Author Topic: I bet Pattersons done (Read 10541 times)

Kenz aFan · « **Reply #75 on:** June 27, 2007, 01:53:33 pm »

Quote from: tomterp on June 26, 2007, 02:27:46 pm

I admit I have yet to check out my theory, but I bet you find that the Nats had a winning record by thin margins in Hernandez, Patterson and Loiaza starts, and big deficit defeats in games by other starters, if you look at first half 2005. You could win 2/3 of games, and be outscored in total under this scenario.

For what it's worth, the Nats played in 60 one-run games in 2005, winning 29. In the games that ended by 1 run, the starters and the Nats record in those games is as follows:

Hernandez: 10-9 (35 starts)
Loaiza: 4-8 (34 starts)
Patterson: 8-3 (31 starts)
Armas: 2-7 (19 starts)
Drese: 4-2 (11 starts)
Ohka: 1-0 (9 starts)
Day: 0-1 (5 starts)
Vargas: 0-1 (4 starts)

The other starters (Carrasco, Kim, Rauch, Halama, Bergmann, Rasner and White) accounted for the remaining 14 starts, with none ending by a one-run difference.

Remember, these are the team won/loss records for those games, not that of the starting pitchers.

tomterp · « **Reply #76 on:** June 27, 2007, 03:32:03 pm »

Interesting, Patterson won 9 games, 8 of which were ultimately 1 run games. I recall he got very little run support that year, which I take to just be a random thing.

shoeshineboy · « **Reply #77 on:** June 27, 2007, 03:35:58 pm »

Quote from: tomterp on June 27, 2007, 03:32:03 pm

Interesting, Patterson won 9 games, 8 of which were ultimately 1 run games. I recall he got very little run support that year, which I take to just be a random thing.

BTW, regarding your post on the big 3 on the '05 Astros, I looked at the stats and it appeared that between the three of them, they started around seven games in which the Astros scored zero runs. Clemens started at least three where the Astros lost 1-0.

Kenz aFan · « **Reply #78 on:** June 27, 2007, 03:53:54 pm »

Quote from: tomterp on June 27, 2007, 03:32:03 pm

Interesting, Patterson won 9 games, 8 of which were ultimately 1 run games. I recall he got very little run support that year, which I take to just be a random thing.

The Nats won 8 of Patterson's starts that eventually ended in one-run games. I'd have to research more to find out how many of those one-run games were actually won by the Starter.

OK, I'm back... here are the numbers:

Nat's 1-Run Record In Games 1-Run #Won by Starter Games Starter* ========================== Hernandez 10-9 6 Loaiza 4-8 1 Patterson 8-3 2 Armas 2-7 2 Drese 4-2 3 Ohka 1-0 1 Day 0-1 0 Vargas 0-1 0

* Starting pitcher getting win decision

kimnat · « **Reply #79 on:** June 27, 2007, 03:54:56 pm »

Quote from: metssuck on June 26, 2007, 06:22:05 pm

I remmber Baerga and blanco from 05. I never even heard of the other guy

Whatever became of Baerga? I really liked him. I think it's just because I liked saying his name! Has a nice roll off the tongue to it!

natsfan1a · « **Reply #80 on:** June 27, 2007, 04:09:33 pm »

Svrluga did a "where are they now" blog one time and I believe he said that Baerga was doing color commentary for a Spanish-language network. I liked Baerga, too.

kimnat · « **Reply #81 on:** June 27, 2007, 04:11:08 pm »

oh that's good! I'm glad he landed somewhere good!

spidernat · « **Reply #82 on:** June 27, 2007, 05:58:00 pm »

Quote from: tomterp on June 27, 2007, 03:32:03 pm

Interesting, Patterson won 9 games, 8 of which were ultimately 1 run games. I recall he got very little run support that year, which I take to just be a random thing.

I don't how well the numbers would support this but I recall Loiaza going thru a stretch in 2005 where he too didn't get much run support.

BTW, I love when the girls chime in on topics and stray from the substance of the discussion

(don't take offense ladies I meant it in a nice way).

natsfan1a · « **Reply #83 on:** June 27, 2007, 05:59:30 pm »

We're just little ol' tangential thinkers

kimnat · « **Reply #84 on:** June 27, 2007, 06:16:41 pm »

Well, now that you mention it....Baerga is a really nice guy!

spidernat · « **Reply #85 on:** June 27, 2007, 06:18:57 pm »

Quote from: kimnat on June 27, 2007, 06:16:41 pm

Well, now that you mention it....Baerga is a really nice guy!

