Author Topic: 2007 Washington Redskins Season Thread  (Read 47624 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Senators2005

  • Lake Ridge, VA
  • Posts: 12271
  • Go Natsssssss!
    • http://nationalsnation.spaces.live.com/
Re: 2007 Redskins discussion thread
« Reply #450 on: December 23, 2007, 09:27:13 pm »
That's how you do it  :thumbs: You're learnin'
:roll:  If you do your job well...you get praise.  When you don't...you get the opposite.  That's the real life you need to learn.   :lol:

Offline ronnynat

  • Posts: 23269
Re: 2007 Redskins discussion thread
« Reply #451 on: December 23, 2007, 09:28:36 pm »
:roll:  If you do your job well...you get praise.  When you make a mistake...you get the opposite.  That's the real life you need to learn.   :lol:

oh, go take a picture or something :lol:

Offline ronnynat

  • Posts: 23269
Re: 2007 Redskins discussion thread
« Reply #452 on: December 23, 2007, 09:31:59 pm »
This game is going perfectly right now. Keep it up, boys!

Offline shoeshineboy

  • Posts: 7970
  • Walks Kill!! Walks Kill! Walks Kill!!!!
Re: 2007 Redskins discussion thread
« Reply #453 on: December 23, 2007, 09:32:29 pm »
Is Randel El incapable of running straight ahead?

Offline Senators2005

  • Lake Ridge, VA
  • Posts: 12271
  • Go Natsssssss!
    • http://nationalsnation.spaces.live.com/
Re: 2007 Redskins discussion thread
« Reply #454 on: December 23, 2007, 09:34:12 pm »
I'm glad to see they are going to Sellers on short yardage instead of Portis.

Offline Senators2005

  • Lake Ridge, VA
  • Posts: 12271
  • Go Natsssssss!
    • http://nationalsnation.spaces.live.com/
Re: 2007 Redskins discussion thread
« Reply #455 on: December 23, 2007, 09:38:27 pm »
Is that legal?  Can a defender push you out of bounds so that the receiver is unable to catch the ball?

Offline ronnynat

  • Posts: 23269
Re: 2007 Redskins discussion thread
« Reply #456 on: December 23, 2007, 09:40:48 pm »
Is that legal?  Can a defender push you out of bounds so that the receiver is unable to catch the ball?

Yeah, as long as it's within 5 yards. They talked about a play like that during a Cowboys game early in the season. It's one of the few advantages a DB has.

Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 76956
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: 2007 Redskins discussion thread
« Reply #457 on: December 23, 2007, 09:40:53 pm »
Is that legal?  Can a defender push you out of bounds so that the receiver is unable to catch the ball?

Yes. It's the receiver's duty to not get pushed out of bounds.

Offline Senators2005

  • Lake Ridge, VA
  • Posts: 12271
  • Go Natsssssss!
    • http://nationalsnation.spaces.live.com/
Re: 2007 Redskins discussion thread
« Reply #458 on: December 23, 2007, 09:41:59 pm »
Wow...that seems like a cheesey rule to me.  <shrug>

Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 76956
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: 2007 Redskins discussion thread
« Reply #459 on: December 23, 2007, 09:42:32 pm »
Portis looked explosive on that draw. I thought he was going to score.

The refs are full of crap. How did Mike Alstott score but Sellers didn't on that play?

We're blowing that crap out of the water right now.

Offline Senators2005

  • Lake Ridge, VA
  • Posts: 12271
  • Go Natsssssss!
    • http://nationalsnation.spaces.live.com/
Re: 2007 Redskins discussion thread
« Reply #460 on: December 23, 2007, 09:42:35 pm »
TOUCH DOWN SKINS!

Offline ronnynat

  • Posts: 23269
Re: 2007 Redskins discussion thread
« Reply #461 on: December 23, 2007, 09:43:06 pm »
what a fukin play!

Offline sportsfan882

  • Posts: 93631
Re: 2007 Redskins discussion thread
« Reply #462 on: December 23, 2007, 09:43:12 pm »
OMG!!! JOE HAS GUTS!!! WOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!! GREAT THROW CLINTON!!!

