)
« Reply #242 on: June 01, 2009, 12:34:24 pm »
I hear he calls a GREAT game.  :D

Where? In New York? I don't think he ever called a game here. He was pretty good at blocking pitches in the dirt, though.

Offline The Chief

  • Posts: 31838
    • http://www.wnff.net
The "Former Nat Watch" Thread (2009)
« Reply #243 on: June 01, 2009, 12:47:05 pm »
:clap: :clap: :clap:

I hear he calls a GREAT game.  :D

Though that doesn't matter - so I've heard.     :?

You are seriously becoming sportsfan lite.  I think that one night "just for fun" got you hooked :lol:

Offline blue911

  • Posts: 18596
The "Former Nat Watch" Thread (2009)
« Reply #244 on: June 01, 2009, 12:59:36 pm »
Chief, can you change the title to " The Curse of Brian Schneider" ?  :icon_mrgreen:

Offline The Chief

  • Posts: 31838
    • http://www.wnff.net
The "Former Nat Watch" Thread (2009)
« Reply #245 on: June 01, 2009, 01:00:50 pm »
Chief, can you change the title to " The Curse of Brian Schneider" ?  :icon_mrgreen:

You're the thread creator, you should be able to do it yourself.  Just modify the title in the first post.

I'd do it but I don't feel like having any more riots and cries of oppression and over-moderation on my hands ;)

Offline blue911

  • Posts: 18596
The "Former Nat Watch" Thread (2009)
« Reply #246 on: June 01, 2009, 01:04:11 pm »
You're the thread creator, you should be able to do it yourself.  Just modify the title in the first post.

I'd do it but I don't feel like having any more riots and cries of oppression and over-moderation on my hands ;)

I didn't want to to all that typing myself.

Offline The Chief

  • Posts: 31838
    • http://www.wnff.net
The "Former Nat Watch" Thread (2009)
« Reply #247 on: June 01, 2009, 01:06:23 pm »
I didn't want to to all that typing myself.

I can't type, I'm just a glowing red eye.  Phil Wood does my typing for me.

Offline shoeshineboy

  • Posts: 7970
  • Walks Kill!! Walks Kill! Walks Kill!!!!
The "Former Nat Watch" Thread (2009)
« Reply #248 on: June 01, 2009, 01:22:15 pm »
The Nats have won less than 35% of their games since the trade. Maybe he should be our next manager  :D

That means they have lost 35% of their games since they traded Church. Perhaps that's the reason. Or maybe it's that Milledge is a cancer.

Perhaps it is all the above, along with the fact that the organization did a piss poor job of acquiring talent, and the manager has no idea how to manage a bullpen, hold players accountable, or put people in positions to succeed.

Damn that Brian Schneider for causing all that trouble. And he's a racist to boot.

Offline blue911

  • Posts: 18596
The "Former Nat Watch" Thread (2009)
« Reply #249 on: June 01, 2009, 01:26:04 pm »
That means they have lost 35% of their games since they traded Church. Perhaps that's the reason. Or maybe it's that Milledge is a cancer.

Perhaps it is all the above, along with the fact that the organization did a piss poor job of acquiring talent, and the manager has no idea how to manage a bullpen, hold players accountable, or put people in positions to succeed.

Damn that Brian Schneider for causing all that trouble. And he's a racist to boot.

No,they've lost the same amount of games since they traded Church.  ;)