Watching Zim headed for another 0-4 night I'm trying to recap the replies on this thread in my mind. The Nats were right to keep him this off-season because A) he is too good to part with, after this slow April he'll bounce back to his old self, B) his value was so low no other team would take him, even if the Nats ate some salary, or C) he's got us by the balls with his no trade clause so we had no choice but to hope for the best.