Offline tomterp

  • Global Moderator
  • ****
  • Posts: 33885
  • Hell yes!
Re: 2007 Redskins discussion thread
« Reply #463 on: December 23, 2007, 09:43:51 pm »
 :worship: :woop: :woop: :woop: :clap: :clap:

Offline Senators2005

  • Lake Ridge, VA
  • Posts: 12271
  • Go Natsssssss!
    • http://nationalsnation.spaces.live.com/
Re: 2007 Redskins discussion thread
« Reply #464 on: December 23, 2007, 09:44:08 pm »
Wow...the offense is really starting to click during this drive.  That was the most together I've seem them in execution this season.

Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 76956
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: 2007 Redskins discussion thread
« Reply #465 on: December 23, 2007, 09:44:17 pm »
I don't get why Gibbs insists on going for 2 when it's early and unnecessary.

Offline sportsfan882

  • Posts: 93631
Re: 2007 Redskins discussion thread
« Reply #466 on: December 23, 2007, 09:44:20 pm »
Why did they go for 2?  :shock:

Cooley did drop it though

Offline Senators2005

  • Lake Ridge, VA
  • Posts: 12271
  • Go Natsssssss!
    • http://nationalsnation.spaces.live.com/
Re: 2007 Redskins discussion thread
« Reply #467 on: December 23, 2007, 09:46:04 pm »
It's funny how Joe thinks these days...he goes for two and seems to want to play aggressive during the first half.  Then he sits on whatever he did during the second half.

Offline ronnynat

  • Posts: 23269
Re: 2007 Redskins discussion thread
« Reply #468 on: December 23, 2007, 09:46:13 pm »
Best half this season by far! What a game to do it, too. Without Peterson, the Vikings are awful!

Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 76956
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: 2007 Redskins discussion thread
« Reply #469 on: December 23, 2007, 09:46:20 pm »
I know it's early but just for the sake of discussion, the playoff road is set. If the Redskins make it in they travel to Seattle (which sucks but we owe them one) and then Dallas for the second round if they were to advance. Of course there's still along way to go for that to come to pass.

Offline Senators2005

  • Lake Ridge, VA
  • Posts: 12271
  • Go Natsssssss!
    • http://nationalsnation.spaces.live.com/
Re: 2007 Redskins discussion thread
« Reply #470 on: December 23, 2007, 09:47:47 pm »
I know it's early but just for the sake of discussion, the playoff road is set. If the Redskins make it in they travel to Seattle (which sucks but we owe them one) and then Dallas for the second round if they were to advance. Of course there's still along way to go for that to come to pass.
We have to beat Dallas first and that's a tall order.

Offline ronnynat

  • Posts: 23269
Re: 2007 Redskins discussion thread
« Reply #471 on: December 23, 2007, 09:49:20 pm »
I know it's early but just for the sake of discussion, the playoff road is set. If the Redskins make it in they travel to Seattle (which sucks but we owe them one) and then Dallas for the second round if they were to advance. Of course there's still along way to go for that to come to pass.

A friend of mine owes me tickets to the game if we have to go to Seattle. That'd be fukin awesome!

Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 76956
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: 2007 Redskins discussion thread
« Reply #472 on: December 23, 2007, 09:50:02 pm »
We have to beat Dallas first and that's a tall order.

Yeah that's why I said it's still a way off but I thought I'd throw it out there for digestion. I shouldn't because I remember that time I began celebrating a Nats win only to see the Nats snatch defeat from the jaws of victory :? So I'll save the rum for another hour :lol:

Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 76956
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: 2007 Redskins discussion thread
« Reply #473 on: December 23, 2007, 09:50:34 pm »
A friend of mine owes me tickets to the game if we have to go to Seattle. That'd be fukin awesome!

You can stay with Erica and Robert Fick :lol:

Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 76956
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: 2007 Redskins discussion thread
« Reply #474 on: December 23, 2007, 09:52:10 pm »
Man when Springs intercepted that pass I smacked the crap out of my hand. I hope I didn't re-open the cut on my hand :?