Author Topic: NCAA Football - 2013-2014 Edition  (Read 25734 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Online HalfSmokes

  • Posts: 21923
Re: NCAA Football - 2013-2014 Edition
« Reply #50 on: August 31, 2013, 04:13:40 pm »
I can't wait for Alabama to steamroll him

Offline Slateman

  • Posts: 66688
  • THE SUMMONER OF THE REVERSE JINX
Re: NCAA Football - 2013-2014 Edition
« Reply #51 on: August 31, 2013, 05:35:23 pm »
lol, VA Tech looks terrible. 3rd and 10 and you run the option against a 3-4 team .... lulz

Seriously, how long till Beemer gets fired?

Offline Slateman

  • Posts: 66688
  • THE SUMMONER OF THE REVERSE JINX
Re: NCAA Football - 2013-2014 Edition
« Reply #52 on: August 31, 2013, 05:35:35 pm »
Welp so much for the vaunted VA Tech special teams

Offline PANatsFan

  • Posts: 37398
  • dogs in uncensored, nudes in gameday
Re: NCAA Football - 2013-2014 Edition
« Reply #53 on: August 31, 2013, 08:13:28 pm »
Ugly ugly State win
Expected Rice loss
Nats disintegrate
Crap day

Offline 1995hoo

  • Posts: 1094
Re: NCAA Football - 2013-2014 Edition
« Reply #54 on: August 31, 2013, 10:02:26 pm »
Nice win in Charlottesville. Wish I could have seen it. ESPNU cut away to the SEC. Because I have DirecTV, I couldn't put it on the iPad and AirPlay it to the Apple TV because DirecTV does not participate in the Watch ESPN app. freakers. This might make me seriously consider changing providers to FIOS, as much as I dislike their interface (based on trying it at my parents' house).

VPI losing was just icing on the cake.

Of course, we will get our arse kicked next Saturday by Oregon!

Offline TigerFan

  • Posts: 3890
  • A split allegiance is still an allegiance
Re: NCAA Football - 2013-2014 Edition
« Reply #55 on: August 31, 2013, 11:13:45 pm »
Buffalo's helmets are awesome.

TCU's are not. 

Offline Terpfan76

  • Posts: 3924
  • ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ
Re: NCAA Football - 2013-2014 Edition
« Reply #56 on: September 01, 2013, 12:17:18 am »
Diggs is a guaranteed first round pick when he declares after next year (assuming no injuries or unexpected decline in production) and Long was a 5-star recruit who dominated JUCO last year and was good in his only season at UNM.

I don't think I'm making a stretch when I say they are a top-10 WR tandem in the nation. How many teams have 2 guys who could be first round picks at WR?

ESPN rated them as the 10th best wr corp in the nation if I recall correctly.

Offline mitlen

  • Posts: 66171
  • We had 'em all the way.
Re: NCAA Football - 2013-2014 Edition
« Reply #57 on: September 01, 2013, 09:55:15 am »
TCU's are not. 

Can't do much with a Horned Frog.   :)

Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 76956
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: NCAA Football - 2013-2014 Edition
« Reply #58 on: September 07, 2013, 06:20:32 pm »
Baylor has 63 points and it's still the 3rd quarter.  :shock:

Offline varoadking

  • Posts: 30856
  • King of Goodness
Re: NCAA Football - 2013-2014 Edition
« Reply #59 on: September 07, 2013, 06:35:10 pm »
Baylor has 63 points and it's still the 3rd quarter.  :shock:

UVA kept it close against Oregon...59-10 at this point...midway thru the 4th.

Offline varoadking

  • Posts: 30856
  • King of Goodness
Re: NCAA Football - 2013-2014 Edition
« Reply #60 on: September 07, 2013, 06:36:12 pm »

Seriously, how long till Beemer gets fired?

I think he gets a pass this year simply because of who he is.  Next year...not so sure...

Offline GburgNatsFan

  • Posts: 22349
  • Let's drink a few for Mathguy.
Re: NCAA Football - 2013-2014 Edition
« Reply #61 on: September 07, 2013, 06:41:31 pm »
UMD 45-3 over ODU. I guess that's to be expected.

Offline 1995hoo

  • Posts: 1094
Re: NCAA Football - 2013-2014 Edition
« Reply #62 on: September 07, 2013, 06:41:47 pm »
UVA kept it close against Oregon...59-10 at this point...midway thru the 4th.

We have about 7 more than I expected. I expected about 52–3 Oregon.

UVA had a much better first half than I think anyone expected, but Oregon is just flat-out on a different level and it shows in the second half. Still, coming out of these first two games 1–1 is OK given the next three (VMI, at Pitt, Ball State)....4–1 isn't out of the question, though 3–2 would be no surprise either (loss in Pittsburgh).

Offline Slateman

  • Posts: 66688
  • THE SUMMONER OF THE REVERSE JINX
Re: NCAA Football - 2013-2014 Edition
« Reply #63 on: September 07, 2013, 10:07:51 pm »
Eminem looks like he's on meth

Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 76956
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: NCAA Football - 2013-2014 Edition
« Reply #64 on: September 07, 2013, 10:08:49 pm »
:smh:  They try to inject too much bullcrap into sports.

Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 76956
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: NCAA Football - 2013-2014 Edition
« Reply #65 on: September 07, 2013, 10:25:47 pm »
BYU hangs 325 yards rushing on Texas in the first half.  :shock

Offline CALSGR8

  • Posts: 11627
  • BE LOUD. BE PROUD. BE POSITIVE!
Re: NCAA Football - 2013-2014 Edition
« Reply #66 on: September 07, 2013, 11:24:12 pm »
Maryland and HIRAM WIN!

HIRAM Terriers win stops 18 game losing streak!   Whoo hoo!


http://hiramterriers.com/sports/fball/2013-14/releases/201309071tm04e


Offline mitlen

  • Posts: 66171
  • We had 'em all the way.
Re: NCAA Football - 2013-2014 Edition
« Reply #67 on: September 08, 2013, 06:13:40 am »
Maryland and HIRAM WIN!

HIRAM Terriers win stops 18 game losing streak!   Whoo hoo!


http://hiramterriers.com/sports/fball/2013-14/releases/201309071tm04e



"In the day", Westminster was one of the power houses of small college football.    Good win for Hiram.

Offline Terpfan76

  • Posts: 3924
  • ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ
Re: NCAA Football - 2013-2014 Edition
« Reply #68 on: September 08, 2013, 10:56:03 am »
Diggs is clearly all he was advertised to be.

Granted we haven't played any good teams yet but Edsel is showing he's a good coach and deserves patience. These are games we routinely struggled with in the past yet were laughers. Diggs and Long could both have huge seasons.

Offline CALSGR8

  • Posts: 11627
  • BE LOUD. BE PROUD. BE POSITIVE!
Re: NCAA Football - 2013-2014 Edition
« Reply #69 on: September 08, 2013, 11:42:21 am »
"In the day", Westminster was one of the power houses of small college football.    Good win for Hiram.
Thanks Mitlin!  I HOPE they do Ok.  Last year some of their losses were by only a touchdown.  Some were blowouts.  Here's hoping for more Ws!

Offline JCA-CrystalCity

  • Global Moderator
  • ****
  • Posts: 45414
  • Platoon - not just a movie, a baseball obsession
Re: NCAA Football - 2013-2014 Edition
« Reply #70 on: September 08, 2013, 12:11:15 pm »
I just want to say that I hate everything that has happened to college football conferences in the past 20 years.  Notre Dame and Michigan not playing anymore is the final straw.  At least most of the old big east football schools are now in the ACC.  Maybe they can set up a division with VA Tech, Miami, BC, Syracuse, and Pitt.  Maybe toss in Notre Dame, which was big east for everything except football, and then some random team that never really belonged in the Big East, like Louisville.

Offline mitlen

  • Posts: 66171
  • We had 'em all the way.
Re: NCAA Football - 2013-2014 Edition
« Reply #71 on: September 08, 2013, 12:12:40 pm »
Thanks Mitlin!  I HOPE they do Ok.  Last year some of their losses were by only a touchdown.  Some were blowouts.  Here's hoping for more Ws!

Just in case, brother-in-law's nephew plays for Wooster.   :)

Offline TigerFan

  • Posts: 3890
  • A split allegiance is still an allegiance
Re: NCAA Football - 2013-2014 Edition
« Reply #72 on: September 08, 2013, 12:15:07 pm »
I just want to say that I hate everything that has happened to college football conferences in the past 20 years.  Notre Dame and Michigan not playing anymore is the final straw.  At least most of the old big east football schools are now in the ACC.  Maybe they can set up a division with VA Tech, Miami, BC, Syracuse, and Pitt.  Maybe toss in Notre Dame, which was big east for everything except football, and then some random team that never really belonged in the Big East, like Louisville.

Notre Dame not playing Michigan anymore, though, has nothing to do with conferences.  It is, however, shameful that a great, storied rivalry will now end.

Offline Ali the Baseball Cat

  • Posts: 17943
  • babble on
Re: NCAA Football - 2013-2014 Edition
« Reply #73 on: September 08, 2013, 12:20:30 pm »
Is that bigger than Michigan/Ohio State?  I have no idea, I don't really follow college ball these days...but I seem to remember that always being a huge annual event. 

Notre Dame not playing Michigan anymore, though, has nothing to do with conferences.  It is, however, shameful that a great, storied rivalry will now end.

Offline 1995hoo

  • Posts: 1094
Re: NCAA Football - 2013-2014 Edition
« Reply #74 on: September 08, 2013, 12:32:11 pm »
Notre Dame not playing Michigan anymore, though, has nothing to do with conferences.  It is, however, shameful that a great, storied rivalry will now end.

It does in part. Notre Dame's partial ACC membership requires them to play five football games a year against ACC opponents starting next year, which means they have to drop some of their existing games. They'll always play Navy and USC. That leaves five games a year available (five ACC + Navy + USC = seven games of a 12-game schedule)...unless of course they play at Hawaii or elsewhere outside the continental USA, in which case they get an extra home game that year.