Author Topic: Nationals @ Cardinals, Game 1  (Read 14957 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline heeman82

  • Posts: 3358
Re: Nationals @ Cardinals, Game 1
« Reply #150: September 23, 2013, 10:37:29 PM »
freak that we want chad tracy

Offline PC

  • Posts: 47236
Re: Nationals @ Cardinals, Game 1
« Reply #151: September 23, 2013, 10:38:07 PM »
Just watching the game makes you realize the Nats have a way to go before they can really be considered a contender for the NL crown. The Cards are noticeably better in almost every aspect of the game.

I have to disagree.  This is the Cardinals.  This is nowhere near as good as the Nationals could be if they were well managed.

Offline heeman82

  • Posts: 3358
Re: Nationals @ Cardinals, Game 1
« Reply #152: September 23, 2013, 10:38:16 PM »
damn nice bunt

Offline sportsfan882

  • Posts: 93630
Re: Nationals @ Cardinals, Game 1
« Reply #153: September 23, 2013, 10:38:30 PM »
Nice bunt single for Lombo.

If Span bunts I quit. This is a hitting situation not a sacrifice situation. 6 outs left, can't afford to waste one.

Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 76205
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: Nationals @ Cardinals, Game 1
« Reply #154: September 23, 2013, 10:38:55 PM »
Who thought it was a good idea to schedule the raiders @ the broncos?  :smh:

Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 76205
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: Nationals @ Cardinals, Game 1
« Reply #155: September 23, 2013, 10:39:31 PM »

If Span bunts I quit.

:crackup:  How many times have you threatened this SF?

Offline PC

  • Posts: 47236
Re: Nationals @ Cardinals, Game 1
« Reply #156: September 23, 2013, 10:39:44 PM »
Lombardozzi's WAR is the primary reason why I don't trust WAR as a measure.  His WAR is always well under 1 which means he less than replacement level and then I watch him play.

Offline mitlen

  • Posts: 66080
  • We had 'em all the way.
Re: Nationals @ Cardinals, Game 1
« Reply #157: September 23, 2013, 10:40:12 PM »
Who thought it was a good idea to schedule the raiders @ the broncos?  :smh:

Large crowd in the Oakland market.    Weekend action is over and every one is home 'cause the crack houses are closed.

Offline Copecwby20

  • Posts: 2221
Re: Nationals @ Cardinals, Game 1
« Reply #158: September 23, 2013, 10:40:19 PM »
I love Lombo in a completely different way than my ex does. The guy always seems to come through.

Offline heeman82

  • Posts: 3358
Re: Nationals @ Cardinals, Game 1
« Reply #159: September 23, 2013, 10:41:20 PM »
more like randy chode

Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 76205
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: Nationals @ Cardinals, Game 1
« Reply #160: September 23, 2013, 10:41:51 PM »
See you next season SF.

Offline sportsfan882

  • Posts: 93630
Re: Nationals @ Cardinals, Game 1
« Reply #161: September 23, 2013, 10:42:34 PM »
That's a terrible bunt. Awful Davey awful.

Offline RobDibblesGhost

  • Posts: 30333
Re: Nationals @ Cardinals, Game 1
« Reply #162: September 23, 2013, 10:42:45 PM »
Nice bunt single for Lombo.

If Span bunts I quit. This is a hitting situation not a sacrifice situation. 6 outs left, can't afford to waste one.

Bye.

Offline Copecwby20

  • Posts: 2221
Re: Nationals @ Cardinals, Game 1
« Reply #163: September 23, 2013, 10:43:05 PM »
That's a terrible bunt. Awful Davey awful.

Bye!


Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 76205
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: Nationals @ Cardinals, Game 1
« Reply #165: September 23, 2013, 10:43:16 PM »
Bye.

Over the years we've learned that SF is not a man of his word though.  :lol:

Offline Displaced Bucco

  • Posts: 1602
  • Atlanta delenda est - Davey the Elder & WT Sherman
Re: Nationals @ Cardinals, Game 1
« Reply #166: September 23, 2013, 10:43:24 PM »
I have to disagree.  This is the Cardinals.  This is nowhere near as good as the Nationals could be if they were well managed.

Could be, the Cards overall approach is just solid...we've got good talent, but have got some growing up to do.  The Cards just grind and grind in every phase.  As SF said we have to be at our best to beat them, I don't think the reverse it true right now.

Offline sportsfan882

  • Posts: 93630
Re: Nationals @ Cardinals, Game 1
« Reply #167: September 23, 2013, 10:43:32 PM »
Now you need a single and only 2 outs left.

Why not let Span try to get a hit to keep the rally going? Now if Zimmerman chokes it's over.


Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 76205
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: Nationals @ Cardinals, Game 1
« Reply #168: September 23, 2013, 10:44:46 PM »
If he had grounded into a DP you would be nagging about why Davey didn't opt to bunt the runners over to put them in scoring position and removing the DP possibility for Zimmerman.

Offline sportsfan882

  • Posts: 93630
Re: Nationals @ Cardinals, Game 1
« Reply #169: September 23, 2013, 10:45:14 PM »
Martinez is a beast.

Offline heeman82

  • Posts: 3358
Re: Nationals @ Cardinals, Game 1
« Reply #170: September 23, 2013, 10:45:16 PM »
3 run jack coming up

Offline RobDibblesGhost

  • Posts: 30333
Re: Nationals @ Cardinals, Game 1
« Reply #171: September 23, 2013, 10:45:33 PM »
That would have been a DP, SF...

Offline heeman82

  • Posts: 3358
Re: Nationals @ Cardinals, Game 1
« Reply #172: September 23, 2013, 10:45:34 PM »
ahh freak my face

Offline sportsfan882

  • Posts: 93630
Re: Nationals @ Cardinals, Game 1
« Reply #173: September 23, 2013, 10:45:50 PM »
stupid. ground ball, still down by 1 run.

If we were down 1 the bunt would have been fine but we were down by 2.... Awful.

Offline sportsfan882

  • Posts: 93630
Re: Nationals @ Cardinals, Game 1
« Reply #174: September 23, 2013, 10:46:07 PM »
That would have been a DP, SF...
What if Span doubled down the line or even a single?