There should be a smiley where the little guy is falling off his chair backwards to express laughter and shock.

nats2playoffs · « **Reply #86 on:** June 27, 2007, 06:24:09 pm »

Quote from: spidernat on June 27, 2007, 06:18:57 pm

There should be a smiley where the little guy is falling off his chair backwards to express laughter and shock.

"That'll do, Pig." Backwards and forwards.

spidernat · « **Reply #87 on:** June 27, 2007, 06:28:24 pm »

Quote from: nats2playoffs on June 27, 2007, 06:24:09 pm

"That'll do, Pig." Backwards and forwards.

Nice.

tomterp · « **Reply #88 on:** June 28, 2007, 08:22:15 am »

Quote from: kimnat on June 27, 2007, 06:16:41 pm

Well, now that you mention it....Baerga is a really nice guy!

I love his hair! Right up there with Vinny's mullet, if you ask me.

natsfan1a · « **Reply #89 on:** June 28, 2007, 08:30:44 am »

He did have some great hair...

kimnat · « **Reply #90 on:** June 28, 2007, 02:45:04 pm »

Nice and thick! I was always shocked to see it. I just didn't imagine him with so much and so thick.

So, is this the kind of tangent you were looking for?

tomterp · « **Reply #91 on:** June 28, 2007, 02:51:40 pm »

Nobody has bold hair like these guys did.

kimnat · « **Reply #92 on:** June 28, 2007, 02:53:38 pm »

Wow! Look at Maj's curls! I told Andrew that girls love curls (he hates his chemo curls and isn't convinced). But those are some truly fine heads of hair in that pic!

Edit: Castilla and Baerga aren't too hard on the eyes, either! teeehee

spidernat · « **Reply #93 on:** June 28, 2007, 03:03:46 pm »

Quote from: spidernat on June 27, 2007, 05:58:00 pm

BTW, I love when the girls chime in on topics and stray from the substance of the discussion (don't take offense ladies I meant it in a nice way).

Quote from: natsfan1a on June 27, 2007, 05:59:30 pm

We're just little ol' tangential thinkers

Quote from: kimnat on June 28, 2007, 02:45:04 pm

So, is this the kind of tangent you were looking for?

I'd like to respectfully retract my statement above

tomterp · « **Reply #94 on:** June 28, 2007, 03:06:59 pm »

Now, I hope the follically challenged (Bacsik types) don't take offense at all this hair worship.

kimnat · « **Reply #95 on:** June 28, 2007, 03:07:38 pm »

(spiderpost)

Spidernat: I am laughing like crazy over here!

spidernat · « **Reply #96 on:** June 28, 2007, 03:14:18 pm »

Quote from: tomterp on June 28, 2007, 03:06:59 pm

Now, I hope the follically challenged (Bacsik types) don't take offense at all this hair worship.

Doesn't he look like he should play the role of Lex Luthor?

Now we've all strayed. Blame the girls

tomterp · « **Reply #97 on:** June 28, 2007, 03:17:57 pm »

Quote from: spidernat on June 28, 2007, 03:14:18 pm

Now we've all strayed. Blame the girls

Right. Men would never stray

, except for the temptations presented....

kimnat · « **Reply #98 on:** June 28, 2007, 03:18:41 pm »

YES! But he's too nice to be Lex Luthor!

Cute Luthor story! Andrew was about 5 (maybe 4 1/2). He's been into action figures for 2-3 years now. But he knew that Lex is a bad guy and wanted him to go w/ all his good guys. So, he wrote a "order" to Toys R Us for Lex Lufor (sp. on purpose and put it in the mailbox. It was so cute. I took the "order" out of the mailbox and called my mother in law and had her go pick it up at the toy store near her house and mail it to Andrew. He was estatic! But as he got older, we told him that orders needed money. He's now forgotten it, but it was so sweet!

kimnat · « **Reply #99 on:** June 28, 2007, 03:20:52 pm »

Quote from: spidernat on June 28, 2007, 03:14:18 pm

Now we've all strayed. Blame the girls

Well, you asked!

Quote from: tomterp on June 28, 2007, 03:17:57 pm

Right. Men would never stray , except for the temptations presented....

Yeah yeah, always blamin' the gals for temptation problems (Eve w/ the apple). Some habits never die.