Author Topic: MLB-Watching (2009)  (Read 45568 times)

0 Members and 5 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline NatsAddict

  • Posts: 4099
Re: MLB-Watching (2009)
« Reply #600 on: October 04, 2009, 10:52:23 pm »
I'm rooting for Detroit over the twins for one reason: Miguel Cabrera.

Offline sportsfan882

  • Posts: 93631
Re: MLB-Watching (2009)
« Reply #601 on: October 05, 2009, 12:22:46 pm »
Quote
Police in suburban Detroit say Miguel Cabrera and his wife got into a fight at their home over the weekend after the Tigers slugger came home drunk around 5 a.m.

Birmingham Police Chief Richard Patterson said Monday that Cabrera's wife called 911 at 6 a.m. Saturday, requesting police assistance. Miguel Cabrera opened the door for officers.

Patterson says the Cabreras had been fighting and each had marks on their faces as a result.

The chief says Rosangel Cabrera asked that her husband leave the house, so officers took him to the police station, where he was picked up by Tigers general manager Dave Dombrowski around 7:30 a.m.[/quote[

Offline Ali the Baseball Cat

  • Posts: 17944
  • babble on
Re: MLB-Watching (2009)
« Reply #602 on: October 06, 2009, 11:46:44 am »
Yeah, but they play in a dome, which is lame.

I'm rooting for the Twins because they're a small market team, and it's fun to root for small market teams.

Offline DPMOmaha

  • Posts: 22885
Re: MLB-Watching (2009)
« Reply #603 on: October 06, 2009, 11:51:32 am »
Not for much longer.  Their new park looks awesome, but it'll be bone chilling in April and October...

Offline blue911

  • Posts: 18595
Re: MLB-Watching (2009)
« Reply #604 on: October 06, 2009, 11:52:27 am »
Not for much longer.  Their new park looks awesome, but it'll be bone chilling in April and October...

And mosquitoes the size of your foot the rest of the season.

Offline blue911

  • Posts: 18595
Re: MLB-Watching (2009)
« Reply #605 on: October 06, 2009, 04:10:09 pm »
Why is the game starting at 5pm EDT?

Offline NatsAddict

  • Posts: 4099
Re: MLB-Watching (2009)
« Reply #606 on: October 06, 2009, 04:19:34 pm »
Why is the game starting at 5pm EDT?

Because Miguel will be drunk by 9:00 pm

Offline blue911

  • Posts: 18595
Re: MLB-Watching (2009)
« Reply #607 on: October 06, 2009, 04:25:10 pm »
Because Miguel will be drunk by 9:00 pm

Ah playing by the Mickey Mantle rules.

Offline houston-nat

  • Posts: 19056
Re: MLB-Watching (2009)
« Reply #608 on: October 06, 2009, 08:47:20 pm »
Brandon Inge makes himself useful!

Online JCA-CrystalCity

  • Global Moderator
  • ****
  • Posts: 45487
  • Platoon - not just a movie, a baseball obsession
Re: MLB-Watching (2009)
« Reply #609 on: October 06, 2009, 09:59:40 pm »
I missed first in my AL roto league by .0004 on WHIP.  It literally came down to Darren Oliver giving up a hit in his last inning.

Our league stayed open for tonight because the stats count for the regular season.  I had several ways to get back into a tie.  Gomez steal or homer, a win by Rodney or Seay, would be owrht a half point each, and if the relievers had a WHIP < 1, I had a point.  For one batter, Rodney's first out, I had the tie.  After that, not so much. 

Offline dirtynat

  • Posts: 68
Re: MLB-Watching (2009)
« Reply #610 on: October 09, 2009, 09:03:46 pm »
Twins baby. 

Online imref

  • Posts: 47364
  • NG Nattitude?
Re: MLB-Watching (2009)
« Reply #611 on: October 09, 2009, 09:06:10 pm »
Am I the only one looking at the Twins lineup and wondering how the heck this team made the playoffs?  Outside of Mauer who is there to be afraid of?

It just tells you that defense and pitching are the key to success in this league. 

Offline KnorrForYourMoney

  • Posts: 16304
  • pissy DC sports fan
Re: MLB-Watching (2009)
« Reply #612 on: October 09, 2009, 09:11:05 pm »
Am I the only one looking at the Twins lineup and wondering how the heck this team made the playoffs?  Outside of Mauer who is there to be afraid of?

It just tells you that defense and pitching are the key to success in this league. 
Cuddyer, Kubel, and Morneau all had good seasons at the dish.

Their problem is the lack of formidable hitting aside from that heart of the order.  They were a lot like the Nats once we lost Flores.

Offline DPMOmaha

  • Posts: 22885
Re: MLB-Watching (2009)
« Reply #613 on: October 09, 2009, 09:55:31 pm »
Except they have much better pitching, especially in the bullpen and they play very fundamentally sound.

Offline houston-nat

  • Posts: 19056
Re: MLB-Watching (2009)
« Reply #614 on: October 09, 2009, 10:01:39 pm »
Except they have much better pitching, especially in the bullpen and they play very fundamentally sound.
They basically have 4 John Lannans in their rotation.

