Author Topic: Nationals vs Reds, Game 2  (Read 30892 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline wpa2629

  • Posts: 17048
  • No Trade Clause
Re: Nationals VS Reds, Game 2
« Reply #200 on: August 01, 2007, 08:19:02 pm »
That's not good ... brain cramp by John there - he's gotta cover third there ...

Offline tomterp

  • Global Moderator
  • ****
  • Posts: 33885
  • Hell yes!
Re: Nationals VS Reds, Game 2
« Reply #201 on: August 01, 2007, 08:19:32 pm »
Phillips totally burned our Dunn overshift.

Offline wpa2629

  • Posts: 17048
  • No Trade Clause
Re: Nationals VS Reds, Game 2
« Reply #202 on: August 01, 2007, 08:19:34 pm »
Ok ... that was weird ... but no damage - it's still early Nats - keep your heads in the game ...

Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 76956
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: Nationals VS Reds, Game 2
« Reply #203 on: August 01, 2007, 08:19:40 pm »
A monster jack in GAB is a deep out in RFK.

Offline wpa2629

  • Posts: 17048
  • No Trade Clause
Re: Nationals VS Reds, Game 2
« Reply #204 on: August 01, 2007, 08:20:06 pm »
Phillips totally burned our Dunn overshift.

Gotta give it to him - Pretty heads up play by phillips ...

Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 76956
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: Nationals VS Reds, Game 2
« Reply #205 on: August 01, 2007, 08:20:33 pm »
Heads up by Phillips. How nice would it have been if Schneider had led Zimmerman a little bit and he had tagged his ass out?

Offline nyexpofan

  • Posts: 2053
Re: Nationals VS Reds, Game 2
« Reply #206 on: August 01, 2007, 08:20:47 pm »
that was weird - phillips had 2 steals on one pitch -

Offline PC

  • Posts: 47236
Re: Nationals VS Reds, Game 2
« Reply #207 on: August 01, 2007, 08:20:50 pm »
We need to play this game like it's 0-0.

That one play threw "the unwritten rules" out of the window!  >:(

Offline wpa2629

  • Posts: 17048
  • No Trade Clause
Re: Nationals VS Reds, Game 2
« Reply #208 on: August 01, 2007, 08:21:24 pm »
Heads up by Phillips. How nice would it have been if Schneider had led Zimmerman a little bit and he had tagged his ass out?


I would have dug it ...

Offline nyexpofan

  • Posts: 2053
Re: Nationals VS Reds, Game 2
« Reply #209 on: August 01, 2007, 08:23:33 pm »
John Lannan lost his bid for a no- no! but still has a 7-0 lead after pitching 4 innings (59 pitches) lets see if Lannan can get into the 7th

Offline PC

  • Posts: 47236
Re: Nationals VS Reds, Game 2
« Reply #210 on: August 01, 2007, 08:24:14 pm »
We need to score this inning.  Even if it's just one run.  It's never a good idea, even with a big lead, to go extended innings without scoring.

Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 76956
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: Nationals VS Reds, Game 2
« Reply #211 on: August 01, 2007, 08:25:03 pm »
We need to play this game like it's 0-0.

That one play threw "the unwritten rules" out of the window!  >:(

Does the window actually have to be open for the 'book of unwritten rules' to be tossed out the window?

Offline wpa2629

  • Posts: 17048
  • No Trade Clause
Re: Nationals VS Reds, Game 2
« Reply #212 on: August 01, 2007, 08:25:39 pm »
10 hits! in 4 innings!!

Offline sportsfan882

  • Posts: 93631
Re: Nationals VS Reds, Game 2
« Reply #213 on: August 01, 2007, 08:25:40 pm »
Zim and Dmitri single

Offline wpa2629

  • Posts: 17048
  • No Trade Clause
Re: Nationals VS Reds, Game 2
« Reply #214 on: August 01, 2007, 08:25:59 pm »
Does the window actually have to be open for the 'book of unwritten rules' to be tossed out the window?

Ah hell - just pitch through the glass ...

Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 76956
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: Nationals VS Reds, Game 2
« Reply #215 on: August 01, 2007, 08:26:00 pm »
Young doing his thing after a brief lapse.

Offline wpa2629

  • Posts: 17048
  • No Trade Clause
Re: Nationals VS Reds, Game 2
« Reply #216 on: August 01, 2007, 08:26:30 pm »
That was a strike??? uh??? maybe for a 7 iron!

Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 76956
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: Nationals VS Reds, Game 2
« Reply #217 on: August 01, 2007, 08:27:10 pm »
Ah hell - just pitch through the glass ...

What if it's the kind of glass that can only be broken in emergencies?

Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 76956
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: Nationals VS Reds, Game 2
« Reply #218 on: August 01, 2007, 08:27:42 pm »
That was a strike??? uh??? maybe for a 7 iron!

Yeah the umpire is trying to speed up the game.

Offline wpa2629

  • Posts: 17048
  • No Trade Clause
Re: Nationals VS Reds, Game 2
« Reply #219 on: August 01, 2007, 08:28:08 pm »
What if it's the kind of glass that can only be broken in emergencies?

Stap it to that funny looking ax thing and give it a whirl ...

Offline wpa2629

  • Posts: 17048
  • No Trade Clause
Re: Nationals VS Reds, Game 2
« Reply #220 on: August 01, 2007, 08:28:40 pm »
Yeah the umpire is trying to speed up the game.


Booo lazy impatient sweaty umpire - Hooray Nats!

Offline wpa2629

  • Posts: 17048
  • No Trade Clause
Re: Nationals VS Reds, Game 2
« Reply #221 on: August 01, 2007, 08:29:34 pm »
ZIM  :worship:

Offline wpa2629

  • Posts: 17048
  • No Trade Clause
Re: Nationals VS Reds, Game 2
« Reply #222 on: August 01, 2007, 08:33:04 pm »
Lannan  :worship: - Nats bats  :worship: - Nats defense  :worship: the fabulous outfit I wore today  :worship:

Offline sportsfan882

  • Posts: 93631
Re: Nationals VS Reds, Game 2
« Reply #223 on: August 01, 2007, 08:33:28 pm »
great throw Felipe and man is Lannan rolling!

Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 76956
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: Nationals VS Reds, Game 2
« Reply #224 on: August 01, 2007, 08:34:48 pm »
Lannan is doing what's necessary. Pitching to contact and letting the gloves back him up.