Author Topic: Bullpen Discussion  (Read 9366 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline KnorrForYourMoney

  • Posts: 16304
  • pissy DC sports fan
Re: Bullpen Discussion
« Reply #175 on: August 30, 2009, 03:56:34 pm »
You misspelled two words, and you mis-entered an emoticon. :rofl:

Offline PatsNats28

  • Posts: 8522
Re: Bullpen Discussion
« Reply #176 on: August 30, 2009, 03:57:21 pm »
:lmao: because I misspell one word everyone assumes I was toasted

I thought that SoxNats knew who I was referring too.

Meh, your post was right after mine, it was a fair assumption.

Offline Busta Mimes

  • Posts: 233
  • I'll Ram the hell out of you
Re: Bullpen Discussion
« Reply #177 on: August 31, 2009, 12:27:31 am »
Is it that unrealistic to hope that we can see pretty much a whole new bullpen next year? We will not win with any bullpen even closely resembling 2009's version.

How can anyone say it's unrealistic?  We've gotten a new bullpen from the beginning of this season until now.  Just think what our new GM will do this off-season.

Offline PANatsFan

  • Posts: 37398
  • dogs in uncensored, nudes in gameday
Re: Bullpen Discussion
« Reply #178 on: August 31, 2009, 12:31:23 am »
How can anyone say it's unrealistic?  We've gotten a new bullpen from the beginning of this season until now.  Just think what our new GM will do this off-season.

I'll go with this. Rizzo has really turned lead into gold. He traded everyone that really needed to go (Belliard, Hanrahan, Milledge, Beimel, Johnson, Hernandez). He held onto the guys with a spark (Mac, Clippard, Willie). It'll be a fun winter.

Offline The Chief

  • Posts: 31838
    • http://www.wnff.net
Re: Bullpen Discussion
« Reply #179 on: August 31, 2009, 08:19:57 am »
You forgot Kearns.

Offline tomterp

  • Global Moderator
  • ****
  • Posts: 33885
  • Hell yes!
Re: Bullpen Discussion
« Reply #180 on: August 31, 2009, 08:38:27 am »
You forgot Kearns.

untradeable by anyone.

Offline The Chief

  • Posts: 31838
    • http://www.wnff.net
Re: Bullpen Discussion
« Reply #181 on: August 31, 2009, 08:51:47 am »
untradeable by anyone.

Doesn't change the fact that he forgot him.  Besides, wasn't there a rumor that someone had put in a waiver claim on Kearns before he was moved to the DL?

Offline blue911

  • Posts: 18597
Re: Bullpen Discussion
« Reply #182 on: August 31, 2009, 09:38:16 am »
Has anybody else looked at the splits on Clippard?


Offline The Chief

  • Posts: 31838
    • http://www.wnff.net
Re: Bullpen Discussion
« Reply #183 on: August 31, 2009, 09:41:55 am »
Has anybody else looked at the splits on Clippard?

At what specifically?

Offline blue911

  • Posts: 18597
Re: Bullpen Discussion
« Reply #184 on: August 31, 2009, 09:48:21 am »
At what specifically?

He's killing lefties. I mean KILLING lefties. But is less than average against righties. Trevor Hoffman at his best never put up those kind of numbers against left handed batters.

http://www.baseball-reference.com/players/split.cgi?n1=clippty01&year=2009&t=p

Offline PatsNats28

  • Posts: 8522
Re: Bullpen Discussion
« Reply #185 on: August 31, 2009, 10:02:20 am »
Doesn't change the fact that he forgot him.  Besides, wasn't there a rumor that someone had put in a waiver claim on Kearns before he was moved to the DL?

Yeah, but it was gonna be like that situation with the Reds where they'd sue us once they found out he was injured. Rizzo doesn't want to get Bowden's rep.

Offline The Chief

  • Posts: 31838
    • http://www.wnff.net
Re: Bullpen Discussion
« Reply #186 on: August 31, 2009, 10:23:04 am »
Yeah, but it was gonna be like that situation with the Reds where they'd sue us once they found out he was injured. Rizzo doesn't want to get Bowden's rep.

I wasn't suggesting that, just pointing out that somebody was interested in Kearns.  He would likely have been moved if not for the injury, even if it was just a salary dump.

He's killing lefties. I mean KILLING lefties. But is less than average against righties. Trevor Hoffman at his best never put up those kind of numbers against left handed batters.

http://www.baseball-reference.com/players/split.cgi?n1=clippty01&year=2009&t=p

Already looked at the splits, assumed that's what you meant but wasn't sure.  Let's see him do it consistently next season before we proclaim him a lock for a spot in the pen.  What was it Dave B used to call guys?  Garbage time all-stars?

Offline blue911

  • Posts: 18597
Re: Bullpen Discussion
« Reply #187 on: August 31, 2009, 10:36:23 am »
I wasn't suggesting that, just pointing out that somebody was interested in Kearns.  He would likely have been moved if not for the injury, even if it was just a salary dump.

Already looked at the splits, assumed that's what you meant but wasn't sure.  Let's see him do it consistently next season before we proclaim him a lock for a spot in the pen.  What was it Dave B used to call guys?  Garbage time all-stars?

I thought you'd see the same thing. Against right handed batters, he has put up worse numbers than Jason Bergmann,Jesus Colome,Kip Wells, & Saul Rivera. All popular punching bags.

I hope the Nationals go out and get at least three vets for the bullpen, because I have little faith in any pitcher outside of Burnett.

Offline PANatsFan

  • Posts: 37398
  • dogs in uncensored, nudes in gameday
Re: Bullpen Discussion
« Reply #188 on: August 31, 2009, 10:40:33 am »
Doesn't change the fact that he forgot him.  Besides, wasn't there a rumor that someone had put in a waiver claim on Kearns before he was moved to the DL?

Rubbing it in huh ;)

I think that was a rebuilding credibility move. Bowden would have moved a guy that was hurt on waivers no question. Rizzo thought he might be done, so he pulled him back and then they DL'ed him. That's my unsubstantiated theory.

Offline PANatsFan

  • Posts: 37398
  • dogs in uncensored, nudes in gameday
Re: Bullpen Discussion
« Reply #189 on: August 31, 2009, 10:41:00 am »
I thought you'd see the same thing. Against right handed batters, he has put up worse numbers than Jason Bergmann,Jesus Colome,Kip Wells, & Saul Rivera. All popular punching bags.

I hope the Nationals go out and get at least three vets for the bullpen, because I have little faith in any pitcher outside of Burnett.

You think Burnett > Klej?

Offline JCA-CrystalCity

  • Global Moderator
  • ****
  • Posts: 45735
  • Platoon - not just a movie, a baseball obsession
Re: Bullpen Discussion
« Reply #190 on: August 31, 2009, 10:42:04 am »
He's killing lefties. I mean KILLING lefties. But is less than average against righties. Trevor Hoffman at his best never put up those kind of numbers against left handed batters.

http://www.baseball-reference.com/players/split.cgi?n1=clippty01&year=2009&t=p

Stats geek.  I love reverse splits.

Offline blue911

  • Posts: 18597
Re: Bullpen Discussion
« Reply #191 on: August 31, 2009, 10:43:48 am »
Stats geek.  I love reverse splits.

For a pitcher,all reverse splits mean is he throws a change up.

Offline blue911

  • Posts: 18597
Re: Bullpen Discussion
« Reply #192 on: August 31, 2009, 10:44:58 am »
You think Burnett > Klej?

I think he's more reliable. I hate the idea of counting on MacDougal to be the closer for next season.

Offline JCA-CrystalCity

  • Global Moderator
  • ****
  • Posts: 45735
  • Platoon - not just a movie, a baseball obsession
Re: Bullpen Discussion
« Reply #193 on: August 31, 2009, 10:48:54 am »
For a pitcher,all reverse splits mean is he throws a change up.

Well, an OPS against < .400 for lefties is something to love.  It may be a short fling kind of love, but it is something.  The .818 for righties, not so much.  Maybe it is his glasses?

Offline KnorrForYourMoney

  • Posts: 16304
  • pissy DC sports fan
Re: Bullpen Discussion
« Reply #194 on: August 31, 2009, 10:55:58 am »
You think Burnett > Klej?
Klej has zero control and only one reliable pitch.  He's been incredibly lucky this season.

Offline blue911

  • Posts: 18597
Re: Bullpen Discussion
« Reply #195 on: August 31, 2009, 11:04:03 am »
Well, an OPS against < .400 for lefties is something to love.  It may be a short fling kind of love, but it is something.  The .818 for righties, not so much. Maybe it is his glasses?

Probably. They should let him wear a pyramid shaped hat.




Offline JMUalumni

  • Posts: 7787
Re: Bullpen Discussion
« Reply #196 on: August 31, 2009, 11:29:43 am »
I've never really liked Bergmann, but I do think that he could be a serviceable part of our bullpen next year if he is used properly.  The stat that really stands out to me is out of 35 runners he has inherited this season, only 4 or 11% of them have scored (league average is 31%).  Typically, IR% doesn't mean much with a sample size under 20 IR (see Wells, Kip), but 35 seems to be an adequate sample (10 IS - 54 IR career).  What I don't want to see is Bergmann being used in late game, high leverage situations.

Offline PANatsFan

  • Posts: 37398
  • dogs in uncensored, nudes in gameday
Re: Bullpen Discussion
« Reply #197 on: August 31, 2009, 11:32:49 am »
I think he's more reliable. I hate the idea of counting on MacDougal to be the closer for next season.

Like I've been saying, with his salary next season, he'll hold the fort down till Storen is ready.

Offline blue911

  • Posts: 18597
Re: Bullpen Discussion
« Reply #198 on: August 31, 2009, 11:46:46 am »
Like I've been saying, with his salary next season, he'll hold the fort down till Storen is ready.

Get Rafael Soriano and Storen can spend a season or two as a set up guy. Soriano is money and he'll weaken the Braves. Hell get Mike Gonzalez while your at it.

Offline KnorrForYourMoney

  • Posts: 16304
  • pissy DC sports fan
Re: Bullpen Discussion
« Reply #199 on: August 31, 2009, 12:08:11 pm »
Get Rafael Soriano and Storen can spend a season or two as a set up guy. Soriano is money and he'll weaken the Braves. Hell get Mike Gonzalez while your at it.
Agreed.