PS3 also upconverts regular DVDs so they look nicer on HDTVs, 360 doesn't. Plus, with the old model anyway, the PS3 was much quieter than the 360, which sounded like a jet taking off half the time. I don't know what it's like now though, with the slim model that is supposed to be quieter.
You think the PS3 is better for games and the 360 is better as a media center?
I had heard that about upconverting. Supposedly the PS3 does a pretty bangup job. It seems odd that the 360 doesn't upconvert - surely the processing power is there for it. Agreed on the noise though. I borrowed an old school 360 once and it was annoyingly noisy even compared to my PC (which was much noisier at the time than the one I've got now). The slims are supposed to be better, but I have no idea how much.
I don't personally have an opinion about which is better for what, I just have a collection of hearsay and observations. If I were buying a console, it'd prob be a 360 just because it seems to be more popular. Stands to reason that means more people to play with and more games, apps, cool custom programs/uses, etc. Better used games market too, I would guess (though if you have Gamefly I suppose that's irrelevant).
I guess for me it boils down to not playing online that much. PC's are catching up in that regard, and some games (like StarCraft 2) have a really fantastic online experience, but by and large I think consoles are the clear leaders in that department. I'm more about the single-player experience, in which case it's usually cheaper and easier (M&KB) to play on a desktop.
I'm weird though. Hell, I was playing X-COM this morning. Do you know how f***ing old that game is?
