Author Topic: 2018-2019 Offseason Moves  (Read 118558 times)

0 Members and 5 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline aBaltoNat

  • Posts: 2023
Re: 2018-2019 Offseason Moves
« Reply #1725 on: March 19, 2019, 12:59:28 pm »
I have to be honest ....I hate watching Stevenson play. He looks awkward and doesn't add much.

Offline CoryTheFormerExposFan

  • Posts: 2190
Re: 2018-2019 Offseason Moves
« Reply #1726 on: March 19, 2019, 01:11:46 pm »
Stevenson is fine for the few weeks until MAT is back.

I agree.  With off-days built in early and the fact everyone is fresh anyway...MAYBE he starts a single token game?  Otherwise, he's probably about the last option as a pinch hitter and could pinch run or be a late game defensive sub.  Just not a lot of work to be done that makes it worth going out to get somebody else.  In a few weeks we should not only have MAT back, but we'll have Howie as a corner OF option. 

Offline aBaltoNat

  • Posts: 2023
Re: 2018-2019 Offseason Moves
« Reply #1727 on: March 19, 2019, 01:48:59 pm »
Trout, 12 years and $430M.

Suck it.

Offline CoryTheFormerExposFan

  • Posts: 2190
Re: 2018-2019 Offseason Moves
« Reply #1728 on: March 19, 2019, 02:38:30 pm »
Trout, 12 years and $430M.

Suck it.

Who are you telling to suck it?  Did you get a percentage?

Offline Duke of Earl

  • Posts: 743
Re: 2018-2019 Offseason Moves
« Reply #1729 on: March 19, 2019, 03:02:39 pm »
Who are you telling to suck it?

Harper.  Reasonable reaction, it was my first thought too.

Offline Elvir Ovcina

  • Posts: 5831
Re: 2018-2019 Offseason Moves
« Reply #1730 on: March 19, 2019, 03:20:17 pm »
Who are you telling to suck it?  Did you get a percentage?

It's an Orioles fan posting on a Nats board to tell a Phillies player to suck it.  What are you expecting, clear-headed sanity?

Offline CoryTheFormerExposFan

  • Posts: 2190
Re: 2018-2019 Offseason Moves
« Reply #1731 on: March 19, 2019, 04:08:22 pm »
Harper.  Reasonable reaction, it was my first thought too.

Well Harper and Trout are friends...Harper was recruiting Trout to come to Philly and take that same kind of money.  I think Harper and his 330 million are feeling okay about it. 

Online Slateman

  • Posts: 66860
  • THE SUMMONER OF THE REVERSE JINX
Re: 2018-2019 Offseason Moves
« Reply #1732 on: March 19, 2019, 04:10:43 pm »
Harper is going to live rent free in y'all s heads for a while

Offline Duke of Earl

  • Posts: 743
Re: 2018-2019 Offseason Moves
« Reply #1733 on: March 19, 2019, 04:24:42 pm »
Well Harper and Trout are friends...Harper was recruiting Trout to come to Philly...
A clear case of tampering, Harper should be suspended.

Offline Duke of Earl

  • Posts: 743
Re: 2018-2019 Offseason Moves
« Reply #1734 on: March 19, 2019, 04:26:20 pm »
Harper was recruiting Trout to come to Philly and take that same kind of money.  I think Harper and his 330 million are feeling okay about it.
He knew that his "record breaking" contract would eventually be broken (as all "records" are) but I'm sure he wasn't expecting it to happen in less than three weeks.

Offline hotshot

  • Posts: 1455
Re: 2018-2019 Offseason Moves
« Reply #1735 on: March 19, 2019, 05:11:14 pm »
Trout's on a whole other level from Bryce. Contract reflects that!

Offline Squab

  • Global Moderator
  • ****
  • Posts: 4528
  • me lookin at the bullpen
Re: 2018-2019 Offseason Moves
« Reply #1736 on: March 19, 2019, 05:31:44 pm »
Trout's on a whole other level from Bryce. Contract reflects that!

It doesn't really.

Quote
As first reported by Passan, Mike Trout and the Angels have agreed to a 12-year deal worth $430 million, with Bill Shaikan reporting the deal will come in at $426.5 million. Because Trout was already owed $66.5 million over the next two seasons, the contract is functionally a 10-year extension worth $360 million. Trout is essentially accepting something similar to the Harper/Machado deals two years in advance. This is not the first time Trout has made this choice, which is very much a personal decision, but it is one that has cost himself potentially hundreds of millions of dollars.

https://blogs.fangraphs.com/mike-trout-leaves-money-on-the-table-again/

But not hitting free agency for another 2 years, never know what could happen.

Offline Elvir Ovcina

  • Posts: 5831
Re: 2018-2019 Offseason Moves
« Reply #1737 on: March 19, 2019, 06:39:34 pm »
It doesn't really.

Isn't it ~10 million a year extra for roughly the same period of his career?  I realize we're in the cartoon money stratum, but even there Hello Kitty and the Lion King be different things.

Online JCA-CrystalCity

  • Global Moderator
  • ****
  • Posts: 45941
  • Platoon - not just a movie, a baseball obsession
Re: 2018-2019 Offseason Moves
« Reply #1738 on: March 19, 2019, 07:13:05 pm »
It doesn't really.

https://blogs.fangraphs.com/mike-trout-leaves-money-on-the-table-again/

But not hitting free agency for another 2 years, never know what could happen.
help me with the math.  Isn't 10 years, $360MM more money and more money per year than 13 years, $330MM.  How on earth could this guy say Trout accepted the Harper deal 2 years in advance?

