Poll

The NL East winner will be (votes close 9/1):

Barves
15 (46.9%)
Phillies
6 (18.8%)
Nats
5 (15.6%)
Mets
2 (6.3%)
do the Marlins still count?
4 (12.5%)

Total Members Voted: 32

Voting closed: September 01, 2018, 02:36:33 pm

Author Topic: NL East (2018)  (Read 86492 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Natsinpwc

  • Posts: 28018
Re: NL East (2018)
« Reply #975 on: August 01, 2018, 02:37:54 pm »
If the Nats hang on today they will have made up two games on the Phillies over the last two series.  And one game on the Braves over that same stretch. Nats with 4 coming up against the Reds. Phillies 4 against the Marlins.  And the Braves 4 in NYC against the Mets. Need to win 3 of 4 or even a sweep to gain another game.

Offline dcpatti

  • Posts: 3051
Re: NL East (2018)
« Reply #976 on: August 01, 2018, 09:31:43 pm »
Tonight’s Marlins @ Braves is rained out, and rescheduled for an August 13 double header, giving the Barves 22 games in the 20-game stretch between days off. Half of those days are on the road.

Offline Smithian

  • Posts: 12294
  • Sunshine Squad 2025
Re: NL East (2018)
« Reply #977 on: August 02, 2018, 09:57:10 am »
If the Nats hang on today they will have made up two games on the Phillies over the last two series.  And one game on the Braves over that same stretch. Nats with 4 coming up against the Reds. Phillies 4 against the Marlins.  And the Braves 4 in NYC against the Mets. Need to win 3 of 4 or even a sweep to gain another game.

Just have to chip away. If no rainout, hopefully Scherzday gets us a little closer.

Offline Senatorswin

  • Posts: 2913
Re: NL East (2018)
« Reply #978 on: August 02, 2018, 11:40:54 am »
I'll bet Jim Riggleman wouldn't mind sticking it to the Nats this weekend.

Offline Ray D

  • Posts: 10073
Re: NL East (2018)
« Reply #979 on: August 02, 2018, 12:28:35 pm »
I'll bet Jim Riggleman wouldn't mind sticking it to the Nats this weekend.
Does Riggleman think of himself as the injured party, in that fiasco of 2011?  He quit on the team.

Offline imref

  • Posts: 47648
  • NG Nattitude?
Re: NL East (2018)
« Reply #980 on: August 02, 2018, 12:32:42 pm »
Does Riggleman think of himself as the injured party, in that fiasco of 2011?  He quit on the team.

because they wouldn't give him an extension, I'm sure in his mind he's got a chip on his shoulder.

Offline Ray D

  • Posts: 10073
Re: NL East (2018)
« Reply #981 on: August 02, 2018, 12:40:15 pm »
because they wouldn't give him an extension, I'm sure in his mind he's got a chip on his shoulder.
Yeah I get that but walking out like he did, when he did, was unforgivable and selfish and completely unjustified by the "extension" matter.  Many players refuse to discuss extensions during the season.  It's reasonable for a GM to have the same policy with a manager.

Offline imref

  • Posts: 47648
  • NG Nattitude?
Re: NL East (2018)
« Reply #982 on: August 02, 2018, 12:53:03 pm »
Yeah I get that but walking out like he did, when he did, was unforgivable and selfish and completely unjustified by the "extension" matter.  Many players refuse to discuss extensions during the season.  It's reasonable for a GM to have the same policy with a manager.

agreed, but I'd bet he sees it differently.  Walking out like he did isn't exactly a rational act.

Offline Slateman

  • Posts: 66853
  • THE SUMMONER OF THE REVERSE JINX
Re: NL East (2018)
« Reply #983 on: August 02, 2018, 12:55:03 pm »
Pretty much do or die. The Braves and Phillies get cushy opponents.

Offline dcpatti

  • Posts: 3051
Re: NL East (2018)
« Reply #984 on: August 02, 2018, 03:34:20 pm »
During yesterday's game against the Mets, Adam Eaton slid into second in an attempt to break up the double play. The Mets used their review challenge but the call was upheld: slide was legal, despite what looked like contact between Eaton and Mets' 2b Phillip Evans, who exited the game right after the play.

In today's Mets news:

 ‏
 
@timbhealey
Quote

Phillip Evans has an undisplaced fractured tibia — a broken leg, but not that bad of one, apparently. He said he’ll see the doctor again in a month and take it from there. He is disappointed.

 

@timbhealey

Quote
Phillip Evans on Adam Eaton’s slide: “You got a got a fast guy hitting a soft-hit ball. I don’t think you need to come in that hard that late.

“But I mean, it’s part of the game. I respect it. I respect playing hard-nosed baseball. I play hard as well.”


That's kinda crazy because the contact didn't look all that hard to me.   Replay is here https://twitter.com/MLBReplays/status/1024696623388012544

Unlucky rookie? Mets need more calcium?

Offline Greg_SRT

  • Posts: 4030
  • Fun while it lasted
Re: NL East (2018)
« Reply #985 on: August 02, 2018, 04:21:18 pm »
Mets dude didn’t even attempt to get out of the way. He wasn’t expecting contact, even if that contact was legal.

Nats need to play hard like that. Other teams need to get out of the way.