Online JCA-CrystalCity

  • Global Moderator
  • ****
  • Posts: 45487
  • Platoon - not just a movie, a baseball obsession
Re: MLB-Watching (2009)
« Reply #615 on: October 10, 2009, 12:12:03 pm »
They basically have 4 John Lannans in their rotation.

True.  What killed them was Liriano's injury and two bad trades:  Santana and Garza / Bartlett.  The GM played it cute trying to paly the Red Sox off against the NYY and ended up with a lot less than they were offering for the right to overpay Santana.  Delmon Young may still turn out OK (he had a decent 2d half), but they ended up with an outfield surplus when Span panned out and Kubel became healthy.  They could really use a power arm to go with Blackburn and Baker.

As for their bullpen, it shows the streakiness of bullpens.  A few years ago they were incredibly deep (Crain had 8 wins, Romero and Rincon were effective, Guerrier was on the way) in front of Nathan.  Actually, it kind of sounds like Rauch, Ayala, Rivera, and Schroeder in front of Chad, except Nathan is better than Chad in his prime. Or at least until he threw that meatball to A-Rod.

Offline houston-nat

  • Posts: 19056
Re: MLB-Watching (2009)
« Reply #616 on: October 23, 2009, 10:55:26 am »
Yet another reason why J.P. Ricciardi is a horrible GM.

Quote
ESPN's Keith Law, former special assistant to the GM in Toronto, mentioned a few interesting Blue Jays' non-trades in his chat today. He says that the Mets once offered 19-year-old David Wright for Jose Cruz Jr., but J.P. Ricciardi said "I'm not trading a major league player for some guy in the (Low Class-A) Sally League." Klaw also mentions that the Jays had a chance to trade Cruz Jr. for Rafael Soriano, but wouldn't do it unless the Mariners kicked in Clint Nageotte as well.

Online The Chief

  • Posts: 31838
    • http://www.wnff.net
Re: MLB-Watching (2009)
« Reply #617 on: October 23, 2009, 11:11:46 am »
Yet another reason why J.P. Ricciardi is a horrible GM.

And Steve Phillips

Online imref

  • Posts: 47364
  • NG Nattitude?
Re: MLB-Watching (2009)
« Reply #618 on: October 23, 2009, 02:05:25 pm »
And Steve Phillips

I have a newfound respect for Mr. Phillips these days. :-) (just kidding)


Is this not the worst year ever for MLB playoffs though?  Last nights game was almost as bad as watching the Nats bullpen.

Online JCA-CrystalCity

  • Global Moderator
  • ****
  • Posts: 45487
  • Platoon - not just a movie, a baseball obsession
Re: MLB-Watching (2009)
« Reply #619 on: October 23, 2009, 05:02:41 pm »
Actually, I loved the 7th, 8th and 9th last night. In the 7th, you got to see that even good teams with good bullpens implode. I admit I would have gone with my best reliever in place of a fading Lackey at the point Scioscia did it, and I can't stand the Scioscia hype machine.  Then to come back in the bottom of the inning?  Any time (other than Game 3 of the ALDS) Vlady delivers is cool.  Rivera's getting out of the 8th was cool too, and waiting for the Fuentes failure that did not happen brought back memories of all the cardio stressing closers of the past.

Offline tomterp

  • Global Moderator
  • ****
  • Posts: 33885
  • Hell yes!
Re: MLB-Watching (2009)
« Reply #620 on: October 23, 2009, 09:40:21 pm »
Is this not the worst year ever for MLB playoffs though?  Last nights game was almost as bad as watching the Nats bullpen.

No pennant races either.  The complete dregs.

Offline blue911

  • Posts: 18595
Re: MLB-Watching (2009)
« Reply #621 on: October 24, 2009, 01:06:42 am »
No pennant races either.  The complete dregs.

The Twins and Tigers had to play 163 games.

Offline tomterp

  • Global Moderator
  • ****
  • Posts: 33885
  • Hell yes!
Re: MLB-Watching (2009)
« Reply #622 on: October 25, 2009, 09:19:45 pm »
The Twins and Tigers had to play 163 games.

Yeah, the Tigers got choke-itus, okay, one out of 8 slots was contested, but still a major let down this season. 

Offline blue911

  • Posts: 18595
Re: MLB-Watching (2009)
« Reply #623 on: October 26, 2009, 08:05:57 am »
Yeah, the Tigers got choke-itus, okay, one out of 8 slots was contested, but still a major let down this season. 

I think if the Nats had played .500 ball nobody would have noticed the lack of September suspense.

Online JCA-CrystalCity

  • Global Moderator
  • ****
  • Posts: 45487
  • Platoon - not just a movie, a baseball obsession
Re: MLB-Watching (2009)
« Reply #624 on: November 05, 2009, 04:25:48 pm »
Bobby Abreu resings with Angels for 2 years, $19m guaranteed ($9 per plus option w/ $1m buy out).
http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/angels-re-sign-abreu
Mark Teahen traded for Chris Getz, Josh Fields.  Say hello to 2d base, Alexei Ramirez or Gordon Beckam.
http://www.fangraphs.com/fantasy/index.php/traded-mark-teahen-for-chris-getz-josh-fields