Online Slateman

  • Posts: 66860
  • THE SUMMONER OF THE REVERSE JINX
Re: 2018-2019 Offseason Moves
« Reply #1739 on: March 19, 2019, 07:34:55 pm »
help me with the math.  Isn't 10 years, $360MM more money and more money per year than 13 years, $330MM.  How on earth could this guy say Trout accepted the Harper deal 2 years in advance?

I think hes saying in comparison and accounting for the standard inflation and market increase.

Effectively, if Harper or Machado were to have been born two years later, thus hitting free agency two years from now, that contract is similar to what they would have got.

IOW, it sounds like a huge number, but in reality is a moderately small bump up from Machado and Harper.

Online JCA-CrystalCity

  • Global Moderator
  • ****
  • Posts: 45941
  • Platoon - not just a movie, a baseball obsession
Re: 2018-2019 Offseason Moves
« Reply #1740 on: March 19, 2019, 08:09:23 pm »
I think hes saying in comparison and accounting for the standard inflation and market increase.

Effectively, if Harper or Machado were to have been born two years later, thus hitting free agency two years from now, that contract is similar to what they would have got.

IOW, it sounds like a huge number, but in reality is a moderately small bump up from Machado and Harper.
elvir is right.  no way $25.35 MM over 13 years is worth more than 2 years of $33MM followed by 10 years @ $36MM.  that's not PV, and there's no way inflation in salaries makes $/WAR equal.

Offline varoadking

  • Posts: 30960
  • King of Goodness
Re: 2018-2019 Offseason Moves
« Reply #1741 on: March 19, 2019, 09:08:01 pm »

I don't know if this will prove to be the best team in the last 8 years, but it's the one I've been the most anxious to see play. 

I really though 2012 was gonna be the year, and with each passing year, I've become less and less optimistic.  This group has changed all that...I like the team that Rizzo has built...and I haven't said that very often.


Offline bluestreak

  • Global Moderator
  • ****
  • Posts: 11279
Re: 2018-2019 Offseason Moves
« Reply #1742 on: March 19, 2019, 09:11:25 pm »
I don't know if this will prove to be the best team in the last 8 years, but it's the one I've been the most anxious to see play. 

I really though 2012 was gonna be the year, and with each passing year, I've become less and less optimistic.  This group has changed all that...I like the team that Rizzo has built...and I haven't said that very often.

I agree with this.

Offline sixthree175

  • Posts: 2354
  • Born in 1961
Re: 2018-2019 Offseason Moves
« Reply #1743 on: March 19, 2019, 09:35:36 pm »
elvir is right.  no way $25.35 MM over 13 years is worth more than 2 years of $33MM followed by 10 years @ $36MM.  that's not PV, and there's no way inflation in salaries makes $/WAR equal.
The Trout contract blows the Harper contract out of the water.  If Harper were to get 2 years at $33mm now, what would his 10-year value be in 2021? Nowhere near $360mm.

Offline NJ Ave

  • Posts: 3485
Re: 2018-2019 Offseason Moves
« Reply #1744 on: March 19, 2019, 09:46:24 pm »
Didn’t they basically give him more what the Dodgers offered Bryce (4/$165), THEN what the Rockies gave Arenado (8/$260) for a total of 12/$425?

I mean, it’s ridiculous to say it’s comparable to what the other guys got.

Online Natsinpwc

  • Posts: 28036
Re: 2018-2019 Offseason Moves
« Reply #1745 on: March 19, 2019, 10:12:30 pm »
I don't know if this will prove to be the best team in the last 8 years, but it's the one I've been the most anxious to see play. 

I really though 2012 was gonna be the year, and with each passing year, I've become less and less optimistic.  This group has changed all that...I like the team that Rizzo has built...and I haven't said that very often.
Kiss of death.  :hysterical:
You need to write them off as you did last year with the Caps.

Online Slateman

  • Posts: 66860
  • THE SUMMONER OF THE REVERSE JINX
Re: 2018-2019 Offseason Moves
« Reply #1746 on: March 19, 2019, 10:23:42 pm »
I don't know if this will prove to be the best team in the last 8 years, but it's the one I've been the most anxious to see play. 

I really though 2012 was gonna be the year, and with each passing year, I've become less and less optimistic.  This group has changed all that...I like the team that Rizzo has built...and I haven't said that very often.


It was a nice season while it lasted

Offline varoadking

  • Posts: 30960
  • King of Goodness
Re: 2018-2019 Offseason Moves
« Reply #1747 on: March 19, 2019, 10:47:52 pm »
NLCS or Bust!

Offline bluestreak

  • Global Moderator
  • ****
  • Posts: 11279
Re: 2018-2019 Offseason Moves
« Reply #1748 on: March 20, 2019, 10:55:51 am »
For a minor league contract, I’d have brought back Gio. He’s not so great as a #3, but he’d be a good #5. And he’ll give you innings when we have a starter who always ends up on the DL.

Offline CoryTheFormerExposFan

  • Posts: 2190
Re: 2018-2019 Offseason Moves
« Reply #1749 on: March 20, 2019, 10:59:25 am »
He knew that his "record breaking" contract would eventually be broken (as all "records" are) but I'm sure he wasn't expecting it to happen in less than three weeks.

I guess if some people need to picture Harper miserable with jealousy to feel better so they can say "suck it" then whatever works for them.