Offline imref

  • Posts: 47648
  • NG Nattitude?
Re: NL East (2018)
« Reply #986 on: August 02, 2018, 04:31:08 pm »
Nats are the only NLE team with a winning record over the last 10 (6-4)

Offline HalfSmokes

  • Posts: 21928
Re: NL East (2018)
« Reply #987 on: August 02, 2018, 04:37:51 pm »
Nats are the only NLE team with a winning record over the last 10 (6-4)

Braves and Phillies both went 5-5. If it takes 10 games to make up 1, the math gets pretty rough for the nats

Offline Slateman

  • Posts: 66853
  • THE SUMMONER OF THE REVERSE JINX
Re: NL East (2018)
« Reply #988 on: August 02, 2018, 10:19:31 pm »
And no ground gained.

Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 76956
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: NL East (2018)
« Reply #989 on: August 02, 2018, 10:21:05 pm »
no ground yielded either

Online nfotiu

  • Posts: 5175
Re: NL East (2018)
« Reply #990 on: August 02, 2018, 10:45:02 pm »
Braves and Phillies both went 5-5. If it takes 10 games to make up 1, the math gets pretty rough for the nats

There's about 50 games left, so the math works outs just right, I'd say.

Phillies and Braves both look like they're settling into a .500->.520 as the long season weighs on them.  A .600-.620 pace should pass them.  And it would pass them easily if they win the series left against them.

How we play is still mostly all that matters. 

Offline DPMOmaha

  • Posts: 22885
Re: NL East (2018)
« Reply #991 on: August 02, 2018, 11:52:05 pm »
There's about 50 games left, so the math works outs just right, I'd say.

Phillies and Braves both look like they're settling into a .500->.520 as the long season weighs on them.  A .600-.620 pace should pass them.  And it would pass them easily if they win the series left against them.

How we play is still mostly all that matters. 
Looks like a recipe for a 163.

Offline bluestreak

  • Global Moderator
  • ****
  • Posts: 11279
Re: NL East (2018)
« Reply #992 on: August 03, 2018, 12:19:30 am »
I’d take 163 at this point

Offline Slateman

  • Posts: 66853
  • THE SUMMONER OF THE REVERSE JINX
Re: NL East (2018)
« Reply #993 on: August 03, 2018, 07:04:53 am »
There's about 50 games left, so the math works outs just right, I'd say.

Phillies and Braves both look like they're settling into a .500->.520 as the long season weighs on them.  A .600-.620 pace should pass them.  And it would pass them easily if they win the series left against them.

How we play is still mostly all that matters. 
Except the Nationals aren't going to win 6 out of every 8. This team will come back down to Earth.

Coming out of the break, splitting with the Braves, then losing two out of three to the Brewers, then splitting a four game series with the Marlins killed any chance of a postseason in DC

Offline Greg_SRT

  • Posts: 4030
  • Fun while it lasted
Re: NL East (2018)
« Reply #994 on: August 03, 2018, 08:40:15 am »
Except the Nationals aren't going to win 6 out of every 8. This team will come back down to Earth.

Coming out of the break, splitting with the Braves, then losing two out of three to the Brewers, then splitting a four game series with the Marlins killed any chance of a postseason in DC

You may be right, you may be wrong.

I can’t imagine being upset during a winning streak tho.

Online nfotiu

  • Posts: 5175
Re: NL East (2018)
« Reply #995 on: August 03, 2018, 08:44:01 am »
Except the Nationals aren't going to win 6 out of every 8. This team will come back down to Earth.

Coming out of the break, splitting with the Braves, then losing two out of three to the Brewers, then splitting a four game series with the Marlins killed any chance of a postseason in DC

I said 6 out of 10 the rest of the way would probably do it.   That's the same pace they played over a year last year, and probably a little below what they were expected to play at this year.   Maybe coming back to earth for the Nats is playing .600 baseball. 

Offline dcpatti

  • Posts: 3051
Re: NL East (2018)
« Reply #996 on: August 03, 2018, 09:10:22 am »
Nats were winning roughly  6 out of 10 for the first two months of this season (33-23). May alone we went 20-7.

Offline Ray D

  • Posts: 10073
Re: NL East (2018)
« Reply #997 on: August 03, 2018, 09:23:27 am »



That's kinda crazy because the contact didn't look all that hard to me.   Replay is here https://twitter.com/MLBReplays/status/1024696623388012544

It didn't look hard, but it didn't look legal to me.  Not with the new rules.  Not that I'm a fan of the new rules.

Offline Natsinpwc

  • Posts: 28018
Re: NL East (2018)
« Reply #998 on: August 03, 2018, 09:28:19 am »
It didn't look hard, but it didn't look legal to me.  Not with the new rules.  Not that I'm a fan of the new rules.
Was watching the Mets broadcast and the announcers said it looked legal to them because he was in the baseline and slid  through the base.

Offline mitlen

  • Posts: 66171
  • We had 'em all the way.
Re: NL East (2018)
« Reply #999 on: August 03, 2018, 09:42:23 am »
Was watching the Mets broadcast and the announcers said it looked legal to them because he was in the baseline and slid  through the base.

Like most, I don't think it wasn't illegal but I did have a cringe moment watching it in slo-mo.   The legs of both players had an awkward looking "tangle".       I would have understood if one of the other Mets had gone after Eaton.     :shrug: