0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
They have come up so fast. Kia too. I tried to convince my dad to look into the Tucson or Sportage SUVs or even a Subaru Forrester, but instead he goes out yesterday and buys a CR-V. By trading in his 2006 CR-V. Which he bought in 2006 by trading in his 2001 CR-V. 15 years of CR-Vs
The CRV is a steaming pile of underpowered crap. I test drove an '07 and it sucked, and a 2010 and it was better but still sucked, and they cost new what my 5 cost new. Good grief. I do like the new Odyssey, the Ridgeline, the Fit, and the new hybrid sports car.
try the genesis- supposedly it matches up pretty nicely to a BMW 5 series.
Cars are normally underpowered to achieve better fuel economy. In such cars, a manual transmission is going to outperform automatics to a significant degree, but most buyers these days are too trifling to confront the reality that, on occasion, they may have to exercise their left calf in syncronization with their right arm, a daunting prospect.
The genesis was supposedly designed to basically be a 528. I'm not saying it is, but the specs are very similar and the cabin of the genesis is comparable.
I would be more interested in road tests, as opposed to cabin niceties.
For the price, it is a hot, hot car.
Driving ImpressionsTuned more toward the luxury end of the spectrum, the Genesis' suspension offers a soft ride with respectable handling. The latter is surprisingly neutral -- a run through the slalom showed the Genesis to be a little soft and slow, but impressively obedient. The electrohydraulic steering assist leaves the rack-and-pinion steering feeling more isolated from the tires than we'd prefer, but the steering itself is still precise and appropriate, given the scale and mission of the car. Nobody would ever mistake the Genesis for a BMW when it comes to steering, but Infiniti or Lexus owners will find it familiar.While a stopping distance of 124 feet from 60 mph isn't what we'd call world-class, it's still pretty good for a 4,000-pound sedan wearing all-season tires.
Edmunds gave the 2009 a fairly good review - as you said, quite a value. Impressive horsepower and reasonable economy for that much power, but the achilles heel - handling, which is where BMW excels.Here's their comment on what it's like to actually drive on the road:
I have a base level stick, but it has most of the add-ons of the next level up so I'm not really missing anything. I do miss better tires, though. Gotta be really easy on the gas through any kind of turn if you want to maintain full contact. Of course there are times I don't mind so much. Ass-sliding through a turn is fun and makes people think you're crazy
You can do some research and get a reasonable bargain on tires. I replaced the factory crapass tires on my highlander with a Firestone imprint (Widetrack Baja), and they are killer tires, they were 150 each.
It's a lease so it's not like I'm gonna sink money into it. Just gotta make sure it gets back to the dealer in one piece Before anyone tells me what a waste of money leases are, just know that I was stuck between a rock and a hard place. Old clunker needed $1200/work to pass inspection (which was already 4 months out of date) and I needed to get back on the road pronto. I like what I got - also got a really fantastic deal on it - but I plan on spending a lot more time looking come 2012 (assuming we don't all die)
I traded it in for $1000 towards the lease. It seriously wasn't worth even half of that
Ninja delete!!!